Why doesn't Labour carry out a purge?

I've heard that one hundreds of times, usually from republicans and anarchists.
Usually in relation to historical military activities in ni or allegations of collaboration with orange order linked paramilitary criminals.

Not sure what you're rambling about, the point is that the alleged 'quote' from Corbyn doesn't actually exist. Just another disingenuous slander against Corbyn. I suggest 123543 refrain from using quotation marks until he learns how to use them properly.

"A world of peace.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if every politician around the world instead of taking pride in the size of their Armed Forces did what Costa Rica have done and abolished their Army, and took pride in the fact they don't have an Army."

I think 123543 is most likely referring to the above cnd comments about abolishing the military or very similar content from Corbyn's morning star column.
The Sun paraphrased from both to generate a clickbait article in 2015 along the lines of 'pacifist labour leader wants to abolish uk military'.

"A world of peace.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if every politician around the world instead of taking pride in the size of their Armed Forces did what Costa Rica have done and abolished their Army, and took pride in the fact they don't have an Army."

I think 123543 is most likely referring to the above cnd comments about abolishing the military or very similar content from Corbyn's morning star column.
The Sun paraphrased from both to generate a clickbait article in 2015 along the lines of 'pacifist labour leader wants to abolish uk military'.

So basically, 123543 lied about Corbyn saying we should "defund the army" because he's susceptible to exactly the kind of tabloid journalism that seeks to maliciously and disingenuously slander Corbyn just as I noted and provided evidence of.

A person of sound character would apologise for spreading such a lie once it was discovered as such - what say you, @123543?

I apologise for the incorrect quotation

Thanks

Though that really should read quotations because 2/3 of your alleged quotations were demonstrably false.

He was talking about British Jews in his irony comment.

"Cynically exploiting it for their own political ends" what an offensive remark about people that have bravely whistleblown on Labour's utterly lacklustre policy on antisemitism complaints.

I agree about Conservatives and Islamophobia btw, but it doesn't by any stretch of imagination mitigate the sheerly appalling failure of the Corbynistas to tackle antisemitism.

There are countless examples of Corbyn demonstrating a significant predisposition to antisemitism, particularly his point about Jews and irony and calling Hamas and Hezbollah (two vitriolically antisemitic terrorist groups) his friends.

There nothing brave about it. These are all people who have never accepted Corbyn As leader snd are now jumping ship and talking to a very sympathetic media and establishments and may be well paid for doing so. Note none of the people that left labour to form s new party have held by elections. Why? Because their ideas suck and all they have are smears.,

I don’t think the conservators have an Islamophobia problem either., both these groups are whipping up a frenzy to shut down discussion.

...in the context of peace talks. Donald trump has called Kim jong his friend , does that mean he’s s North Korean Communist sympathiser?

Purge. Great choice of word.

If Labour wishes to remain unelectable, by all means keep Corbyn as leader.

I'm no fan of Corbyn, in fact I have been a member of the Labour Party for a while and I'm currently not, so make your own judgement of my opinions of current the Labour Party cabinet. However the unelectable arugement makes me smile, are you saying the current Conservative party, Liberal Democrats are electable?

Just look at Lib Dem successes in Local, EU and by-elections at the moment. Furthermore, polling appears fairly positive for them at the moment. Of course, it's unlikely they'd get anywhere a majority, however, if we addressed FPTP we may be able to get some kind of compromise result.
Turns out the electorate aren't massive fans of racism, soviet style communism or no-deal Brexits and would prefer pragmatic, sensible politics.

The public are not fans of racism, the UKIP collapse has proved that. However bar this I'm not sure what you mean in reality, I fear you are peddling a fallacious renainer point of view that everyone who disagree's with you is some type of evil extremist, which is unsavoury, untrue and exceptionally intolerant.

If the FPTP was scrapped and PR was implemented then Nigel Farage would almost certainly become a very senior political figure, if not PM. Think about that for a minute, now Corbyn may be a lot of things but a soviet style communist he's not.

Regarding the Lib-Dems having sensible policies I will respectfully agree to differ, the Liberal Democrats had some awful policies like the rising of the tax threshold that the Conservatives have stolen as their own, that's how bad it is! They was a protest vote and I would think now Labour are a remain party, well almost anyway, there support will fall into insignificance once more.

Now they want a no confidence vote in Corbyn. I'm a member of the Labour Party, and me and my CLP are lost for words as for how these traitors can get away with talking about Corbyn the way they do. Why aren't they all removed from the party? Tom watson and the like.

I totally agree with you about UKIP.

I’m not a Liberal Democrat member, nor am I a fallacious remanier. I dont agree with the way that a lot of the FBPE crowd conduct themselves for the very reasons you point out. I’m still very reluctant on a second referendum and would much prefer a negotiated deal, however, I do recognise this is unlikely.

I always try to conduct myself in a decent and respectful manner and I have friends that are in diametrically opposite camps from me on loads of issues - from Scottish independence, to Brexit, to taxation to social issues. However, I believe that conducting yourself in a respectful manner encompasses the right to call out the very left-wing economic and social model espoused by, perhaps less so Corbyn himself, but certainly the people around him like Len McCluskey and John McDonnell. McDonnell is a self-proclaimed Marxist, and Corbyn has said that he shows admiration for Marx. The revolutionary, soviet-style communism that these people certainly are happy to affiliate with, even if they don't directly advocate for it, is certainly not what most people in Britain support.

With regards to the manner in which Boris Johnson would lead the Conservatives, he has time and time again said he would leave on the 31st of October with a no-deal - this is supported by a faction of the leave voting population - it is not a view shared by most people.

I absolutely support some form of Proportional Representation. I completely understand that it could make Nigel Farage PM, however, it would encourage sensible, moderate thinking from the Lib Dem’s, Greens and independents in a potential coalition. Leaving aside the current political landscape though, it’s only right to have a proportional system which breaks away from the two party model we have right now. Labour and the Conservatives are no longer broad churches, they are deeply divided, factionalised parties, with various factions fighting for overall power in civil wars.

The Lib Dem’s have a lot of sensible policies, but they also have some policies I disagree with, particularly on the economic side of things - hence I’m not a member. However, nobody is going to agree with 100% of a manifesto, so I don’t think they’re a protest vote, instead I believe they’re encapsulating a large middle ground left behind by Corbyn’s Labour and Johnson’s Conservatives.

Finally, I don’t think most of the ardent remainder types will vote for Labour just because they’ve moved to a second referendum. People of that ilk are likely to see right through the “constructive ambiguity” which was populism evident of the struggle they have between the Blairite, metropolitan faction and the trade union, working class leaver faction.

I'm no fan of Corbyn, in fact I have been a member of the Labour Party for a while and I'm currently not, so make your own judgement of my opinions of current the Labour Party cabinet. However the unelectable arugement makes me smile, are you saying the current Conservative party, Liberal Democrats are electable?

What exactly must Corbyn / Labour do to convince the world that they are not antisemitic?

Being antisemitic is, frankly, the least of Corbyn's problems as a potential prime minister. He has no leadership qualities whatever (indeed, he appears to be a puppet figure), is a pacifist who has stated he would not use Britain's nuclear deterrent under any circumstances (demonstrating that he does not understand it), supports revolutionary groups over Britain, and would rip the British economy apart with marxist policies. That Labour is not miles ahead of the current government in the polls is a telling indictment on just how bad the electorate deems Corbyn's mob to be.