# Even numbers proof help

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

Assume there is a largest even number, E.

E+2 would also be even, as E must be divisible by 2, so E+2 is divisible by 2, and clearly greater than E.

If E is the largest even number, then −E is the largest negative even number.

−E−2 would also be even, as −E must be divisible by 2, so −E−2 is divisible by 2, and clearly -E - 2 is a greater negative even number than E

Therefore, this contradicts the original assumption, so it must be incorrect.

Therefore, there is an infinite number of even numbers.

Is this proof sufficient, or is something missing? As the textbook's answer was much longer.

EDIT: Textbook's answer is: Suppose that there is a finte number N of even numbers

This finite list can be ordered so that E1 < E2 < E3 < ... < En

Then the largest even number is En

But 2En would also be even and clearly greater than En, so is not in the list.

Therefore, there are more than N even numbers.

This contradicts the initial proposition.

Therefore, there are infinitely many even numbers

E+2 would also be even, as E must be divisible by 2, so E+2 is divisible by 2, and clearly greater than E.

If E is the largest even number, then −E is the largest negative even number.

−E−2 would also be even, as −E must be divisible by 2, so −E−2 is divisible by 2, and clearly -E - 2 is a greater negative even number than E

Therefore, this contradicts the original assumption, so it must be incorrect.

Therefore, there is an infinite number of even numbers.

Is this proof sufficient, or is something missing? As the textbook's answer was much longer.

EDIT: Textbook's answer is: Suppose that there is a finte number N of even numbers

This finite list can be ordered so that E1 < E2 < E3 < ... < En

Then the largest even number is En

But 2En would also be even and clearly greater than En, so is not in the list.

Therefore, there are more than N even numbers.

This contradicts the initial proposition.

Therefore, there are infinitely many even numbers

0

reply

Report

#3

(Original post by

Assume there is a largest even number, E.

E+2 would also be even, as E must be divisible by 2, so E+2 is divisible by 2, and clearly greater than E.

If E is the largest even number, then −E is the largest negative even number.

−E−2 would also be even, as −E must be divisible by 2, so −E−2 is divisible by 2, and clearly -E - 2 is a greater negative even number than E

Therefore, this contradicts the original assumption, so it must be incorrect.

Therefore, there is an infinite number of even numbers.

Is this proof sufficient, or is something missing? As the textbook's answer was much longer.

EDIT: Textbook's answer is: Suppose that there is a finte number N of even numbers

This finite list can be ordered so that E1 < E2 < E3 < ... < En

Then the largest even number is En

But 2En would also be even and clearly greater than En, so is not in the list.

Therefore, there are more than N even numbers.

This contradicts the initial proposition.

Therefore, there are infinitely many even numbers

**TAEuler**)Assume there is a largest even number, E.

E+2 would also be even, as E must be divisible by 2, so E+2 is divisible by 2, and clearly greater than E.

If E is the largest even number, then −E is the largest negative even number.

−E−2 would also be even, as −E must be divisible by 2, so −E−2 is divisible by 2, and clearly -E - 2 is a greater negative even number than E

Therefore, this contradicts the original assumption, so it must be incorrect.

Therefore, there is an infinite number of even numbers.

Is this proof sufficient, or is something missing? As the textbook's answer was much longer.

EDIT: Textbook's answer is: Suppose that there is a finte number N of even numbers

This finite list can be ordered so that E1 < E2 < E3 < ... < En

Then the largest even number is En

But 2En would also be even and clearly greater than En, so is not in the list.

Therefore, there are more than N even numbers.

This contradicts the initial proposition.

Therefore, there are infinitely many even numbers

0

reply

Report

#4

**TAEuler**)

Assume there is a largest even number, E.

E+2 would also be even, as E must be divisible by 2, so E+2 is divisible by 2, and clearly greater than E.

If E is the largest even number, then −E is the largest negative even number.

−E−2 would also be even, as −E must be divisible by 2, so −E−2 is divisible by 2, and clearly -E - 2 is a greater negative even number than E

Therefore, this contradicts the original assumption, so it must be incorrect.

Therefore, there is an infinite number of even numbers.

Is this proof sufficient, or is something missing? As the textbook's answer was much longer.

EDIT: Textbook's answer is: Suppose that there is a finte number N of even numbers

This finite list can be ordered so that E1 < E2 < E3 < ... < En

Then the largest even number is En

But 2En would also be even and clearly greater than En, so is not in the list.

Therefore, there are more than N even numbers.

This contradicts the initial proposition.

Therefore, there are infinitely many even numbers

But yes, your proof is sufficient. You didn't need to dip into the negatives though.

0

reply

Report

#5

**TAEuler**)

Assume there is a largest even number, E.

E+2 would also be even, as E must be divisible by 2, so E+2 is divisible by 2, and clearly greater than E.

If E is the largest even number, then −E is the largest negative even number.

−E−2 would also be even, as −E must be divisible by 2, so −E−2 is divisible by 2, and clearly -E - 2 is a greater negative even number than E

Therefore, this contradicts the original assumption, so it must be incorrect.

Therefore, there is an infinite number of even numbers.

Is this proof sufficient, or is something missing? As the textbook's answer was much longer.

EDIT: Textbook's answer is: Suppose that there is a finte number N of even numbers

This finite list can be ordered so that E1 < E2 < E3 < ... < En

Then the largest even number is En

But 2En would also be even and clearly greater than En, so is not in the list.

Therefore, there are more than N even numbers.

This contradicts the initial proposition.

Therefore, there are infinitely many even numbers

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top