# waves help

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

its question 26aii on this

http://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com/...20AS-Level.pdf

the answers are on here

http://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com/...20AS-Level.pdf

i dont understand why theyve divided 2/40 and then multiplied it by 60 like why does the 60 come into it and why is 2/40?

http://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com/...20AS-Level.pdf

the answers are on here

http://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com/...20AS-Level.pdf

i dont understand why theyve divided 2/40 and then multiplied it by 60 like why does the 60 come into it and why is 2/40?

0

reply

Report

#2

You have calculated the speed, with the equation:

v = f * lambda

We want the absolute uncertainty.

Since this is an A-Level Q and they're probably working on the assumption you've done practical physics, it's safe to assume you know about the propagation of errors. You should at least, I hope... in any case, I'll just run you through it with an arbitrary example, rather than using this one, just so that it doesn't just give you the answer.

Consider the function f(x) = 2x^2 + 4x.

It's an arbitrary function describing some variable f that depends on x. It might be tension and angle, torsion and density, whatever it might be. We want to know the uncertainty in f for some value of x, assuming we know the uncertainty in x.

Let's throw the derivative into the mix.

df(x)/dx = 4x + 4.

Can you rearrange that? It looks like you can.

df(x) = dx * (4x + 4)

That looks pretty satisfying, wouldn't you say?

If we make an approximation to this, i.e. for some small Df (D implies the triangle. I can't draw triangles in text.) there exists a Dx...

Df = Dx * (4x + 4)

This Df exists for any value x that we find in our domain. Now we can suddenly calculate the uncertainty in f for our value x.

Not really "multivariate," I just like slapping fancy words around. For the speed equation you have,

v = f * lambda

We can treat f as a constant. It has no uncertainty, it's as good as the number 4 in my example above.

Why is lambda not constant?

It has an uncertainty, and it can vary over some range. That's the simple way of saying it.

Write out your equation for the speed, v.

The uncertainty in lambda is not 2 cm. Lambda is equal to double the value of whatever you've been given. You have been given the half-wavelength, which I will call x.

Lambda = 2x

D(Lambda) = 2 * D(x)

I'll leave the rest to you. God speed.

v = f * lambda

We want the absolute uncertainty.

Since this is an A-Level Q and they're probably working on the assumption you've done practical physics, it's safe to assume you know about the propagation of errors. You should at least, I hope... in any case, I'll just run you through it with an arbitrary example, rather than using this one, just so that it doesn't just give you the answer.

Consider the function f(x) = 2x^2 + 4x.

It's an arbitrary function describing some variable f that depends on x. It might be tension and angle, torsion and density, whatever it might be. We want to know the uncertainty in f for some value of x, assuming we know the uncertainty in x.

Let's throw the derivative into the mix.

df(x)/dx = 4x + 4.

Can you rearrange that? It looks like you can.

df(x) = dx * (4x + 4)

That looks pretty satisfying, wouldn't you say?

If we make an approximation to this, i.e. for some small Df (D implies the triangle. I can't draw triangles in text.) there exists a Dx...

Df = Dx * (4x + 4)

This Df exists for any value x that we find in our domain. Now we can suddenly calculate the uncertainty in f for our value x.

**Multivariate Functions/etc**Not really "multivariate," I just like slapping fancy words around. For the speed equation you have,

v = f * lambda

We can treat f as a constant. It has no uncertainty, it's as good as the number 4 in my example above.

Why is lambda not constant?

It has an uncertainty, and it can vary over some range. That's the simple way of saying it.

**The factor of 2**Write out your equation for the speed, v.

The uncertainty in lambda is not 2 cm. Lambda is equal to double the value of whatever you've been given. You have been given the half-wavelength, which I will call x.

Lambda = 2x

D(Lambda) = 2 * D(x)

I'll leave the rest to you. God speed.

0

reply

im really sorry but i still dont understand lol why did they divide 2/40 and then multiply is by 60

(Original post by

You have calculated the speed, with the equation:

v = f * lambda

We want the absolute uncertainty.

Since this is an A-Level Q and they're probably working on the assumption you've done practical physics, it's safe to assume you know about the propagation of errors. You should at least, I hope... in any case, I'll just run you through it with an arbitrary example, rather than using this one, just so that it doesn't just give you the answer.

Consider the function f(x) = 2x^2 + 4x.

It's an arbitrary function describing some variable f that depends on x. It might be tension and angle, torsion and density, whatever it might be. We want to know the uncertainty in f for some value of x, assuming we know the uncertainty in x.

Let's throw the derivative into the mix.

df(x)/dx = 4x + 4.

Can you rearrange that? It looks like you can.

df(x) = dx * (4x + 4)

That looks pretty satisfying, wouldn't you say?

If we make an approximation to this, i.e. for some small Df (D implies the triangle. I can't draw triangles in text.) there exists a Dx...

Df = Dx * (4x + 4)

This Df exists for any value x that we find in our domain. Now we can suddenly calculate the uncertainty in f for our value x.

Not really "multivariate," I just like slapping fancy words around. For the speed equation you have,

v = f * lambda

We can treat f as a constant. It has no uncertainty, it's as good as the number 4 in my example above.

Why is lambda not constant?

It has an uncertainty, and it can vary over some range. That's the simple way of saying it.

Write out your equation for the speed, v.

The uncertainty in lambda is not 2 cm. Lambda is equal to double the value of whatever you've been given. You have been given the half-wavelength, which I will call x.

Lambda = 2x

D(Lambda) = 2 * D(x)

I'll leave the rest to you. God speed.

**Callicious**)You have calculated the speed, with the equation:

v = f * lambda

We want the absolute uncertainty.

Since this is an A-Level Q and they're probably working on the assumption you've done practical physics, it's safe to assume you know about the propagation of errors. You should at least, I hope... in any case, I'll just run you through it with an arbitrary example, rather than using this one, just so that it doesn't just give you the answer.

Consider the function f(x) = 2x^2 + 4x.

It's an arbitrary function describing some variable f that depends on x. It might be tension and angle, torsion and density, whatever it might be. We want to know the uncertainty in f for some value of x, assuming we know the uncertainty in x.

Let's throw the derivative into the mix.

df(x)/dx = 4x + 4.

Can you rearrange that? It looks like you can.

df(x) = dx * (4x + 4)

That looks pretty satisfying, wouldn't you say?

If we make an approximation to this, i.e. for some small Df (D implies the triangle. I can't draw triangles in text.) there exists a Dx...

Df = Dx * (4x + 4)

This Df exists for any value x that we find in our domain. Now we can suddenly calculate the uncertainty in f for our value x.

**Multivariate Functions/etc**Not really "multivariate," I just like slapping fancy words around. For the speed equation you have,

v = f * lambda

We can treat f as a constant. It has no uncertainty, it's as good as the number 4 in my example above.

Why is lambda not constant?

It has an uncertainty, and it can vary over some range. That's the simple way of saying it.

**The factor of 2**Write out your equation for the speed, v.

The uncertainty in lambda is not 2 cm. Lambda is equal to double the value of whatever you've been given. You have been given the half-wavelength, which I will call x.

Lambda = 2x

D(Lambda) = 2 * D(x)

I'll leave the rest to you. God speed.

0

reply

Report

#4

(Original post by

im really sorry but i still dont understand lol why did they divide 2/40 and then multiply is by 60

**Zebragirl**)im really sorry but i still dont understand lol why did they divide 2/40 and then multiply is by 60

You can derive that relationship if you use the propagation of errors and solve for the ratio.

They just skip the propagation step and use the ratio they teach you in the practical segment of your syllabus, presumably.

0

reply

omg thank you

(Original post by

The fractional uncertainty in the speed, Dv / v, equals the fractional uncertainty in the wavelength, D(lambda) / lambda.

You can derive that relationship if you use the propagation of errors and solve for the ratio.

They just skip the propagation step and use the ratio they teach you in the practical segment of your syllabus, presumably.

**Callicious**)The fractional uncertainty in the speed, Dv / v, equals the fractional uncertainty in the wavelength, D(lambda) / lambda.

You can derive that relationship if you use the propagation of errors and solve for the ratio.

They just skip the propagation step and use the ratio they teach you in the practical segment of your syllabus, presumably.

0

reply

Report

#6

(Original post by

omg thank you

**Zebragirl**)omg thank you

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top