So, this question is mainly for anyone who tried both systems, italians who study in the UK or brits who study in Italy. In short, anyone who knows enough of both systems.
I am last year student in high school and I study medical biotechnologies (it's quite new) and I've also done an exchange year in the UK, so I know how A-level works.
I want to do neuroscience at uni, but in Italy it does exist only as a Master degree.
So, following the italian path I'd have to take 3 years of undergraduate in something like biotechnologies/biology and then finally start my 2 years master in neuroscience.
I've also applied to study in the UK, and I am probably going to firm Leeds.
I was really sure at first about my decision but now I am really struggling.
Studying in the UK would have so many benefits : I'd me more independent, I'd have time to get a part time job, longer summer holidays, much more lab hours/experience, societies, I'd meet people from all over the world and so on. (and of course I'd study neuroscience without waiting 3years)
My main doubt is: there is no doubt that in Italy we study more and we tend to have a broader approach to education, but there is also the risk of an education that becomes too focused on memorising textbooks than actually learning.
But on the other hand isn't the UK Education too focused? Will I actually need to study informatics, maths organic and analytical chemistry, botanics and ecology at university level to pursue my career as a researcher?
If yes, how are British institutions between the best in the world?
If no, why?
Thanks xx