python03
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#1
as captioned! I have unconditionals for both.
0
reply
LeapingLucy
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#2
Report 1 year ago
#2
Personally, I'd go for Warwick.
0
reply
RooT_Fifteen
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#3
Report 1 year ago
#3
(Original post by python03)
x
There's little between the two courses/prestige, but I would go for UCL purely from a career perspective.

1) The London advantage when it comes to networking and saving time getting to and back from interviews. An interview whilst studying outside of London means either a 4/5am start to get into London, or travelling the night before. Repeating this throughout the second/ third year of your degree can be tiring.

2) Your network will be stronger, as there are more UCL alums working in the city than that of Warwick.

Of course, if you do not intend to work in the city, the above is irrelevant.

C
0
reply
python03
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#4
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#4
(Original post by RooT_Fifteen)
There's little between the two courses/prestige, but I would go for UCL purely from a career perspective.

1) The London advantage when it comes to networking and saving time getting to and back from interviews. An interview whilst studying outside of London means either a 4/5am start to get into London, or travelling the night before. Repeating this throughout the second/ third year of your degree can be tiring.

2) Your network will be stronger, as there are more UCL alums working in the city than that of Warwick.

Of course, if you do not intend to work in the city, the above is irrelevant.

C
Thanks for your advice, I do want to look at banking opportunities in Ldn. If I do go to UCL do I need a 1st to have a competitive application, or is a 2:1 sufficient?
0
reply
RooT_Fifteen
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#5
Report 1 year ago
#5
(Original post by python03)
x
the grade you get is pretty much irrelevant, as you should be in a position to secure internship -> full time position before graduation.

if you don't and need to apply for off cycle etc after graduation, 2i is enough.
0
reply
HangeeTw
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#6
Report 1 year ago
#6
warwick for econ
london advantage doesnt really exist, its only one hour away by train come on..
0
reply
A Rolling Stone
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#7
Report 1 year ago
#7
Warwick is far more prestigious for economics. go with Warwick. Plus the campus may be in an empty field outside of Coventry, but at least it's not in London.
0
reply
RooT_Fifteen
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#8
Report 1 year ago
#8
(Original post by HangeeTw)
warwick for econ
london advantage doesnt really exist, its only one hour away by train come on..
This is exactly what i thought for uni. But there's a couple of undeniable facts:

1. Networking opportunities are orders of magnitude different. At non-London, you're stuck with mostly career fares and campus events. There's so much more going on in London, and most students simply cannot afford the time/cost to attend these if studying outside London.

2. I too was naive about the train times and hence paid my price. The truth is that Coventry to Euston takes 1 hour. Once you include travel time to the station, travel time within London, and some spare time to account for potential delays/transport links, it takes closer to 3 hours to get to canary wharf. If you are heading in for 8:30 to attend a 9am interview, it's incredibly painful - especially if the trains are screwed.

Nothing against Warwick or its course - just pointing out the geographical disadvantage when it comes to finance.

As for the alums, Economics alum networks are similar between the two institutions. However, UCL produces many more financiers from other degrees across both arts and sciences.


(Original post by CollectiveSoul)
Warwick is far more prestigious for economics. go with Warwick. Plus the campus may be in an empty field outside of Coventry, but at least it's not in London.
Not sure where the far more prestigious is sourced from. The prestige, teaching quality and study content is extremely similar between the two institutions when viewed from both academia and industry. However, I would agree that Warwick has a nice campus.
Last edited by RooT_Fifteen; 1 year ago
1
reply
A Rolling Stone
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#9
Report 1 year ago
#9
(Original post by RooT_Fifteen)
This is exactly what i thought for uni. But there's a couple of undeniable facts:

1. Networking opportunities are orders of magnitude different. At non-London, you're stuck with mostly career fares and campus events. There's so much more going on in London, and most students simply cannot afford the time/cost to attend these if studying outside London.

2. I too was naive about the train times and hence paid my price. The truth is that Coventry to Euston takes 1 hour. Once you include travel time to the station, travel time within London, and some spare time to account for potential delays/transport links, it takes closer to 3 hours to get to canary wharf. If you are heading in for 8:30 to attend a 9am interview, it's incredibly painful - especially if the trains are screwed.

Nothing against Warwick or its course - just pointing out the geographical disadvantage when it comes to finance.

As for the alums, Economics alums are similar however UCL produces many more financiers from non-conventional degrees.




Not sure where the far more prestigious is sourced from. The prestige, teaching quality and study content is extremely similar between the two institutions when viewed from both academia and industry. However, I would agree that Warwick has a nice campus.
Warwick has amazing networking for Econ... better than UCL
0
reply
RooT_Fifteen
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#10
Report 1 year ago
#10
(Original post by CollectiveSoul)
Warwick has amazing networking for Econ... better than UCL
I question how you can definitively say this without having studied/recruited at both institutions.

As someone who is now on the other side of the table for the said networking events, this is definitely not the case. Campus-specific events and opportunities are similar for both universities. However, unlike Warwick students, there's nothing stopping UCL students from attending events in other London institutions, or attending our company open events. Additionally, any ad-hoc student networking events are always scheduled for London, due to our convenience.
1
reply
username4217900
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#11
Report 1 year ago
#11
Warwick is better for econ. Go where you think you'd enjoy yourself more though. Also take into account the high cost of living in London, making Warwick a better value for money.
1
reply
A Rolling Stone
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#12
Report 1 year ago
#12
(Original post by RooT_Fifteen)
I question how you can definitively say this without having studied/recruited at both institutions.

As someone who is now on the other side of the table for the said networking events, this is definitely not the case. Campus-specific events and opportunities are similar for both universities. However, unlike Warwick students, there's nothing stopping UCL students from attending events in other London institutions, or attending our company open events. Additionally, any ad-hoc student networking events are always scheduled for London, due to our convenience.
https://www.gradtouch.com/advice/art...uate-employers

there you go
0
reply
RooT_Fifteen
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#13
Report 1 year ago
#13
You seem to have confused both "networking vs employability" as well as "highway finance vs graduate job"

But by all means, recommend Leeds over Oxford to the next person who consults you on employability by quoting this 30-page report you probably haven't read properly.
0
reply
A Rolling Stone
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#14
Report 1 year ago
#14
(Original post by RooT_Fifteen)
You seem to have confused both "networking vs employability" as well as "highway finance vs graduate job"

But by all means, recommend Leeds over Oxford to the next person who consults you on employability by quoting this 30-page report you probably haven't read properly.
a simple bit of maths to re-organise that list /per student would give you a bit more context, which makes the difference between Warwick and UCL even more pronounced
0
reply
Infinite Series
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#15
Report 1 year ago
#15
I'll be applying to study econ next year to both of these institutions. If I get both offers, then i'll select UCL over Warwick simply because of how convenient it will be to network and attend banking events in London.

Realistically, if an employer is choosing between an applicant from UCL or Warwick, they won't pick either applicant simply because they went to UCL over Warwick or vice-versa. There's a lot more that's taken into account including work experience (which is much easier to find in London) and your network of contacts (which is similiar in both unis). I believe that UCL has an edge over Warwick, though both are excellent universities.

Another thing you may want to consider is that UCL has better international reputation than Warwick.
1
reply
NowAndThen
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#16
Report 1 year ago
#16
Both are great and arguable if one is better than the other.
Which means other factors may be more relevant.
Would you enjoy and still do well in your studies in a city campus environment? Quite a bit of commuting and higher costs of living.
Or, would you enjoy a campus type of environment?
This may be more important than you realise.
1
reply
python03
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#17
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#17
Thank you all for your constructive feedback! I'll probably go with UCL at the moment while waiting to hear back from the other universities - convenience is a pretty significant factor for me and UCL has a significantly better reputation here!
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

How are you feeling ahead of starting University?

I am excited and looking forward to starting (53)
13.77%
I am excited but have some apprehension around Covid-19 measures (51)
13.25%
I am concerned I will miss out on aspects of the uni experience due to new measures (145)
37.66%
I am concerned the Covid-19 measures at uni are not strong enough (42)
10.91%
I am nervous and feel I don't have enough information (73)
18.96%
Something else (let us know in the thread!) (21)
5.45%

Watched Threads

View All