projectile motion Watch

ddsizebra
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#1
could someone assist me please?
I can't seem to make sense of this question and I'm not using the 5m as given in the question...Name:  New Doc 2019-04-25 13.35.40_1-compressed.jpg.jpeg
Views: 16
Size:  60.3 KBName:  New Doc 2019-04-25 13.35.40_2-compressed.jpg.jpeg
Views: 15
Size:  107.6 KB
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#2
Report 3 weeks ago
#2
There look to be a few problems. For the first questoin

In the vertical direction where gravity works, you have
* the initial velocity (resolved, which is positive)
* the acceleration (-g)
* the final distance (-5)
You should be able to use suvat to calculate the time, then plug that into the resolved horizontal velocity to calculate the horizontal distance.

Try that and post your reworking?

(Original post by ddsizebra)
could someone assist me please?
I can't seem to make sense of this question and I'm not using the 5m as given in the question...Name:  New Doc 2019-04-25 13.35.40_1-compressed.jpg.jpeg
Views: 16
Size:  60.3 KBName:  New Doc 2019-04-25 13.35.40_2-compressed.jpg.jpeg
Views: 15
Size:  107.6 KB
0
reply
ddsizebra
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#3
(Original post by mqb2766)
There look to be a few problems. For the first questoin

In the vertical direction where gravity works, you have
* the initial velocity (resolved, which is positive)
* the acceleration (-g)
* the final distance (-5)
You should be able to use suvat to calculate the time, then plug that into the resolved horizontal velocity to calculate the horizontal distance.

Try that and post your reworking?
do I also include that V for height is 0m/s?
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#4
Report 3 weeks ago
#4
No, that was one of the mistakes.
Vertically, v would only be zero at the top of the arc (maximum value of s). The vertical velocity is not zero when you enter the water.
You don't have to use this in the first part of the question.

(Original post by ddsizebra)
do I also include that V for height is 0m/s?
Last edited by mqb2766; 3 weeks ago
0
reply
ddsizebra
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#5
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#5
(Original post by mqb2766)
No, that was one of the mistakes.
Vertically, v would only be zero at the top of the arc (maximum value of s). The vertical velocity is not zero when you enter the water.
You don't have to use this in the first part of the question.
Name:  New Doc 2019-04-26 11.50.55_3-compressed.jpg.jpeg
Views: 11
Size:  137.8 KB
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
0
reply
ddsizebra
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#6
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#6
my velocity is very close to the given answer but unsure if this is correct but my distance is way off
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
0
reply
username3442196
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#7
Report 3 weeks ago
#7
Did you put 60 for the angle not 40?
0
reply
ddsizebra
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#8
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#8
(Original post by old_teach)
Did you put 60 for the angle not 40?
damn...sorry I'll correct it, I was doing another question and it got stuck in my head
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#9
Report 3 weeks ago
#9
Again a few mistakes. A key thing is to be clear about the horizontal and vertical motions. Gravity is vertical only.
The v^2 = u^2+2as gives the final velocity in the vertical direction. Did you combine with the horizontal to get the final speed?
You have to work out the time in the vertical direction. Why not use
s = ut+at^2/2
Then use the time to get the horizontal distance.

(Original post by ddsizebra)
Name:  New Doc 2019-04-26 11.50.55_3-compressed.jpg.jpeg
Views: 11
Size:  137.8 KB
0
reply
ddsizebra
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#10
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#10
(Original post by mqb2766)
Again a few mistakes. A key thing is to be clear about the horizontal and vertical motions. Gravity is vertical only.
The v^2 = u^2+2as gives the final velocity in the vertical direction. Did you combine with the horizontal to get the final speed?
You have to work out the time in the vertical direction. Why not use
s = ut+at^2/2
Then use the time to get the horizontal distance.
it did do all that but now I've corrected the angle but still wrong answer... in fact it's further away from the actual answer givenName:  New Doc 2019-04-26 12.37.30-compressed.jpg.jpeg
Views: 6
Size:  107.7 KB
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
0
reply
username3442196
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#11
Report 3 weeks ago
#11
First calculation (you seem to have sq rooted a - number!!), s should have been -5 m
0
reply
ddsizebra
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#12
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#12
(Original post by old_teach)
First calculation (you seem to have sq rooted a - number!!), s should have been -5 m
it doesn't matter if a negative is square rooted as a number squared will always cause a positive value
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
0
reply
username3442196
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#13
Report 3 weeks ago
#13
(Original post by ddsizebra)
it doesn't matter if a negative is square rooted as a number squared will always cause a positive value
Not true! A negative number square rooted gives an imaginary number, which is fun.
If you're doing a calculation, and you get to try to sq root a negative, you know you've made a mistake, which is helpful.
Please try with s = -5!
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#14
Report 3 weeks ago
#14
Gravity does not operate horizontally.
And I gave you the formula to get time, pls use it.
Edit - read properly and you are using it in the vertical direction. The wording threw me.
(Original post by ddsizebra)
it doesn't matter if a negative is square rooted as a number squared will always cause a positive value
Last edited by mqb2766; 3 weeks ago
0
reply
ddsizebra
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#15
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#15
(Original post by old_teach)
Not true! A negative number square rooted gives an imaginary number, which is fun.
If you're doing a calculation, and you get to try to sq root a negative, you know you've made a mistake, which is helpful.
Please try with s = -5!
My velocity is 10.1m/s now but S=1.912m
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#16
Report 3 weeks ago
#16
Final velocity in the vertical direction is negative.
(Original post by ddsizebra)
My velocity is 10.1m/s now but S=1.912m
0
reply
username3442196
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#17
Report 3 weeks ago
#17
OK so v = - 10.1 m/s is the correct value for vertical velocity, but you need to use pythag to add horiz vel to get actual velocity and work out angle (use tan?).
As mqb2766 says v is negative, which will make your answers work out
0
reply
ddsizebra
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#18
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#18
(Original post by mqb2766)
Final velocity in the vertical direction is negative.
I got it as a positive since acceeration and distance was minus, time 2 minuses makes a positive
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
0
reply
username3442196
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#19
Report 3 weeks ago
#19
(Original post by ddsizebra)
I got it as a positive since acceeration and distance was minus, time 2 minuses makes a positive
No, you were square rooting. There are two solutions, one with v going up (+) and the one you need, when v is going down (-).
0
reply
Muttley79
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#20
Report 3 weeks ago
#20
(Original post by ddsizebra)
My velocity is 10.1m/s now but S=1.912m
Start again - DEEP BREATH

(a) use s = ut + 0.5at^2 to get t
then subst that t into s = ut for horizontal distance
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

University open days

  • Solent University
    Postgraduate and Professional Open Evenings Postgraduate
    Mon, 20 May '19
  • London Metropolitan University
    Postgraduate Mini Open Evening - Holloway Campus Undergraduate
    Tue, 21 May '19
  • Brunel University London
    Postgraduate Open Evening Postgraduate
    Wed, 22 May '19

How has 2019 been so far?

Amazing!!! (38)
5.71%
Fairly positive (217)
32.63%
Just another year... (264)
39.7%
Is it 2020 yet? (146)
21.95%

Watched Threads

View All