Why bother going to a university outside top 30 UK rank?

Watch
username3661036
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#1
I was doing research into a top university, the workload is a lot harder, they do more modules and are marked more harshly. While a bottom tier university, do half the modules, easier content and can pretty much party all year and attain a first. Which why a university like oxford attains the same number of firsts from a University like London Southbank or London Met for the same degree!

In other words a university outside the top tier, are pretty much worthless.
3
reply
LeapingLucy
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#2
Report 1 year ago
#2
That's some original "research" you've done there...
7
reply
jambojim97
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#3
Report 1 year ago
#3
mods should close this thread
2
reply
username3661036
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#4
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#4
(Original post by LeapingLucy)
That's some original "research" you've done there...
Just have a look at number of firsts from top tier unis to bottom. Pretty much identical. In some cases a bottom tier university has more firsts. https://www.timeshighereducation.com...irsts-revealed

Also I was doing course content research, a top university has a lot more content and far more modules then a bottom tier.
1
reply
J Papi
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#5
Report 1 year ago
#5
The premise may be true (there may be differences in workload depending on the subject and who's teaching it), but the conclusion is shet

I'm actually surprised that the OP isn't a one-gem troll.
2
reply
Claire461
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#6
Report 1 year ago
#6
Yawwwwnnnnnnn!
6
reply
username4310824
Badges: 22
Rep:
?
#7
Report 1 year ago
#7
Things like this make me want to quit TSR forever :facepalm:
9
reply
Dentist2024
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#8
Report 1 year ago
#8
A first is given to a certain percentile of the cohort. Also, the exams are written by the Universities and not an external exam board, so I assume the 'lower' universities have easier exams lol. What you should really be asking is; why bother doing a degree other then a STEM one, unless it's at oxbridge.
3
reply
storm95
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#9
Report 1 year ago
#9
Sorry to break it but your state of the art very exquisite research doesn’t add up, I know someone who went to a ‘top 10’ but still works in retail and someone who went to a ‘below average’ uni who now earns 40k+ a year in their field of study 2 years after graduating. Truth is it’s all down to who you are and what your real capability is because real life is different than the life you know in books.
11
reply
PrettymuchGod
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#10
Report 1 year ago
#10
Well, the reason people do is that they can use their degrees from other non top 30 universities to compete for largely the same jobs when they graduate.

Generally, the subject of a degree matters more than the place where you studied it.
0
reply
Obolinda
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#11
Report 1 year ago
#11
Oh gosh
0
reply
Drewski
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#12
Report 1 year ago
#12
(Original post by King Arthur 284)
In other words a university outside the top tier, are pretty much worthless.
Conversely... Going to all that effort and hard work to get in to and then succeed at a top uni is massively wasting your time and energy when you can get the same result ("First in English") from a uni where you can relax.
8
reply
iseesparksfly
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#13
Report 1 year ago
#13
Because some people want to go to university but perhaps:

a) They don't necessarily like the top ones
b) They want to stay at home and the top 30 don't allow that
c) They don't have the grades to go to a top uni

There's no need to judge people
14
reply
username3661036
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#14
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#14
(Original post by Dentist2024)
A first is given to a certain percentile of the cohort. Also, the exams are written by the Universities and not an external exam board, so I assume the 'lower' universities have easier exams lol. What you should really be asking is; why bother doing a degree other then a STEM one, unless it's at oxbridge.
Employers don’t look at STEM subjects, unless you want to specfically work in that film. Like people who want to be lawyers studying law. People with History degrees for example from top universities land jobs like top banking positions.
1
reply
StrangeLilBean
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#15
Report 1 year ago
#15
Other than anything else, the number of modules is completely irrelevant. Everybody does the same number of credits a year, they're just split differently. I'm doing 9 modules this year (8 which are worth 10 credits, and 1 which is worth 40 credits). My flatmate - same uni, different subject - is doing 12 modules this year, each 10 credits.

I would be surprised if it's true that top 30 unis do more modules than other unis, but even if it is true, that doesn't mean that they're doing any more credits. It just means that the work is being divided into smaller chunks at top 30s.
0
reply
username3661036
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#16
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#16
30 is a subjective number, I meant those outside the standard classes as top that we all know.
0
reply
winterscoming
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#17
Report 1 year ago
#17
'Worthless' - without worth; of no use, importance, or value; good-for-nothing. - https://www.dictionary.com/browse/worthless

Could you explain how it's the case that many graduates are accepted onto Masters degree programmes and Graduate schemes despite having a 'worthless' degree?
1
reply
username3661036
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#18
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#18
(Original post by storm95)
Sorry to break it but your state of the art very exquisite research doesn’t add up, I know someone who went to a ‘top 10’ but still works in retail and someone who went to a ‘below average’ uni who now earns 40k+ a year in their field of study 2 years after graduating. Truth is it’s all down to who you are and what your real capability is because real life is different than the life you know in books.
What was their field, soft skills are very important also, I agree it’s not just about where you went to study. Still doesnt defy the point that bottom universities are worthless to go to.
0
reply
username3661036
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#19
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#19
(Original post by ···)
Well, the reason people do is that they can use their degrees from other non top 30 universities to compete for largely the same jobs when they graduate.

Generally, the subject of a degree matters more than the place where you studied it.
That is my point, the subject of economics for example from say Cambridge has a lot more content and modules then say bottom tier uni who can party all year and get a first, its not the same
0
reply
username3661036
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#20
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#20
(Original post by Drewski)
Conversely... Going to all that effort and hard work to get in to and then succeed at a top uni is massively wasting your time and energy when you can get the same result ("First in English") from a uni where you can relax.
They should remain unemployed thereafter then. At least the top tier uni person earned his/her grade and should hence be awarded.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

If you do not get the A-level grades you want this summer, what is your likely next step?

Take autumn exams (205)
47.13%
Take exams next summer (63)
14.48%
Change uni choice through clearing (98)
22.53%
Apply to uni next year instead (44)
10.11%
I'm not applying to university (25)
5.75%

Watched Threads

View All