Badges: 4
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
Can anyone recommend the best structure for a 12 marker on Edexcel exam board, at the moment my teacher has recommended I do something like 1 strength and 2 weaknesses ( or vice-versa) and then a conclusion. Is this the best method or are there better alternatives?
Badges: 10
Report 2 years ago
I'm also doing A-Level (I'm presuming this is what you're referring to) Religious studies so I hope I can help you out.
The structure depends on the wording of the question. Often they will be 'Assess the strengths of the ____________' or 'Assess the weaknesses of the __________'. In this case I'd give 3 strengths or weaknesses, and then evaluate them, rather than list a strength than a weakness.
ie One strength of the design argument is its basis in a posteriori evidence that anyone is able to see. Yet a drawback of this is that when we see evidence of bad design in the world (ie natural evil - disasters, cancer etc) we inevitably have to conclude a poor designer. Similarly, as HUME points out, we have no knowledge of creating a universe so how would we understand if it was well designed. Therefore this is a poor strength of the teleological argument......' vs one strength is ___. One weakness is_____

You may also got questions such as 'Assess the idea/significance of____'. In this case you could use 1 strength/2weakness. Sometimes there may be multiple ideas so you could create a point out of each. Why not, for a significance question, assess the significance of an event to different groups of people. This method is especially good for NT studies when assessing the significance of indivudal signs/miracles in Johns gospel. Ie theological significance vs significance to the crowds at the time.

My structure would probably be:

Point 1 and Explain:
(Counter critique)

Point 2 and Explain:
(Counter critique)

Point 3 and Explain:
(Counter critique)

The generic marking pricinples for a L3 answer (9 to 12 marks) are as follows:
- A wide range of knowledge, specialist language and terminology are carefully selected and used appropriately, accurately and sustained throughout (AO1).
- Critically deconstructs religious information/issues leading to coherent and logical chains of reasoning (AO2).
- Constructs coherent and reasoned judgements of the full range of elements in the question (AO2).

Thefore a one sentence conclusion wouldnt necessarily go amiss but a introduction and conclusion are not explicity needed. Edexcel recommend around 20 minutes to write this

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
new posts
to top
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.


What support do you need with your UCAS application?

I need help researching unis (21)
I need help researching courses (8)
I need help with filling out the application form (7)
I need help with my personal statement (58)
I need help with understanding how to make my application stand out (36)
I need help with something else (let us know in the thread!) (3)
I'm feeling confident about my application and don't need any help at the moment (10)

Watched Threads

View All