The Student Room Group

Is there anyone here working class and poor who wants Remain?

Scroll to see replies

Original post by nonotyoutoo
here is a question. you are being raped. would you like to be raped quickly, or slowly?

that is the choice facing the worst off people in society. is it any wonder why 51.7% of the country voted out with millions wanting a clean break?

once we take back control from the EU, we should take back control from parliament and the house of lords too. just watch the coup in progress against brexit.

politicians like migrants to weaken the power of the country's natives and sign up to things to the EU so they can say "they had no choice" when it's what they wanted. get rid of the EU. get rid of the migrants. and if there's anything wrong left, it's solely down to the politicians. that's why they don't want us to leave.

I'd prefer to be raped quickly.
Original post by TommyDH
"Anyone with a different opinion to me is poorly educated".

It's actually that kind of attitude the poor voted leave. They're sick of sanctimonious rich white illiberals spewing hate and bile like that.


Ah, the stick it to the establishment mindset that was drip fed to you by antiestablishment pillars such as the Daily Mail, the Express, Farage and Rees-Mogg.

I don't look down on anyone for being poor or badly educated however I do look down on people who so easily fell for Brexit populism.
Original post by Abaddon rex
I am working class and definitely not a remainer

Most of us aren't, seems to have upset our "betters" we really should know our place by now.
Original post by ColinDent
Nor does an education make you know more about politics, observing politics over a number of years however does allow people to freely form opinions on political matters, and those opinions are every bit as important as those of any " educated" person.
The insinuation being made by some is that the more educated must know more than those with only a secondary level of education, they almost certainly do on the subject in which they specialise, unless of course the subject is something like politics which is all about opinion.


Not every person takes the same skills away from their higher education but as a rule of thumb an undergraduate degree should encourage a level of critical thinking that a person might not otherwise have developed. At the same time a person carrying particular attitudes and assumptions doesn't necessarily 'freely form' opinions on political matters merely because they've spend a lot of time observing. Some people spout political ignorance all their long lives despite routinely exposing themselves to political media and information. In short, you're trying to offer up a flawed dichotomy. In short, neither youth nor age nor formal education nor experience is a guarantee that a person's political views are sound or authoritative. It's what people actually argue that counts.
(edited 5 years ago)
Original post by ColinDent
Nor does an education make you know more about politics, observing politics over a number of years however does allow people to freely form opinions on political matters, and those opinions are every bit as important as those of any " educated" person.
The insinuation being made by some is that the more educated must know more than those with only a secondary level of education, they almost certainly do on the subject in which they specialise, unless of course the subject is something like politics which is all about opinion.


It’s rather disingenuous to suggest that the average Leave voter knew precisely what they were voting for, rationally analysed the pros and cons, and correctly concluded that they would be better off leaving the EU. They think they’re “taking back control of our laws” but hardly being able to name any laws that the EU ever imposed on us that the UK didn’t favour already. On immigration, the literature marketed towards Leave voters had a big arrow pointing from Turkey to the UK, with neighbouring Iraq and Syria highlighted for some reason, despite these countries having nothing to do with the EU. And let’s not forget the NHS’s extra £350 million per week advert on the side of buses. Surely this should give us an idea of how poorly informed people were.

I think the point being made is more that the poorest and least educated people in society are the ones for whom the system supposedly isn’t working, and are therefore likely to vote for change due to dissatisfaction with the status quo, or to vote against the establishment due to the feeling that their voices are not being heard.

But these effects can overshadow the more crucial point of whether or not the change being voted on is actually beneficial for them. This is dangerous because any negative impact will be felt by them the most. If the number of jobs reduce, it will be the less educated and less qualified people who struggle to get them. If the economy shrinks, it will be the less wealthy who will become unable to make ends meet.
(edited 5 years ago)
Original post by Violet Femme
Ah, the stick it to the establishment mindset that was drip fed to you by antiestablishment pillars such as the Daily Mail, the Express, Farage and Rees-Mogg.

I don't look down on anyone for being poor or badly educated however I do look down on people who so easily fell for Brexit populism.


I never voted in the referendum. Only got interested in politics last summer, long after the referendum had been and gone.

But seriously you treat the lower classes like scum then wonder why they revolt. While their children are being systematically gang-raped and slaughtered and while they're forced to live in poverty remainers live in their nice safe gated communities drinking champagne without a care in the world while calling the lower classes racists and bigots for complaining about their situation.

I wish I had voted in the referendum. The sovereignty issue aside I'd have voted just to spite remainers myself. As it stands though I support Brexit solely because I abhor authoritarianism and the EU is not a liberal order, for me liberty is priceless and thus there is no consequence too little or too great if it means preserving the value of liberty.

Besides, this is all one giant lie. The whole "only uneducated subhumans care about sovereignty and liberty" argument remainers like to peddle and cram viciously down our throats doesn't really hold up.

Tessa Keswick is highly educated. She isn't a "ignorant bigoted subhuman lower class scum". She was the Chancellor of the University of Buckingham.

Is Lady Anabbel Goldsmith an "ignorant uneducated lower class subhuman" too?

How about Woolridge? Sir Forte? How about that "thick ignorant uneducated" billionaire Will Adderly the deputy chairman of Dunelm? He's not doing so bad for a "racist uneducated lower class subhuman bigot" is he?

Terence Mordaunt? Lord Harris? How about Marshal of Marshal Wallace? (Hedge fund)? He's doing pretty damn good for himself as an ignorant uneducated lower class scum isn't he? Sir Michael Hintze? Tim Martin of JD Wetherspoon. Well I don't know about you, but I wish I was smart enough to have ended up with multiple pubs in almost every town across the country. How about Lord Farmer? They often give lower class subhumans lordships now'a'days do they for being ignorant and uneducated?

Michael Freeman? Peter Cruddas? Lord Bamford? Crispen Odey? For an uneducated person it's impressive how he's managing to hold down a job as a hedge fund manager WOW. Lord Edminston? How about the founder of Hargreaves Lansdown, one of the biggest financial monsters in the business and the most reputable in the business.. how if he's such an uneducated thicko and an ignorant lower class subhuman scum?

Sorry but this attitude from remainers is what tipped me over to the leave side, I had the same concerns as remainers but their attitude along with my concerns regarding the erosion of liberty.

I'll side with the racist, bigoted uneducated thick lower class subhumans. Thanks.
(edited 5 years ago)
I think Brexit is a huge mess but it’s both sides fault. I would have voted remain but I think the way the brexiteers have painted the remain as idiots or how the vote is payback is exaggerated and wrong. But the same applies to Remainers with the classic ‘a different opinion is wrong’
Both sides have a point but they are also toxic and contribute to the already messy politics
(edited 5 years ago)
Original post by Dannyboy2015
Oh honey, did you shake Nigel Farages hand? Look at you getting into politics! You're trollish comments came about when you started making comments about what I thought of my country based off nothing other than your own views.

Then again when you suggested that we paid more into the EU than we got out whilst wilfully ignoring the fact that they are one of our biggest trading partners and we are losing out on that to a large degree.

As for human rights, whilst there may be some areas that I do not fully agree with (e.g. prisoners having the right to vote), on the whole they make it easier for people to claim against abusive institutions and prevent government oppression. : )


Good luck selling the 'human rights r bad' story on TSR tho. lol

While much of what you say is true there have also been some terrible mistakes made in the way the HRA has been used, which has led to the belief that it is only the rights of the minorities that gain anything from the act, I have not personally heard of a single case where a person in a minority has been charged or prosecuted for abuse towards a majority member. The problem is a small minority of rabble rousers use the HRA to promote their own agendas. Why should someone who shows no regard for the Human Rights of others be able to call upon the same act to protect themselves? Burglars who take civil actions for injuries sustained whilst robbing a victim against the victim its plain wrong, there is a simple clause that could sort out this egregious mistake. The clause would run along the lines that you cannot claim for human rights whilst in the process of abusing the rights of another. Also some way of balancing the way minorities and majority abuse is handled would be important because I have been racially abused and called white trailer trash by a group of young black men who were walking under a railway bridge and filled the whole road and purposefully refused to allow my husband who was driving to get past being purposefully belligerent when he opened the window to ask them if he could get past he received abuse and then they spouted their vitriol at me too a passenger who did nothing at all to them. Why is it ok to call me white trash ? I certainly do not insult anyone because of thier race , religion or skin colour but if I did I could look forward to being charged and arrested by the police why does it only work one way? When it comes to politics I don’t trust any of them they are all out for themselves, the main parties in the uk have purposefully developed voter apathy because whilst people are uninterested they have no power to change things, and none of them can be trusted to even do the job they are doing. Labour destroy the economy every time they are in power, Tories tend to look after a small core of their supporters and screw everyone else, Libs are useless full stop with poorly thought out ideas and a change in direction with each public survey they read. The truth is the elite section of society has always looked after itself first even those that join from the lower classes become indoctrinated over time and become like the rest, self serving. The truth is the whole system is broken, now you may say what’s this got to do with Brexit? Well it has everything to do with it paying for an extra layer of bureaucracy really annoys me it’s just the old boys club again the same elite looking after their own again, the EU in principle is a great idea but it is poorly run, I wish every nation in the world would merge and we could truly become a human race but this we are together but separate is a con each nations politicians still looks to its own needs and what serves them best, and a single nation can veto any idea they disagree with so if every nation but Spain wanted free ice cream for example Spain could veto it and everyone else loses out rather than just allowing Spain to have its own way in Spain and working out a way to make it work for everyone the minority dictates to the majority.
Think about this nation we live in, why are we not allowed to fly our national flag in our country because it might cause offence, if anyone here finds it offensive why live here I wouldn’t move to Syria and demand they let me build a church and that they stop flying their flag if I don’t like they way things were I wouldn’t live there. The HRA needs to be reworked so that these problems are sorted and so that it cannot be used by someone seeking a platform who is twisting the meaning behind the spirit of the law. There are too many instances I have heard of in my private life let alone in the media of people using these laws to attempt to sue for racism, sexism etc when they are sacked even though the reality is they were sacked because they did a poor job.
I am not saying that everything about it is bad, the principle is something I wholeheartedly agree with but imho it has been poorly worded and instituted and the EU itself suffers from the same flaws.
Original post by Axiomasher
Not every person takes the same skills away from their higher education but as a rule of thumb an undergraduate degree should encourage a level of critical thinking that a person might not otherwise have developed. At the same time a person carrying particular attitudes and assumptions doesn't necessarily 'freely form' opinions on political matters merely because they've spend a lot of time observing. Some people spout political ignorance all their long lives despite routinely exposing themselves to political media and information. In short, you're trying to offer up a flawed dichotomy. In short, neither youth nor age nor formal education nor experience is a guarantee that a person's political views are sound or authoritative. It's what people actually argue that counts.

Your first point is, if I may be so bold, utter tripe
You do seem to discount life experience, when you are trying to pay a mortgage and keep a family fed you do tend to look at things a bit differently, it's all too easy to discount peoples actual experiences when sitting in an ivory tower.
People tend to become less idealistic and more cynical as they get older and for good reason.
Calm down you bloody idiots.

Just answer the question, keep it short, stop fighting with one another and stop acting like tw*ts.
Original post by Qup
Calm down you bloody idiots.

Just answer the question, keep it short, stop fighting with one another and stop acting like tw*ts.


Politics really is gonna destroy this country
Original post by tazarooni89
It’s rather disingenuous to suggest that the average Leave voter knew precisely what they were voting for, rationally analysed the pros and cons, and correctly concluded that they would be better off leaving the EU. They think they’re “taking back control of our laws” but hardly being able to name any laws that the EU ever imposed on us that the UK didn’t favour already. On immigration, the literature marketed towards Leave voters had a big arrow pointing from Turkey to the UK, with neighbouring Iraq and Syria highlighted for some reason, despite these countries having nothing to do with the EU. And let’s not forget the NHS’s extra £350 million per week advert on the side of buses. Surely this should give us an idea of how poorly informed people were.

I think the point being made is more that the poorest and least educated people in society are the ones for whom the system supposedly isn’t working, and are therefore likely to vote for change due to dissatisfaction with the status quo, or to vote against the establishment due to the feeling that their voices are not being heard.

But these effects can overshadow the more crucial point of whether or not the change being voted on is actually beneficial for them. This is dangerous because any negative impact will be felt by them the most. If the number of jobs reduce, it will be the less educated and less qualified people who struggle to get them. If the economy shrinks, it will be the less wealthy who will become unable to make ends meet.

So are you claiming that the disinformation was all one way and that the remainers campaign was 100% honest and forth right you must be having a laugh, they’re all liars it’s what they do they are after what’s best for THEMSELVES.
Define working class, first.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Original post by gladders
Define working class, first.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

working class
noun
1.
the social group consisting of people who are employed for wages, especially in manual or industrial work.
"the housing needs of the working classes"
adjective
1.
relating to or characteristic of the working class.
"a working-class community"



Copied and pasted just for you.
Original post by TommyDH
I never voted in the referendum. Only got interested in politics last summer, long after the referendum had been and gone.

But seriously you treat the lower classes like scum then wonder why they revolt. While their children are being systematically gang-raped and slaughtered and while they're forced to live in poverty remainers live in their nice safe gated communities drinking champagne without a care in the world while calling the lower classes racists and bigots for complaining about their situation.

I wish I had voted in the referendum. The sovereignty issue aside I'd have voted just to spite remainers myself. As it stands though I support Brexit solely because I abhor authoritarianism and the EU is not a liberal order, for me liberty is priceless and thus there is no consequence too little or too great if it means preserving the value of liberty.

Besides, this is all one giant lie. The whole "only uneducated subhumans care about sovereignty and liberty" argument remainers like to peddle and cram viciously down our throats doesn't really hold up.

Tessa Keswick is highly educated. She isn't a "ignorant bigoted subhuman lower class scum". She was the Chancellor of the University of Buckingham.

Is Lady Anabbel Goldsmith an "ignorant uneducated lower class subhuman" too?

How about Woolridge? Sir Forte? How about that "thick ignorant uneducated" billionaire Will Adderly the deputy chairman of Dunelm? He's not doing so bad for a "racist uneducated lower class subhuman bigot" is he?

Terence Mordaunt? Lord Harris? How about Marshal of Marshal Wallace? (Hedge fund)? He's doing pretty damn good for himself as an ignorant uneducated lower class scum isn't he? Sir Michael Hintze? Tim Martin of JD Wetherspoon. Well I don't know about you, but I wish I was smart enough to have ended up with multiple pubs in almost every town across the country. How about Lord Farmer? They often give lower class subhumans lordships now'a'days do they for being ignorant and uneducated?

Michael Freeman? Peter Cruddas? Lord Bamford? Crispen Odey? For an uneducated person it's impressive how he's managing to hold down a job as a hedge fund manager WOW. Lord Edminston? How about the founder of Hargreaves Lansdown, one of the biggest financial monsters in the business and the most reputable in the business.. how if he's such an uneducated thicko and an ignorant lower class subhuman scum?

Sorry but this attitude from remainers is what tipped me over to the leave side, I had the same concerns as remainers but their attitude along with my concerns regarding the erosion of liberty.

I'll side with the racist, bigoted uneducated thick lower class subhumans. Thanks.

Nice points unfortunately I can’t upvote you at the mo, the whole post referendum agenda has in fact made me pull further towards the Brexit camp, businesses are worried, of course they are every day the news is telling everyone how bad things will be if we Brexit whilst alternative views are rarely if ever shown, and when they are the attempt is made to belittle them and make them appear foolish, the thing is Brexit will be bad for those at the top that’s why they want to stay, it may well be worse for those at the bottom but hey we are used to it and if it leads to an improvement in our situations in the long term we can deal with it, of course the cost of champagne going up must be really terrible for those elites. They are all so greedy remember when every tv show had a different host now it seems most are hosted by the same small clique of high paid presenters and no one else gets a chance, footballers paid more in a week then medical professionals get in a year, fat cat bosses paid more for doing a bad job than an honest working person makes in a lifetime it’s all wrong, after two world wars our grandparents and great grand parents managed to gain some liberties they had long been denied and ever since those in power have worked on reclaiming the power they were forced to relinquish.
Original post by ColinDent
Myself and all of my family are working class, I'd say 90-95% of us voted to leave and 90-95% of us still want to leave.




yep. lol. SAME.

Original post by Axiomasher
Unfortunately the poorest, and the most poorly educated, tended to be most persuaded by the populist 'take our country back' rhetoric. The poor will suffer the worst consequences of a hard Brexit if it happens.


Original post by ColinDent
The poorest and the most poorly educated as you so very condescendingly put it, have been the ones that have been worst affected by our wonderful EU membership for so many years, our voices and concerns have been ignored so yes we are the group more likely to have voted to leave.
By the way can you please explain how a 22 year old with an art degree is liable to know more about politics and life in general than a 40 odd year old that has closely followed politics for the last 30 years or so, education does not equate to common sense and is no substitute for observing what is actually happening in the world.

**** COLIN. ****. exactly. Also, I was gonna say the poorest are the ones who come in contact with the foreigners often times, and who unfairly lose out to them because we have the same needs as far as support and emergency aid from council, whilst the privileged never experience close contact with majority of the foreigners who come here. Majority are impoverished, they only focus on the foreign "doctors" majority are sucking up benefits and the little public properties to live in that we as a country have left! And even the well off foreigners are taking the decent affordable properties, and UK homelessness has spiked whilst migration has spiked...make the connection. But of course the sanctimonious, self righteous privileged don't know and don't care, they just want to pat themselves on the back for being disastrously altruistic.
Original post by Notoriety
I'd prefer to be raped quickly.

hey boo xx did u vote leave?
Original post by ColinDent
Your first point is, if I may be so bold, utter tripe
You do seem to discount life experience, when you are trying to pay a mortgage and keep a family fed you do tend to look at things a bit differently, it's all too easy to discount peoples actual experiences when sitting in an ivory tower.
People tend to become less idealistic and more cynical as they get older and for good reason.


[shrug] Maybe you're just a bit self-conscious about not having been to university. Anyway, I'm not discounting life experience at all, even though you seem to be readily discounting the intellectual benefits of higher education. I'm telling you that having a bit of life experience, family responsibilities and having a longstanding interest in politics do not of themselves make your opinions authoritative. Do you really measure the worth of a person's political opinion on whether or not they have kids and a mortgage to pay? Really?
Original post by Abaddon rex
So are you claiming that the disinformation was all one way and that the remainers campaign was 100% honest and forth right you must be having a laugh, they’re all liars it’s what they do they are after what’s best for THEMSELVES.


The thing about Remain is that everyone understands perfectly well what it means. “Remain” means that things would stay exactly as they were in the first place.

It’s very difficult to spread misinformation out what Remaining would entail when people are already experiencing it for themselves.
Original post by ColinDent
working class
noun
1.
the social group consisting of people who are employed for wages, especially in manual or industrial work.
"the housing needs of the working classes"
adjective
1.
relating to or characteristic of the working class.
"a working-class community"



Copied and pasted just for you.


Thanks for your flippant and facetious reply. That definition either covers much of the country, or excludes a lot of it.

I'm a stay at home dad myself, work in a library at the weekends, and before that worked in an office doing low level office admin. Wages are low. Am I working class or middle class?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending