What's the difference between the logical aspects of evil and evidential? A-level rs
Watch this threadPage 1 of 1
Skip to page:
hira.naz
Badges:
14
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
Having a bit of a panic because I've looked at the specification and one of the discussion points is:
which of the logical or evidential aspects of the problem of evil pose the greater challenge to belief
I thought they were pretty much the same thing and google is 0 help
If anyone could help me out that would be very much appreciated
which of the logical or evidential aspects of the problem of evil pose the greater challenge to belief
I thought they were pretty much the same thing and google is 0 help

If anyone could help me out that would be very much appreciated


0
reply
gabicgai
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report
#2
logical: the literal, logical difficulties with the problem of evil. so, for example J.L Mackie's inconsistent triad, the Epicurean paradox. basically how it can be possible that God has certain attributes (omnipotence, omnibenevolence, omniscience) and yet evil exists. It does not make logical sense.
evidential: the evidence of evil in our world. J.S Mill is a good example because he talks about how things humans are "hanged and imprisoned for doing to one another are part of nature's everyday performances." Another good one is Fyodor Dostoevsky's novel The Brothers Karamazov, where Ivan says all the evidence of evil in the world he can see (so like children suffering) leads him to question whether God is worth worshipping.
If you have the textbook, there are sections in the problem of evil chapter on the logical and evidential problem of evil
evidential: the evidence of evil in our world. J.S Mill is a good example because he talks about how things humans are "hanged and imprisoned for doing to one another are part of nature's everyday performances." Another good one is Fyodor Dostoevsky's novel The Brothers Karamazov, where Ivan says all the evidence of evil in the world he can see (so like children suffering) leads him to question whether God is worth worshipping.
If you have the textbook, there are sections in the problem of evil chapter on the logical and evidential problem of evil

0
reply
hira.naz
Badges:
14
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
thank you thank youuuuuu, you're a star

(Original post by gabicgai)
logical: the literal, logical difficulties with the problem of evil. so, for example J.L Mackie's inconsistent triad, the Epicurean paradox. basically how it can be possible that God has certain attributes (omnipotence, omnibenevolence, omniscience) and yet evil exists. It does not make logical sense.
evidential: the evidence of evil in our world. J.S Mill is a good example because he talks about how things humans are "hanged and imprisoned for doing to one another are part of nature's everyday performances." Another good one is Fyodor Dostoevsky's novel The Brothers Karamazov, where Ivan says all the evidence of evil in the world he can see (so like children suffering) leads him to question whether God is worth worshipping.
If you have the textbook, there are sections in the problem of evil chapter on the logical and evidential problem of evil
logical: the literal, logical difficulties with the problem of evil. so, for example J.L Mackie's inconsistent triad, the Epicurean paradox. basically how it can be possible that God has certain attributes (omnipotence, omnibenevolence, omniscience) and yet evil exists. It does not make logical sense.
evidential: the evidence of evil in our world. J.S Mill is a good example because he talks about how things humans are "hanged and imprisoned for doing to one another are part of nature's everyday performances." Another good one is Fyodor Dostoevsky's novel The Brothers Karamazov, where Ivan says all the evidence of evil in the world he can see (so like children suffering) leads him to question whether God is worth worshipping.
If you have the textbook, there are sections in the problem of evil chapter on the logical and evidential problem of evil

0
reply
gabicgai
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
X
Page 1 of 1
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
Back
to top
to top