geography aqa gcses, need advice on this 6 marker for rio de janeiro

Watch
zofiadoherty
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#1
question: using a case study of a city in a LIC/NEE to assess the challenge of providing services to the cities population. (6 marks)


my answer: many favelas (squatter settlements) in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil (an urban city from a NEE) are controlled by powerful drug gangs. This hostile environment makes it a challenge for UPPs (pacifying police units) to patrol the area. Although in 2013 the UPPs were able to reclaim some favelas, around 5 favelas are still too dangerous for police to enter. this means that these favelas continue to be controlled by drug gangs, and in consequence the police cant keep many innocent people safe from drug trafficking and other illegal activities. another challenge is providing education as over 50% of children in rio de janeiro dont continue school after the age of 14. this is due to poverty in rio, which is concentrated in favelas, as many teenagers need to begin working young into order to financially support their families due to low household incomes. this ultimately creates a poverty cycle as people are not able to use opportunities in education to work in higher paying jobs.


what could i improve??
0
reply
jonolethaby
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#2
Report 1 year ago
#2
Another issue could be that Government uncertainty about providing services. These are informal settlements:
- By helping the govt demonstrate that suddenly the citizens now legally own the favelas
- By improving services the government will encourage more migration to the favelas.
1
reply
zofiadoherty
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#3
thankyou
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Are you confident you could find support for your mental health if you needed it in COVID-19?

Yes (12)
18.46%
No (53)
81.54%

Watched Threads

View All