The first part of this question asks me to approximate the value of
∫01extanx dxfirst with two strips, then with four, and finally with eight.
I do my thing and obtain the answers without difficulty.
The second part then asks me to suggest 'a possible value for I'
Because I don't know the exact value of
∫01extanx dx I offer the approx for eight strips---this, it turns out,
is wrong.
I go to the solutions at the end of the book (C4 edexcel in this case) to see the answer only to be confronted with an answer
I am not sure I quite like or agree with at all.It says that when you halve the widths of the trapeziums that the
'differences' decrease by a third. In a table below, the three approximations for each case (2 strips, 4 strips, etc) are displayed:
1.5098
1.329
1.282
Below and between these figures are displayed these so-called
'differences' (
IMPORTANT see attachment below)
Going from 0.18 to 0.05
clearly IS NOT a reduction of 1/3Then--to make matters even more confusing-- the solution suggests a forecast difference of 0.01/2 which makes no sense at all to me.
Can you explain their reasoning please? What does the word 'differences' mean in this context--Is it the result of subtracting 1.329 from 1.5098?, or do they mean the gaps left under/over the function by the trapezoids? It seems to me--at least in this case that either:I have to calculate the exact value of ∫01extanx dx using integration by parts (which in this case I don't seem to know how to do)
or take another approximation with a larger n
Have a look at the original document