Go to first unread
Back
to top
GCSE - OCR Gateway Biology Paper 2 (TRIPLE) Watch
Announcements
How did it go? I hope I got the same answers as others as I feel I didn't..
Oh and what was the obsession over 'tits' lmaooo
Literally great tits and the next question was blue tits.. jeez OCR needs to chillout a little bit
Oh and what was the obsession over 'tits' lmaooo
Literally great tits and the next question was blue tits.. jeez OCR needs to chillout a little bit
Last edited by Jay Tommy; 4 months ago
1
reply
Report
#3
yes what the heck was that 6 marker?! I found it easier then paper 1 surprisingly, however I did literally like 2hrs revision tops, not much at all so am scared ive made a few mistakes argh
0
reply
I'm probably the only one who found paper 1 easier than paper 2..
I feel like I got like 1 mark out of 3 for the 3 markers and like 2 out of 4 for the 4 markers.
What did you get for the bar chart one, how did you draw it. That's one question I feel I did correctly.
I feel like I got like 1 mark out of 3 for the 3 markers and like 2 out of 4 for the 4 markers.
What did you get for the bar chart one, how did you draw it. That's one question I feel I did correctly.
(Original post by Hazel Hallwell)
yes what the heck was that 6 marker?! I found it easier then paper 1 surprisingly, however I did literally like 2hrs revision tops, not much at all so am scared ive made a few mistakes argh
yes what the heck was that 6 marker?! I found it easier then paper 1 surprisingly, however I did literally like 2hrs revision tops, not much at all so am scared ive made a few mistakes argh
0
reply
Report
#5
(Original post by Jay Tommy)
I'm probably the only one who found paper 1 easier than paper 2..
I feel like I got like 1 mark out of 3 for the 3 markers and like 2 out of 4 for the 4 markers.
What did you get for the bar chart one, how did you draw it. That's one question I feel I did correctly.
I'm probably the only one who found paper 1 easier than paper 2..
I feel like I got like 1 mark out of 3 for the 3 markers and like 2 out of 4 for the 4 markers.
What did you get for the bar chart one, how did you draw it. That's one question I feel I did correctly.
(Original post by Jay Tommy)
How did it go? I hope I got the same answers as others as I feel I didn't..
How did it go? I hope I got the same answers as others as I feel I didn't..
0
reply
All I wrote really was that the more copies of the CAG thingybob, the earlier the symptoms of Huntington's disease show so you can be diagnosed early and find out at an early stage. That's pretty much it I just waffled after that. (Completely **** but yk)
(Original post by mg45)
what did people write for the 6 marker
what did people write for the 6 marker
0
reply
Report
#8
same basics I described what the graph showed like the trend and then i said the gene tests is good cos people can prepare themselves and start treatment early and then i said people whose family have a history of it are more likely to have the same CAG copies and stuff and have the symptoms at similar ages. i said it was useful at the enddd
(Original post by Jay Tommy)
All I wrote really was that the more copies of the CAG thingybob, the earlier the symptoms of Huntington's disease show so you can be diagnosed early and find out at an early stage. That's pretty much it I just waffled after that. (Completely **** but yk)
All I wrote really was that the more copies of the CAG thingybob, the earlier the symptoms of Huntington's disease show so you can be diagnosed early and find out at an early stage. That's pretty much it I just waffled after that. (Completely **** but yk)
0
reply
Report
#9
i wrote about if your parents are over 60 and dont have symptoms, then you definitely don't have it, since it's dominant and turns up before 60 at the latest according to the graph.
0
reply
Other people said that you can use it to determine life expectancy to prepare for death and also choose whether you want to have kids as this means that offspring may have a chance of getting Huntingtons..
(Original post by mg45)
same basics I described what the graph showed like the trend and then i said the gene tests is good cos people can prepare themselves and start treatment early and then i said people whose family have a history of it are more likely to have the same CAG copies and stuff and have the symptoms at similar ages. i said it was useful at the enddd
same basics I described what the graph showed like the trend and then i said the gene tests is good cos people can prepare themselves and start treatment early and then i said people whose family have a history of it are more likely to have the same CAG copies and stuff and have the symptoms at similar ages. i said it was useful at the enddd
0
reply
Report
#12
For the six marker i said
- the graph compares age symptoms appear and repetition of CAG
- this can be used for a guess at about what age symptoms will affect those with disease
- by using this graph you can see a connection between the amount of times CAG is repeated. Therefore, if you find a way to make less repetitions of CAG present then you can increase the life of the patient that is unaffected by the symptoms.
- the graph compares age symptoms appear and repetition of CAG
- this can be used for a guess at about what age symptoms will affect those with disease
- by using this graph you can see a connection between the amount of times CAG is repeated. Therefore, if you find a way to make less repetitions of CAG present then you can increase the life of the patient that is unaffected by the symptoms.
(Original post by mg45)
what did people write for the 6 marker
what did people write for the 6 marker
0
reply
Report
#13
oh yeh i said that like they might not want to have kids if they know they have the disease
(Original post by Jay Tommy)
Other people said that you can use it to determine life expectancy to prepare for death and also choose whether you want to have kids as this means that offspring may have a chance of getting Huntingtons..
Other people said that you can use it to determine life expectancy to prepare for death and also choose whether you want to have kids as this means that offspring may have a chance of getting Huntingtons..
1
reply
Report
#14
really? paper 1 I messed up so bad, and Idk how to describe it, type in double bar graph, and look at images, that's what I did, with the bars next to each other
(Original post by Jay Tommy)
I'm probably the only one who found paper 1 easier than paper 2..
I feel like I got like 1 mark out of 3 for the 3 markers and like 2 out of 4 for the 4 markers.
What did you get for the bar chart one, how did you draw it. That's one question I feel I did correctly.
I'm probably the only one who found paper 1 easier than paper 2..
I feel like I got like 1 mark out of 3 for the 3 markers and like 2 out of 4 for the 4 markers.
What did you get for the bar chart one, how did you draw it. That's one question I feel I did correctly.
0
reply
(Original post by mg45)
what did u write for the climate change question w arguements for and against
what did u write for the climate change question w arguements for and against
1
reply
I did that but the bars were horizontal as I felt it was supposed to be that way as it took up most the space of the grid but I think vertically should b fine
(Original post by Hazel Hallwell)
really? paper 1 I messed up so bad, and Idk how to describe it, type in double bar graph, and look at images, that's what I did, with the bars next to each other
really? paper 1 I messed up so bad, and Idk how to describe it, type in double bar graph, and look at images, that's what I did, with the bars next to each other
0
reply
(Original post by laurennesbittxxx)
I did my graph in pen and made a mess of it so I had to skip it
I did my graph in pen and made a mess of it so I had to skip it
0
reply
Report
#20
yh i literally said that too and talked about changing seasons as well as a for argument and another against argument that an external factor may be causing variation (e.g. food availability)
(Original post by Jay Tommy)
I just said that for the 'for' part, the trend seemed to decrease since line of best fit was going down therefore climate change is contributing to eggs being laid more towards the beginning of May (idk why). Then for the against part I said that there are fluctuations. Did I get this wrong? (Ik i did)
I just said that for the 'for' part, the trend seemed to decrease since line of best fit was going down therefore climate change is contributing to eggs being laid more towards the beginning of May (idk why). Then for the against part I said that there are fluctuations. Did I get this wrong? (Ik i did)
0
reply
X
Quick Reply
