# Integration question, for eWatch

#1
Need help remembering something from my notes. Will upload pics and circle the bit I'm struggling with. Eg Why does it become 1/(-0.25).. or 1/(-5).. instead of just the denominator?
0
#2
(Original post by jackhpward)
Need help remembering something from my notes. Will upload pics and circle the bit I'm struggling with. Eg Why does it become 1/(-0.25).. or 1/(-5).. instead of just the denominator?
0
#3
0
1 week ago
#4
(Original post by jackhpward)
Need help remembering something from my notes. Will upload pics and circle the bit I'm struggling with. Eg Why does it become 1/(-0.25).. or 1/(-5).. instead of just the denominator?
Use a substitution, then it's obvious and in the exam you shoudn't need to think about this.

Let and do it.
0
1 week ago
#5
(Original post by jackhpward)
Need help remembering something from my notes. Will upload pics and circle the bit I'm struggling with. Eg Why does it become 1/(-0.25).. or 1/(-5).. instead of just the denominator?
Are you querying where the negative sign comes from or what?

You are using the knowledge of differentiation to integrate.

When we differentiate e^(-5x) we get -5e^(-5x) using the chain rule.

So integrating -5e^(-5x) gives e^(-5x) so to integrate e^(-5x) we need to ....
0
#6
(Original post by Muttley79)
Are you querying where the negative sign comes from or what?

You are using the knowledge of differentiation to integrate.

When we differentiate e^(-5x) we get -5e^(-5x) using the chain rule.

So integrating -5e^(-5x) gives e^(-5x) so to integrate e^(-5x) we need to ....
No I'm questioning why this has become a fraction (easier to see in the second pic). Using the chain rule it should become -0.25 x e^(-0.25)?

I know this is probably a really simple question, but I just can't remember why.
0
1 week ago
#7
(Original post by jackhpward)
Using the chain rule it should become -0.25 x e^(-0.25)?
Don't confuse your differentiation with integration.

You have here found that

So, integrate both sides and you get

Thus as required.
0
1 week ago
#8
(Original post by jackhpward)
No I'm questioning why this has become a fraction (easier to see in the second pic). Using the chain rule it should become -0.25 x e^(-0.25)?

I know this is probably a really simple question, but I just can't remember why.
Yes it does when we differentiate but we are integrating. See my example in the previous post.
0
#9
(Original post by RDKGames)
Don't confuse your differentiation with integration.

You have here found that

So, integrate both sides and you get

Thus as required.
Thank you! I knew it was something simple that I was missing.
1
X

new posts
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### University open days

• University of the West of England, Bristol
Wed, 23 Jan '19
• University of East London
Wed, 23 Jan '19
• University of Gloucestershire
School of Education Open Day Postgraduate
Wed, 23 Jan '19

### Poll

Join the discussion

Remain (1629)
78.92%
Leave (435)
21.08%