# Second harmonic waves HELP!

Watch
Announcements
#1
Attachment 785960Can someone please explain how I could answer this question? I've attached the question above

What I have tried already is:

That the frequency of a wave can be given as follows:

f = 1/2L * sqrt (T/m)

where L = length of oscillating string , T = tension and m = mass per unit length.

I then know that 2L is the same as lambda (wavelength), so I rearranged and got this now:

lambda = 1/f * sqrt (T/m)

I think that since f and T are both constants I can say that 'lambda is proportional to 1/sqrt (m).

But I'm stuck on this part and don't where to go and move on from there.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
Last edited by Yatayyat; 1 year ago
0
1 year ago
#2
(Original post by Yatayyat)
Attachment 785840Can someone please explain how I could answer this question? I've attached the question above

What I have tried already is:

That the frequency of a wave can be given as follows:

f = 1/2L * sqrt (T/m)

where L = length of oscillating string , T = tension and m = mass per unit length.

I then know that 2L is the same as lambda (wavelength), so I rearranged and got this now:

lambda = 1/f * sqrt (T/m)

I think that since f and T are both constants I can say that 'lambda is proportional to 1/sqrt (m).

But I'm stuck on this part and don't where to go and move on from there.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
You may want to repost the attachment. I cannot see the question in the attachment.
0
#3
(Original post by Eimmanuel)
You may want to repost the attachment. I cannot see the question in the attachment.
I have reattached it now.
0
1 year ago
#4
(Original post by Yatayyat)
I have reattached it now.
Sorry just saw it. 0
1 year ago
#5
(Original post by Yatayyat)
Attachment 785960Can someone please explain how I could answer this question? I've attached the question above

What I have tried already is:

That the frequency of a wave can be given as follows:

f = 1/2L * sqrt (T/m)

where L = length of oscillating string , T = tension and m = mass per unit length.

I then know that 2L is the same as lambda (wavelength), so I rearranged and got this now:

lambda = 1/f * sqrt (T/m)

I think that since f and T are both constants I can say that 'lambda is proportional to 1/sqrt (m).

But I'm stuck on this part and don't where to go and move on from there.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
First of all, you should write the frequency of the normal modes of the standing wave is

if you want to write the general equation for the frequency instead of
(Original post by Yatayyat)
That the frequency of a wave can be given as follows:

f = 1/2L * sqrt (T/m)
where L = length of oscillating string , T = tension and m = mass per unit length.
Because the frequency that you stated is the fundamental frequency.
You can just state the second harmonics frequency for the given wave in the question as
or
where λ2= L.
Identifying that the period of the 2 half-loop is the same, this implies that the frequency is the same, too.

I suspect that we can assume that the tension is the same in this situation because the mass per unit mass changes. If both tension and mass per unit mass change, I think the problem can be complicated to solve. We need to come back to solve the partial differential equation of the wave equation.

Assume that the tension is same, then the wavelength is proportional to .
Since the wavelength increases from A to B as shown, the mass per unit length decreases from A to B so A has a greater diameter.
0
#6
(Original post by Eimmanuel)
First of all, you should write the frequency of the normal modes of the standing wave is

if you want to write the general equation for the frequency instead of

You can just state the second harmonics frequency for the given wave in the question as
or
where λ2= L.
Identifying that the period of the 2 half-loop is the same, this implies that the frequency is the same, too.

I suspect that we can assume that the tension is the same in this situation because the mass per unit mass changes. If both tension and mass per unit mass change, I think the problem can be complicated to solve. We need to come back to solve the partial differential equation of the wave equation.

Assume that the tension is same, then the wavelength is proportional to .
Since the wavelength increases from A to B as shown, the mass per unit length decreases from A to B so A has a greater diameter.
So just to reiterate it is true that wavelength is inversely proportional to the square root of mass per unit length (when constants are taken out).

And mass per unit definitely has to lower in order for wavelength to increase as shown in the figure according to the relationship. Silly of me why I couldn't see that again in the first place. Hence diameter also goes up.

And also don't know why I also expressed wavelength to be written as 2L if it explicitly says the second harmonic so L in this case

Thanks so much for the help 0
X

new posts Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### New lockdown - Do you agree schools and universities should remain open?

Yes (42)
35.9%
No (61)
52.14%
I don't know (14)
11.97%