ban on kosher and halal slaughter has come into effect in the Flanders region of Belg

Watch
looloo2134
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#1
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ned-first.html

https://news.sky.com/story/flanders-...ghter-11601286
2
reply
username2941720
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#2
Report 1 year ago
#2
I wouldn't say it's an attack on religion, but most certainly it is preventing Muslims and Jews from practicing their religion. They will have to buy their meat abroad, which in some extreme cases, could lead to severe food shortages.

I think this is one of the instances where the law of the country should not be prioritised over religion.

Unlike the ban on headscarves in France, I believe this goes a little too far. Animal rights protection is not the right justification for this. Shouldn't human rights (freely practicing religion) come first?
4
reply
DrMikeHuntHertz
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#3
Report 1 year ago
#3
(Original post by nstar12)
Shouldn't human rights (freely practicing religion) come first?
So they can do what ever they like to animals in the name of religion?
17
reply
TommyDH
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#4
Report 1 year ago
#4
Good. Barbaric practices that belong in medieval times and have no place in a civilized society. I eat meat, I'm an eating meat advocate. But factory farms and non-stun slaughter must stop.

Let's hope this country follows soon.
12
reply
paul514
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#5
Report 1 year ago
#5
Good, we should have done this years ago
1
reply
Obolinda
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#6
Report 1 year ago
#6
Conflicted on this
0
reply
Obolinda
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#7
Report 1 year ago
#7
The way halal and kosher meat is killed is not very humane but I could argue how could you humanely kill something that doesn't want to be killed?
11
reply
Jebedee
Badges: 17
Rep:
?
#8
Report 1 year ago
#8
(Original post by nstar12)
I wouldn't say it's an attack on religion, but most certainly it is preventing Muslims and Jews from practicing their religion. They will have to buy their meat abroad, which in some extreme cases, could lead to severe food shortages.

I think this is one of the instances where the law of the country should not be prioritised over religion.

Unlike the ban on headscarves in France, I believe this goes a little too far. Animal rights protection is not the right justification for this. Shouldn't human rights (freely practicing religion) come first?
I wouldn't say animal cruelty is a human right.
6
reply
paul514
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#9
Report 1 year ago
#9
(Original post by Obolinda)
The way halal and kosher meat is killed is not very humane but I could argue how could you humanely kill something that doesn't want to be killed?
Should we shoot people in war or torture them to death?
0
reply
admonit
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#10
Report 1 year ago
#10
(Original post by TommyDH)
Good. Barbaric practices that belong in medieval times and have no place in a civilized society. I eat meat, I'm an eating meat advocate. But factory farms and non-stun slaughter must stop.

Let's hope this country follows soon.
Discussing how exactly animals should be killed to provide you meat sounds pretty cynical. If you want be honest - stop eating meat.
11
reply
Obolinda
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#11
Report 1 year ago
#11
(Original post by paul514)
Should we shoot people in war or torture them to death?
Shooting them would be more "humane". Although I wouldn't call killing somebody "humane" anyway, being shot is still quite painful. The point of war however seems to justify killing ppl better than killing the animal just to eat it, for me personally.
0
reply
paul514
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#12
Report 1 year ago
#12
(Original post by Obolinda)
Shooting them would be more "humane". Although I wouldn't call killing somebody "humane" anyway, being shot is still quite painful. The point of war however seems to justify killing ppl better than killing the animal just to eat it, for me personally.
The point I am making is that it is far more humane and there is a difference.

Anyone who disagrees is welcome to not eat meat
0
reply
Obolinda
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#13
Report 1 year ago
#13
(Original post by paul514)
The point I am making is that it is far more humane and there is a difference.

Anyone who disagrees is welcome to not eat meat
I know.

I don't and why isn't anybody who disagrees with you free to eat kosher and halal meat?
1
reply
TommyDH
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#14
Report 1 year ago
#14
(Original post by admonit)
Discussing how exactly animals should be killed to provide you meat sounds pretty cynical. If you want be honest - stop eating meat.
I did, for 3 years, and I looked like an anorexic cancer patient by hte end of it. We're omnivores, we need meat. Just because I eat meat doesn't mean I think they should be in cages too small for them and die slowly being tortured with its throat slit while some guy with a beard does satanic chants at it. That's not harvesting food, that's being a barbaric sadist.

Animals out on pastures grazing living a happy life naturally and stunned before quick painless harvest does me just fine thanks and keeps my conscience clean.
Last edited by TommyDH; 1 year ago
3
reply
Plantagenet Crown
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#15
Report 1 year ago
#15
Excellent news :woo:
2
reply
username4325990
Badges: 9
Rep:
?
#16
Report 1 year ago
#16
(Original post by Obolinda)
I know.

I don't and why isn't anybody who disagrees with you free to eat kosher and halal meat?
Exactly what I was gonna say
2
reply
TommyDH
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#17
Report 1 year ago
#17
(Original post by Obolinda)
The way halal and kosher meat is killed is not very humane but I could argue how could you humanely kill something that doesn't want to be killed?
By stunning it before harvest would be a great start. And having the harvest quick and painless, rather than the long drawn out torture that primitive practices like halal/kosher demands.
Last edited by TommyDH; 1 year ago
0
reply
paul514
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#18
Report 1 year ago
#18
(Original post by Obolinda)
I know.

I don't and why isn't anybody who disagrees with you free to eat kosher and halal meat?
Because it should be banned for the treatment of animals.

Halal can be pre stunned in their religion
0
reply
Andrew97
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#19
Report 1 year ago
#19
Human rights? Lol
1
reply
Wōden
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#20
Report 1 year ago
#20
(Original post by Obolinda)
Shooting them would be more "humane". Although I wouldn't call killing somebody "humane" anyway, being shot is still quite painful. The point of war however seems to justify killing ppl better than killing the animal just to eat it, for me personally.
Only if the war itself is justified, and the vast majority in human history probably weren't just in any shape or form. Most wars are the result of a wealthy elite wanting to take the land and resources of another wealthy elite, and drafting in the poorest who will never even see much personal benefit from said land and resources to do the dirty work for them.

Killing animals for food on the other hand is just basic survival. Yeah I know, we can survive on vegetables just fine too, but meat is still the most consistent and reliable source of food we have, and for as long as that is the case it will remain a staple part of the human diet.

Slaughtering animals for food is one thing. There is no need to turn the act into an inhumane, ritual sacrifice just to sate the Bronze age superstitions of Jews and Muslims.
2
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Should there be a new university admissions system that ditches predicted grades?

No, I think predicted grades should still be used to make offers (671)
33.65%
Yes, I like the idea of applying to uni after I received my grades (PQA) (847)
42.48%
Yes, I like the idea of receiving offers only after I receive my grades (PQO) (385)
19.31%
I think there is a better option than the ones suggested (let us know in the thread!) (91)
4.56%

Watched Threads

View All