Go to first unread
Back
to top
AQA A-level Sociology 2019 paper 2: unofficial markscheme
Watch
Announcements
Haven’t seen a thread for the 2019 family/beliefs paper 2 so started one here. What did everyone think?
Evil Homer
Evil Homer
Last edited by badgercat2; 1 year ago
0
reply
family ageing population 10 marker - i did changes to pension ages, and a paragraph on young carers’ grant/carers act because of increased responsibility on the young to care for an ageing population, would that be right?
family childhood/marriage and divorce - one paragraph on more lone parents so more female role models in female headed LPFs, one paragraph on more stepfamilies so a more positive sibling relationship
feminism 20 marker - difference feminism paragraph, marxist feminism paragraph, radical feminism (millett and firestone and cultural explanation so dobash and dobash, yearnshire), and a material explanation (crompton and lyonette, edgell), and a paragraph on functionalism/new right. analysed with different theories.
beliefs 10 marker on conservative forces: paragraph on functionalism, one on marxism
10 marker on globalisation and secularisation: 1 paragraph on ‘science ans technology’ so weber and rationalisation, bruce and a technological worldview, analysed with lyon and re-enchantment. one paragraph however on fundamentalism and the growth of religion in a secular fundamentalism (davie), but analysed with fundamentalists not being a majority (not sure if it’s right?)
beliefs 20 marker - 1 paragraph on risk socialisation (miller and hoffman), 1 paragraph on false consciousness (feminist explanation), 1 paragraph on womens’ attraction to NRMs and NAMs (heelas and woodhead - Kendal) due to identity in a consumerist society.
family childhood/marriage and divorce - one paragraph on more lone parents so more female role models in female headed LPFs, one paragraph on more stepfamilies so a more positive sibling relationship
feminism 20 marker - difference feminism paragraph, marxist feminism paragraph, radical feminism (millett and firestone and cultural explanation so dobash and dobash, yearnshire), and a material explanation (crompton and lyonette, edgell), and a paragraph on functionalism/new right. analysed with different theories.
beliefs 10 marker on conservative forces: paragraph on functionalism, one on marxism
10 marker on globalisation and secularisation: 1 paragraph on ‘science ans technology’ so weber and rationalisation, bruce and a technological worldview, analysed with lyon and re-enchantment. one paragraph however on fundamentalism and the growth of religion in a secular fundamentalism (davie), but analysed with fundamentalists not being a majority (not sure if it’s right?)
beliefs 20 marker - 1 paragraph on risk socialisation (miller and hoffman), 1 paragraph on false consciousness (feminist explanation), 1 paragraph on womens’ attraction to NRMs and NAMs (heelas and woodhead - Kendal) due to identity in a consumerist society.
0
reply
Report
#3
For the globalisation question I discussed world rejecting movement such as the people's temple. Is that wrong?
0
reply
Report
#4
So did I so... if it’s wrong I’m sorry😂😂
(Original post by Jenprince77)
For the globalisation question I discussed world rejecting movement such as the people's temple. Is that wrong?
For the globalisation question I discussed world rejecting movement such as the people's temple. Is that wrong?
0
reply
nope that’s fine! i think either NRMs or traditional religion was fine to talk about
(Original post by missboooky)
So did I so... if it’s wrong I’m sorry😂😂
So did I so... if it’s wrong I’m sorry😂😂
0
reply
Report
#6
I did kind of the same on families 10 markers but on the 20 markers I only talked about feminism and radical with dobash and dobash and then talked about functionalist, Marxist, new right and postmodernists on their view of nuclear family. Is that wrong?
0
reply
Report
#7
For the 10 marker about Conservative force I wrote about how the church has monopoly of the truth etc because it asked about the church? Is this wrong as everyone else wrote about theories
0
reply
Report
#8
(Original post by badgercat2)
nope that’s fine! i think either NRMs or traditional religion was fine to talk about
nope that’s fine! i think either NRMs or traditional religion was fine to talk about
0
reply
i did the same! a paragraph on functionalism, the rest on feminism, but analysed with new right/postmodernism etc
(Original post by Shonacg)
I did kind of the same on families 10 markers but on the 20 markers I only talked about feminism and radical with dobash and dobash and then talked about functionalist, Marxist, new right and postmodernists on their view of nuclear family. Is that wrong?
I did kind of the same on families 10 markers but on the 20 markers I only talked about feminism and radical with dobash and dobash and then talked about functionalist, Marxist, new right and postmodernists on their view of nuclear family. Is that wrong?
1
reply
as long as you link to a theory should be fine. so postmodernists believe it’s just another metanarrative claiming a monopoly of the truth, but the examiner should know what you meant anyway
(Original post by lucieesmithh)
For the 10 marker about Conservative force I wrote about how the church has monopoly of the truth etc because it asked about the church? Is this wrong as everyone else wrote about theories
For the 10 marker about Conservative force I wrote about how the church has monopoly of the truth etc because it asked about the church? Is this wrong as everyone else wrote about theories
0
reply
not on this thread but there’s another thread (didn’t realise) including media https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/sho...e#post83687082
(Original post by magicjellyfishh)
did anyone do the media section? i feel like ive messed it up big time
did anyone do the media section? i feel like ive messed it up big time
0
reply
Report
#14
(Original post by magicjellyfishh)
did anyone do the media section? i feel like ive messed it up big time
did anyone do the media section? i feel like ive messed it up big time
0
reply
Report
#16
(Original post by Jenprince77)
For the globalisation question I discussed world rejecting movement such as the people's temple. Is that wrong?
For the globalisation question I discussed world rejecting movement such as the people's temple. Is that wrong?
0
reply
Report
#17
(Original post by badgercat2)
Haven’t seen a thread for the 2019 family/beliefs paper 2 so started one here. What did everyone think?
Evil Homer
Haven’t seen a thread for the 2019 family/beliefs paper 2 so started one here. What did everyone think?
Evil Homer
0
reply
Report
#18
My teacher said that the sociologist name is something you can't get penalised for, so no it's absolutely fine
(Original post by KxngAde)
am i likely to lose alot of marks if I mention a theory and what ideology it belongs to but fail to mention the specific sociologists name?
am i likely to lose alot of marks if I mention a theory and what ideology it belongs to but fail to mention the specific sociologists name?
0
reply
Report
#19
awesome 
im feeling pretty confident, but that first question about how legislation regarding ageing population has affected families and households almost had me panicking
im feeling pretty confident, but that first question about how legislation regarding ageing population has affected families and households almost had me panicking
(Original post by lucieesmithh)
My teacher said that the sociologist name is something you can't get penalised for, so no it's absolutely fine
My teacher said that the sociologist name is something you can't get penalised for, so no it's absolutely fine
0
reply
same, i sat there for 10 minutes just thinking, came up with policies but even if you don’t include specific policies you can get the marks
(Original post by KxngAde)
awesome im feeling pretty confident, but that first question about how legislation regarding ageing population has affected families and households almost had me panicking
awesome
im feeling pretty confident, but that first question about how legislation regarding ageing population has affected families and households almost had me panicking
0
reply
X
Quick Reply
