Sudan Massacre

Sounds bad but this is the way the world has always been

Certainly some life is seen a lot more important than overs..

Which is why on D day you never hear about all the Russians who gave their lived to defeat Germany

No, those are western morals, nobody else’s.

Should non-westerns pay you royalties for culturally appropriating your morals?

It’s amusing that when you try to appear as a smart ass you end up making a fool of yourself.

Then please explain to this smartarse fool how certain morals are "western and nobody else's"...

Do you seriously need someone to explain to you that the modern concept of ‘universal basic human rights’ are a western idea? Oh dear.

No, I need you to explain to me how it's somehow only applicable to westerners and nobody else. Do you oppose non-westerners defending universal human rights on the grounds that it's western and nobody else's?

And also you never hear about the Indians, Sikhs, Muslims etc who fought for the allies in the war either.

I don’t recall saying that.

So then it's not "nobody else's".

No one owns ideas including ethical ones, no matter their origin.

Again, I never said they did. Why are you trying to lie and contend I did?

No, I need you to explain to me how it's somehow only applicable to westerners and nobody else. Do you oppose non-westerners defending universal human rights on the grounds that it's western and nobody else's?

Just ignore the kid's comments

That's literally what "nobody else's" means.

Sounds bad but this is the way the world has always been

Certainly some life is seen a lot more important than overs..

Which is why on D day you never hear about all the Russians who gave their lived to defeat Germany

You’re acting like this is some horrific out of the ordinary event? Whilst it might be rather sad and what not it’s extremely common.

Fair enough, I don't suppose the Russians mention D Day when they commemorate the battle of Stalingrad.

There's also not enough appreciation for the man who made the defeat of Nazi Germany possible. Churchill and Roosevelt, largely irrelevant in comparison, are given all the credit.

Why so negative? The year is significant, people are supposed to have evolved and adapted the morals of this day and age. You wouldn't expect people to care much in the 1800s, would you? What a silly question

I'm sorry to break it to you but people in Sudan are religious and typically religious people believe that God will enhance and make their lives better but I do not believe this because If I want something, I get it done by myself and never expect anyone else to do it for me and the point I hope I am making is that they should have the freedom to believe in their religion but they should get things done instead of praying that God will do it for them.

The uprisings were not religious and did exactly that: "If I want something, I get it done by myself and never expect anyone else to do it for me"

These were protests headed by doctors, lawyers, students and women who were notably lacking religious motives. Sudan has a rich history of secular intelligentsia and even public calls for separation of religion and state.

https://www.cfr.org/blog/secularism-and-diversity-sudan