The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Original post by QE2
But how do you define "Islamophobia"? Prejudice against Muslims on religious grounds? Racism? Criticism of Islamic ideology?

To me, it is the irrational fear of Islam and its followers.
Reply 541
Original post by Wired_1800
An outsider would look at Judaism and conclude that all Jews are homophobic. I think this is similar to Islam. There are different parts and they range from the ultra-traditionalists to the liberal minds.

You might, but any rational person would only assume that Judaism is homophobic, but as Jews are all individuals and don't all follow Judaism to the same extent, some will be and some won't. I am baffled as to why you are having trouble understanding this simple concept.

People are attacking all Muslims, even when Muslims have written on here that they are not homophobic.

Who has "attacked all Muslims" as homophobic. It is "Islam" that is homophobic. Many Muslims are better than their religion. However, it does raise the question that if a Muslim considers their own personal morality to be superior to Allah's, then why are they Muslim at all? (The answer is culturally acquired belief, of course)
Reply 542
Original post by Good bloke
Have they? Or have they criticised Islam and criticised Moslems who are homophobic and, in particular, criticised the woman under discussion who appears to have engaged in homophobic harrassment.

@Wired_1800 seems to believe that all Muslims are the same and believe the same thing, so if you criticise the behaviour of one individual, you criticise them all.
Original post by QE2
@Wired_1800 seems to believe that all Muslims are the same and believe the same thing, so if you criticise the behaviour of one individual, you criticise them all.


That is the opposite of what I have been saying.

Original post by QE2
You might, but any rational person would only assume that Judaism is homophobic, but as Jews are all individuals and don't all follow Judaism to the same extent, some will be and some won't. I am baffled as to why you are having trouble understanding this simple concept.


Who has "attacked all Muslims" as homophobic. It is "Islam" that is homophobic. Many Muslims are better than their religion. However, it does raise the question that if a Muslim considers their own personal morality to be superior to Allah's, then why are they Muslim at all? (The answer is culturally acquired belief, of course)

When attack Islam, you attack Muslims, when you attack Judaism, you attack Jews. It is very simple.

You also have to understand that everyone has prejudices obtained from local socialisation. For example, a christian in Durham will be different than a christian in Texas. They are not all the same.
Reply 544
Original post by Wired_1800
Muslims are attacked in public and there is an anti-Islam sentiment on TSR.

Two entirely different things, one acceptable and one not.
Of course, you are going to say that one inevitably causes the other, but you would be wrong.
Muslims are attacked by right-wing idiots because they are Brown Foreigners, not because the thugs have heard the argument that the concept of Qadr negates free-will, or that Muhammad cannot be some perfect moral exemplar because he executed prisoners and had sex with a child.
Take this thread. Do you seriously believe that the EDL are a bastion of LGBT rights and attack Muslims because of Islam's homophobia? They are just as likely to be homophobes themselves!
Reply 545
Original post by Good bloke
What is wrong with that? Rational and educated people should criticise all superstitous nonsense.

@Wired_1800 seems to believe that criticising superstitious nonsense is the same as violent racist attacks.
Original post by QE2
@Wired_1800 seems to believe that criticising superstitious nonsense is the same as violent racist attacks.

No i dont
Original post by QE2
Two entirely different things, one acceptable and one not.
Of course, you are going to say that one inevitably causes the other, but you would be wrong.
Muslims are attacked by right-wing idiots because they are Brown Foreigners, not because the thugs have heard the argument that the concept of Qadr negates free-will, or that Muhammad cannot be some perfect moral exemplar because he executed prisoners and had sex with a child.
Take this thread. Do you seriously believe that the EDL are a bastion of LGBT rights and attack Muslims because of Islam's homophobia? They are just as likely to be homophobes themselves!

The EDL hates everyone, same with the far right.

There are muslims attacked for being Muslim and not because they are “brown foreigners”. There are white muslims attacked as well. You think Muslims are all brown.
Reply 548
Original post by Wired_1800
Everything is blamed on Islam. You see random guy walking down the street and he does something silly, the media backlash is “Muslim thug does so and so”. Why mention his religion? His religion did not make him to commit such offences.

You're just making stuff up now. The MSM tends to generally portray Islam and Muslims favourably.
However, if you are correct I'm sure you'll be able to produce articles where a Muslim's religion has been highlighted when it had no relevance to the story.
Reply 549
Original post by XHannahR
1) War in Islam is only permitted if the other side strikes first and if there is no other way of resolving the troubles.

Not true. There are passages from the Quran and sunnah that imply aggressive action. Muhammad invaded Mecca when a peace treaty existed and the Meccans sent an emissary to Muhammad to beg for peace. Explain that.
There are also passages that clearly command fighting against non-Muslims until they submit to Islam. Then there is the definition of "defensive". If you march your army into another territory and the people living there attack you to push you back, who is really attacking and who is defending?
The problem is that Islam is fundamentally contradictory. There are passages that imply defensive military action, and others that imply offensive.

2) If I am not mistaken, other religions such as Christianity also have punishments for homosexuality written in the Old Testament.

Whataboutery. How does Christianity being homophobic make Islam's homophobia acceptable?
Reply 551
Original post by Wired_1800
When attack Islam, you attack Muslims, when you attack Judaism, you attack Jews. It is very simple.

You also have to understand that everyone has prejudices obtained from local socialisation. For example, a christian in Durham will be different than a christian in Texas. They are not all the same.


it's like going around in circles with you. Islam and Muslims are two separate things! one is a group of people, the other is a belief system. criticising Islamic teachings does not equate to criticising Muslims.

under your logic, would this Muslim lady's verbal 'attack' on a lgbt member (who has the rights and freedoms to be gay/lesbian in this country) be an attack on British democracy?
Reply 552
Original post by XHannahR
How do you know all the info you read up on is true? What if it was purposefully twisted or written in such a manner to make you falsely hate such a peaceful religion..

My dislike of Islam comes from the contents of the Quran and sunnah, as explained in classical tafsir. If you are saying that the contents of the Quran are not true, I may have to agree with you. However, Muslims generally accept it as not only true, but perfect and often timeless and universal as well.
Original post by Wired_1800
To me, it is the irrational fear of Islam and its followers.

What do you call rational fear / dislike of Islam? That's what often gets classed as Islamaphobia.
Reply 554
Original post by Wired_1800
To me, it is the irrational fear of Islam and its followers.

So those reasonably who criticise Islamic ideology on the basis of the contents of the Quran and sunnah are not Islamophobes?
Glad we cleared that up. However, the OED has a different definition. Things can often get confusing when people unilaterally redefine words to suit their own agenda.
Original post by QE2
So those reasonably who criticise Islamic ideology on the basis of the contents of the Quran and sunnah are not Islamophobes?
Glad we cleared that up. However, the OED has a different definition. Things can often get confusing when people unilaterally redefine words to suit their own agenda.

Ok
Original post by RogerOxon
What do you call rational fear / dislike of Islam? That's what often gets classed as Islamaphobia.

Rational discussion is welcome, not hateful vitriol.
Reply 557
Original post by Wired_1800
That is the opposite of what I have been saying.

Is it? Let's see...

When attack Islam, you attack Muslims,

Oh, so you do think that they all think the same and believe that same things.
Seems it is exactly what you have been saying, but you just didn't realise it.
I feel that we have been here before, a while ago. You sometimes seem unaware of the logical conclusion of your arguments, probably because they are fundametally flawed to begin with.

You also have to understand that everyone has prejudices obtained from local socialisation. For example, a christian in Durham will be different than a christian in Texas. They are not all the same.

So when I criticise Christianity, the Cuddy will react differently to the Texan. One may be offended while the other isn't. Which contradicts your claim above that they will all react the same.
Original post by Fuego1
it's like going around in circles with you. Islam and Muslims are two separate things! one is a group of people, the other is a belief system. criticising Islamic teachings does not equate to criticising Muslims.

under your logic, would this Muslim lady's verbal 'attack' on a lgbt member (who has the rights and freedoms to be gay/lesbian in this country) be an attack on British democracy?

Yes. It is. I never said that she was right. She has a right to free speech, but one does not support her comments.
Original post by Wired_1800
When attack Islam, you attack Muslims, when you attack Judaism, you attack Jews. It is very simple.

Yes, it is very simple, but you are failing to understand it.

If you criticise an idea or claim, you are not attacking individuals. They may feel that you are, as they are irrationally attached to it, but it's simply not the case.

When a politician rubbishes a policy, are they attacking the proponents of that policy?
When a teacher marks an answer that you gave as incorrect, are they attacking you?
When someone simply has a different opinion to you, are they attacking you?

Latest

Trending

Trending