The Student Room Logo

Cambridge Chemical Engineering Students and Applicants

Scroll to see replies

Reply 60
I applied for Chem Eng via NatSci and got an offer this year.

If you're applying for Chem Eng/Petroleum Eng everywhere else, your personal statement will be mostly Chem Eng based.

What you have to remember is that the basis of Chemical Engineering lies in the sciences, so talk about your interest in science and how that relates to engineering. For example, maybe talk about what in Chemistry interests you and it could co-incidently be somethign that is very relevent in Chem Eng today!

The NatScis know that you're applying for Chem Eng via Natural Sciences, so will expect you to have a very Chem Eng related PS - don't worry about it :smile: As long as you apply for CHemical Engineering Via Natural Sciences on UCAS, They will be very understanding - use your SAQ from Cambridge to talk more about Natural Sciences specifically.

I would stress though that you should really be talking a lot about what interests you in your A level subjects and how you feel that you could put it to good use at university.

UCAS has really good tips on what to include for your personal statement.

Also, I wouldn't mention anything specifically for Petroleum Engineering, except maybe that you have an interest in Petroleum (but mention it as an offshoot pf Chemical Engineering).

To be honest, if I was just applying for Chem Eng courses, I would have still mentioned a lot about the sciences because they're what really links your A levels to degree level.

(sorry if this isnt making too much sense, it's 4 am where I am right now... Inbox me if you need any more help :smile: )
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 61
Original post by kpatb
I applied for Chem Eng via NatSci and got an offer this year.

If you're applying for Chem Eng/Petroleum Eng everywhere else, your personal statement will be mostly Chem Eng based.

What you have to remember is that the basis of Chemical Engineering lies in the sciences, so talk about your interest in science and how that relates to engineering. For example, maybe talk about what in Chemistry interests you and it could co-incidently be somethign that is very relevent in Chem Eng today!

The NatScis know that you're applying for Chem Eng via Natural Sciences, so will expect you to have a very Chem Eng related PS - don't worry about it :smile: As long as you apply for CHemical Engineering Via Natural Sciences on UCAS, They will be very understanding - use your SAQ from Cambridge to talk more about Natural Sciences specifically.

I would stress though that you should really be talking a lot about what interests you in your A level subjects and how you feel that you could put it to good use at university.

UCAS has really good tips on what to include for your personal statement.

Also, I wouldn't mention anything specifically for Petroleum Engineering, except maybe that you have an interest in Petroleum (but mention it as an offshoot pf Chemical Engineering).

To be honest, if I was just applying for Chem Eng courses, I would have still mentioned a lot about the sciences because they're what really links your A levels to degree level.

(sorry if this isnt making too much sense, it's 4 am where I am right now... Inbox me if you need any more help :smile: )


This is pretty much exactly what I was enquiring about and more! TYVM!!
I'll probably mention a thing or two about hydrocarbons and how chem engs use principle to crack it and the major role oil plays.

If you don't mind me asking, do you think my GCSE's would restrict my opportunity of getting on the course? From my understand Nat Sci is quite competitive.
Thanks.
Reply 62
Original post by kidoo
This is pretty much exactly what I was enquiring about and more! TYVM!!
I'll probably mention a thing or two about hydrocarbons and how chem engs use principle to crack it and the major role oil plays.

If you don't mind me asking, do you think my GCSE's would restrict my opportunity of getting on the course? From my understand Nat Sci is quite competitive.
Thanks.


Your hydrocarbon example is a perfect way to incorporate science with engineering and particularly Petroleum :smile:

Your GCSEs are a bit lower than your standard applicant, but I don't think it's the most important factor. I've seen lower.

You should really be looking to ACE your AS results and you'll be fine :smile:
Reply 63
Cambridge are very understanding about applicants who are applying for different courses elsewhere, which is why they provide you with space for an additional personal statement on the SAQ.

I have a friend who's doing Chem Eng via NatSci, let me get her:
fishpie57
BY THE QUOTING POWER INVESTED IN ME BY THE DARK LORDS OF TSR I SUMMON THEE
Reply 64
Original post by tommm
BY THE QUOTING POWER INVESTED IN ME BY THE DARK LORDS OF TSR I SUMMON THEE


Nice one.

First off, I didn't originally apply for Chemical Engineering, I just switched... :/ But I'd imagine the best plan would be to write your PS about why you want to study chemical engineering, what it is about your A-level courses that got you interested (stick some science in) or what other reading you've done to show you know what the subject involves.

As previously mentioned, you will get another opportunity on the SAQ (Supplementary Application Questionnaire) to write another Cambridge-specific personal statement, so you can tailor it more to the 'via NatSci' route here. Also, as you probably know you can also go via Engineering in first year, so Cambridge will be very used to Chemical Engineering Personal Statements coming from various angles.

Word of warning on the cracking thing: remember your statement will be read by world experts. They don't need you to explain what cracking is to them...

Best of luck :smile:
Reply 65
Original post by fishpie57
Nice one.

First off, I didn't originally apply for Chemical Engineering, I just switched... :/ But I'd imagine the best plan would be to write your PS about why you want to study chemical engineering, what it is about your A-level courses that got you interested (stick some science in) or what other reading you've done to show you know what the subject involves.

As previously mentioned, you will get another opportunity on the SAQ (Supplementary Application Questionnaire) to write another Cambridge-specific personal statement, so you can tailor it more to the 'via NatSci' route here. Also, as you probably know you can also go via Engineering in first year, so Cambridge will be very used to Chemical Engineering Personal Statements coming from various angles.

Word of warning on the cracking thing: remember your statement will be read by world experts. They don't need you to explain what cracking is to them...

Best of luck :smile:


Thanks for the advice, I definitely will need to tailor my PS. Are you finding the course demanding / interesting?
Is chemical engineering just pipes or is that an exageration?

What is the difference between doing Natsci or Engineering in your first year?
Reply 67
kidoo
...

Oops, forgot about this - apologies. I haven't actually started the Chemical Engineering yet (that will be in October) but I've been reading up on it. NatSci is by no means easy, the course is designed to challenge, so yes, demanding and interesting.

wcp
...


You can do either NatSci or Engineering in your first year - both cover material relevant to Chemical Engineering, and in the Second Year (what I'm about to start) the Engineers will take extra lectures and practicals in relevant chemistry and the NatScis will do extra lectures and practicals in relevant engineering. Arguably ChemEng is more of an engineering discipline and so engineering is better preparation, but there's no disadvantage in taking NatSci in first year if you have a strong interest in science as well. About 60% do NatSci, about 40% Engineering, and after the first year everyone should be at the same level anyway.

And it's not just pipes!!! Although there is a lot of that - heat exchangers, reactors, turbulent flow and stuff. There's also a lot of thermodynamics and kinetics, rates of reactions, economics, health and safety (by all accounts an added extra required for the course to be accredited... we'll see), applied mathematics - lots of different tools to be able to carry out chemical reactions on industrial scales.
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by fishpie57
Oops, forgot about this - apologies. I haven't actually started the Chemical Engineering yet (that will be in October) but I've been reading up on it. NatSci is by no means easy, the course is designed to challenge, so yes, demanding and interesting.



You can do either NatSci or Engineering in your first year - both cover material relevant to Chemical Engineering, and in the Second Year (what I'm about to start) the Engineers will take extra lectures and practicals in relevant chemistry and the NatScis will do extra lectures and practicals in relevant engineering. Arguably ChemEng is more of an engineering discipline and so engineering is better preparation, but there's no disadvantage in taking NatSci in first year if you have a strong interest in science as well. About 60% do NatSci, about 40% Engineering, and after the first year everyone should be at the same level anyway.

And it's not just pipes!!! Although there is a lot of that - heat exchangers, reactors, turbulent flow and stuff. There's also a lot of thermodynamics and kinetics, rates of reactions, economics, health and safety (by all accounts an added extra required for the course to be accredited... we'll see), applied mathematics - lots of different tools to be able to carry out chemical reactions on industrial scales.


I really can't decide which I would apply for. I love engineering; extending my love of science.

It sounds really interesting! What careers are you thinking of?(If you don't mind telling)
Reply 69
Original post by wcp100
I really can't decide which I would apply for. I love engineering; extending my love of science.

It sounds really interesting! What careers are you thinking of?(If you don't mind telling)


Sorry, I had a quote fail before, didn't I? :tongue: Careers... well, chemical engineer I guess. I don't know really, I'll see how I find the course and whether I'd prefer research or to go straight into industry. Not for an oil company.

I've thought about teaching for a while but always promised myself I'd do something in the real world first. It always seemed a little pointless to me spending years studying a subject only to go and teach others how to do it, without ever using it...
Original post by fishpie57
Sorry, I had a quote fail before, didn't I? :tongue: Careers... well, chemical engineer I guess. I don't know really, I'll see how I find the course and whether I'd prefer research or to go straight into industry. Not for an oil company.

I've thought about teaching for a while but always promised myself I'd do something in the real world first. It always seemed a little pointless to me spending years studying a subject only to go and teach others how to do it, without ever using it...


You did, but I found it :tongue: I don't think I'd have the patience for teaching:tongue: Yeh. I suppose that the best thing to do; wait until I've started the course. It's nice to have some idea though...(I'm thinking of interviews at this point...) Why not oil? (The future uncertain?)
Reply 71
Original post by wcp100
Why not oil? (The future uncertain?)


As I'm pretty clumsy, it would end in disaster...

Nah, just wouldn't want to sell my soul to an oil company. Could see myself working in the renewable energy sector, but oil just kills the planet and uses up valuable resources :frown: Unless the 'working for oil company' involved decreasing dependence on oil, which would be different. Hmm.

Basically I don't know. But I've got time so it's fine :smile:
Greetings,

would someone be kind enough to send me a few lecture notes for civil engineering, I'm already in my 2nd yr but would like to see if at Cambridge the teachings are more advanced. Apologies if this is the wrong forum.

Thanks.
Reply 73
I wrote a PS just for ChemEng. It's what you're ultimately applying for and also, unless you fancy writing multiple personal statements, you'll have to use the same one all your other applications. Also, in the SAQ, you get the chance to write an additional personal statement specific to Cambridge, so you can chat about NatSci in that.
Reply 74
Anyone got an offer for ChemEng via Engineering or NatSci? :tongue:
Reply 75
I did! :biggrin: ChemEng via NatSci at Trinity Hall.
Hi, I was wondering if a course for Chemical Engineering with a Year Abroad is offered? :smile:
Reply 77
Original post by shadab786ahmed
Hi, I was wondering if a course for Chemical Engineering with a Year Abroad is offered? :smile:


No not really... in the past Cambridge used to do a one year exchange with MIT in your third year for various science and technology subjects but I think this got pulled due to a lack of funding. Also, I reckon because of the way the Cambridge Chem Eng course is structured, it probably makes it hard to find another university with which it can exchange students of a similar ability.

So Nope :/
Original post by kpatb
No not really... in the past Cambridge used to do a one year exchange with MIT in your third year for various science and technology subjects but I think this got pulled due to a lack of funding. Also, I reckon because of the way the Cambridge Chem Eng course is structured, it probably makes it hard to find another university with which it can exchange students of a similar ability.

So Nope :/


Aww :frown: so do you think despite that, it would be better to study at Cambridge as opposed to Imperial who have the year abroad option?
Reply 79
I understand there are several colleges in Cambridge. What are the differences? And what do you suggest?

Quick Reply