Turn on thread page Beta

Oxbridge 'over-recruits from eight schools' watch

    • Section Leader
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Section Leader
    Oxford and Cambridge are being accused of being so socially exclusive that they recruit more students from eight top schools than almost 3,000 other English state schools put together.

    The Sutton Trust social mobility charity says the leading universities are failing to attract a wide enough range of talent.

    Trust founder Sir Peter Lampl said all young people needed a "fair chance".

    Oxford University said they "very aware" that they "must work harder".
    The study examined Oxford and Cambridge admissions data between 2015 and 2017 and found a handful of schools, mostly private, disproportionately dominating the number of places awarded.

    The Sutton Trust says pupils from eight schools filled 1,310 Oxbridge places over three years, compared with 1,220 from 2,900 other schools.

    These 2,900 schools were those with historically few admissions to Oxbridge - and accounted for about three-quarters of secondary schools.

    The charity was using anonymised admissions data - but it says that it believes most of these eight places were private schools plus a couple of big state sixth-form colleges.

    The schools are believed to include Eton, Westminster and St Paul's.

    The research also found that high achieving independent school pupils were twice as likely as state school pupils to apply to Oxford and Cambridge, even with the same ability and predicted grades.

    The report shows the imbalance in admissions:
    7% of all UK pupils attend private schools
    18% of those taking A-levels are at private school
    34% of Oxbridge applications are from private school
    42% of Oxbridge places go to private school pupils

    The study blames a lack of advice and guidance for applicants and calls for better information about what is required for entry and for admissions to take into account young people's backgrounds.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-46470838

    What do you think of this? Should more be done to even the playing field so to speak, and if so what would be the best route to take?
    • Section Leader
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Section Leader
    Although the "top 8" has changed a bit over the years:

    2013 for Cambridge, ranked by number of acceptances:
    St Paul's School, London
    Raffles Junior College, Singapore
    Haberdashers' Aske's Boys' School
    Westminster School
    King's College School
    Magdalen College School, Oxford
    Eton College
    Hills Road Sixth Form College
    Queen Elizabeth's School, Barnet

    2017 for Cambridge:
    Westminster School
    Hills Road Sixth Form College
    Sevenoaks School
    St Paul's School, London
    Hwa Chong Institution, Singapore
    Raffles Junior College, Singapore
    Henrietta Barnett School
    Eton College

    (Source: https://www.undergraduate.study.cam....ply/statistics)

    Those in bold are in both lists.

    Edit: the top 8 represented about 6% of all Cambridge acceptances, and 3.5% of all applications.
    • Very Important Poster
    • PS Reviewer
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    PS Reviewer
    Eat the rich

    (Or at least tax their schools and stop giving preference to PreU qualifications that aren’t available in most state schools)
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    It’s all cool. Let’s try to avoid social engineering and class war where possible.

    Also, last time I checked, HB and QE Boys were state schools.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Hardly surprising really.
    • Community Assistant
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by Trinculo)
    It’s all cool. Let’s try to avoid social engineering and class war where possible.

    Also, last time I checked, HB was a state school.
    It is, although a LOT of kids who've been at private school since they were 4 move there for sixth form so they can apply to Oxbridge "from a state school"
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    I’d also add that research paper this is based on sounds like an affront to social science.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    The headline is essentially that schools that select for academic ability find their pupils have greater success than those that don't. What a surprise!
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by LeapingLucy)
    It is, although a LOT of kids who've been at private school since they were 4 move there for sixth form so they can apply to Oxbridge "from a state school”
    There would be no reason why that would make a difference. HB and QE Boys are both in Barnet and have exceptionally high rates of university attendance and affluence in the local area.

    For a university to care that you went to state school, so many other factors would have to come into play. Going to a crazy grammar school isn’t one of them
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    if state schools stopped whingeing on about their "students" having "issues" and actually taught them stuff then this would not happen.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by the bear)
    if state schools stopped whingeing on about their "students" having "issues" and actually taught them stuff then this would not happen.
    I think a step forward would be to get rid of this obsession that comprehensive schools have with making girls wear ties.

    If your school makes girls wear ties, it’s probably a crap school, the only exception I can think of off hand is Wycombe Abbey.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Maybe those schools just have better students? There are some schools in my area that certainly don’t have any serious Oxbridge candidates.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MrDystopia)
    Oxford and Cambridge are being accused of being so socially exclusive that they recruit more students from eight top schools than almost 3,000 other English state schools put together.
    The title of the article (and this thread) may imply that Oxbridge encourages applicants from these schools over (other) state schools, which simply isn't the case.
    The research also found that high achieving independent school pupils were twice as likely as state school pupils to apply to Oxford and Cambridge, even with the same ability and predicted grades.
    This is the real issue, IMO.
    What do you think of this? Should more be done to even the playing field so to speak, and if so what would be the best route to take?
    The 'playing field' is level, in that Oxbridge selects the candidates that will do best there. It is not Oxbridge's fault if the state school system discourages good candidates from applying - one reason why I encourage anyone that is predicted to meet the entry requirements to apply, and attempt to dispel some of the myths about Oxford.

    Many people are put-off by what they've heard, so don't apply. They then perpetuate the myths, and claim that Oxbridge is biased against state school applicants. It isn't.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    Oxford and Cambridge universities should be turned into museums and charities. I don't believe they have any place in a 21st century meritocratic British society. For centuries, these universities have divided British society by promoting a 'them Vs us' approach to education. This is wrong. Education is about inclusively, not exclusivity. Oxbridge have limited economic growth. An increasing number of young people fail to reach their potential because these universities promote social inequality, a corrosive British class system, institutional racism, and nepotism, all methods they use to protect 'white privilege' and sustain the British class system and thus their existence. Post-Brexit Britain needs a strong economy, and Oxbridge must reform and promote an inclusive environment to achieve this. Free, universal high quality education for everyone always creates the strongest economy, just like it has in Germany and Scandinavia.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    under Mr Corbyn Oxford and Cambridge will be forced to offer courses in chimney sweeping and the laying of tarmac.

    smh
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by studentshello)
    Oxford and Cambridge universities should be turned into museums and charities. I don't believe they have any place in a 21st century meritocratic British society. For centuries, these universities have divided British society by promoting a 'them Vs us' approach to education. This is wrong. Education is about inclusively, not exclusivity. Oxbridge have limited economic growth. An increasing number of young people fail to reach their potential because these universities promote social inequality, a corrosive British class system, institutional racism, and nepotism, all methods they use to protect 'white privilege' and sustain the British class system and thus their existence. Post-Brexit Britain needs a strong economy, and Oxbridge must reform and promote an inclusive environment to achieve this. Free, universal high quality education for everyone always creates the strongest economy, just like it has in Germany and Scandinavia.
    I somewhat agree though we shouldn't fault rich students if they are much smarter than a student who is from a poor background. Yes, rich kids get better education which would mean better grades but Oxbridge is really meant for those who are VERY intelligent but that's not to say that poor kids should be automatically declined entry due to financial problems or their background.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by studentshello)
    Oxford and Cambridge universities should be turned into museums and charities. I don't believe they have any place in a 21st century meritocratic British society. For centuries, these universities have divided British society by promoting a 'them Vs us' approach to education. This is wrong. Education is about inclusively, not exclusivity. Oxbridge have limited economic growth. An increasing number of young people fail to reach their potential because these universities promote social inequality, a corrosive British class system, institutional racism, and nepotism, all methods they use to protect 'white privilege' and sustain the British class system and thus their existence. Post-Brexit Britain needs a strong economy, and Oxbridge must reform and promote an inclusive environment to achieve this. Free, universal high quality education for everyone always creates the strongest economy, just like it has in Germany and Scandinavia.
    You use the words "meritocratic" yet are compketely blind to the fact that as far as this philosophy goes, Oxbridge are the biggest proponents of not and are the only two universities where you really have to be interested in your subject and have a depth of knowledge that is genuine in order to get in.

    How about we bring back the polytechnics which actually provided useful skills instead of useless media degrees and only keep the best if the best universities for those who want to study their subject sincerely?
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by the bear)
    Oxford ... will be forced to offer ... the laying of tarmac.

    smh
    "Many, many things must be done, but nothing must be done for the first time."

    Sir Humphrey Appleby Hon Fellow Baillie College Oxford

    https://madeleineemeraldthiele.wordp...kin-road-gang/
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Yr_11_MATHS)
    I somewhat agree though we shouldn't fault rich students if they are much smarter than a student who is from a poor background. Yes, rich kids get better education which would mean better grades but Oxbridge is really meant for those who are VERY intelligent but that's not to say that poor kids should be automatically declined entry due to financial problems or their background.
    This is kinda the problem. If all the really smart kids go to Oxbridge, because of how the university is set up, it changes them into people who believe they are better than other people (because of the environment and the people they are surrounded by).
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by nulli tertius)
    "Many, many things must be done, but nothing must be done for the first time."

    Sir Humphrey Appleby Hon Fellow Baillie College Oxford

    https://madeleineemeraldthiele.wordp...kin-road-gang/
    "British democracy recognises that you need a system to protect the important things of life, and keep them out of the hands of the barbarians. Things like the opera, Radio Three, the countryside, the law, the universities … both of them"

    -same dude
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
 
 
 
Poll
Did you get less than your required grades and still get into university?
Useful resources
Uni match

Applying to uni?

Our tool will help you find the perfect course

Articles:

Debate and current affairs guidelinesDebate and current affairs wiki

Quick link:

Educational debate unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.