This discussion is closed.
PeeWeeDan
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#41
Report Thread starter 11 years ago
#41
I meant on this thread. The greenhouse effect has as much credibility of eugenics, but thats not what this thread is here for. Frankly greenies say the world will end in a few decades because of this that or another disaster, but nuclear theocracies destroy the world much sooner, so they are a bigger problem, which is why we need the US to be strong.
0
bella0123
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#42
Report 11 years ago
#42
(Original post by Bismarck)
No, just someone who wants hire 3 million more government workers, increase corporate taxes, force employers to have retirement accounts for their workers, force companies to give up "excess profits", increase spending by at least $500 billion a year, and pretty much destroy the dollar and the US economy in general.
that's why i'm in for the republicans.
0
Peanut42
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#43
Report 11 years ago
#43
(Original post by PeeWeeDan)
I meant on this thread. The greenhouse effect has as much credibility of eugenics, but thats not what this thread is here for. Frankly greenies say the world will end in a few decades because of this that or another disaster, but nuclear theocracies destroy the world much sooner, so they are a bigger problem, which is why we need the US to be strong.
Ah yes, I mean we all know how dangerous Saddam's nuclear weapons were...

Why does America having a strong economy mean it has to happen at the expense of the environment? Surely you can be successful and ethical. Oh no, wait, this is America I'm talking about.
0
PeeWeeDan
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#44
Report Thread starter 11 years ago
#44
Amazing logic. X did not have nukes, therefore Y, Z, A and B are all nuke free.
0
Peanut42
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#45
Report 11 years ago
#45
(Original post by PeeWeeDan)
Amazing logic. X did not have nukes, therefore Y, Z, A and B are all nuke free.
Um that wasn't what I was saying. Yes, I agree that other countries pose a threat to the US, but I still don't get why 'the war on terror' means that there can't be a 'war on global warming' so to speak.
0
username138327
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#46
Report 11 years ago
#46
Obama a communist! Bet you think Bill was a communist as well. Don't even get me started on Hillary, she'll be more left than trotsky:rolleyes:
0
PeeWeeDan
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#47
Report Thread starter 11 years ago
#47
Bill was a centrist. And I hated him. Obama is a leftist, and I hate him more.
0
#1_Wasteman
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#48
Report 11 years ago
#48
(Original post by Juggy123)
for starters i think theres a racial issue here personally hes well financed well celebritized by the likes of oprah and many youtube videos nonetheless hes not the right person for the job espeically in the current circumstances with the iraq war but the competition is poor this year so hes very very likely to take it and theres nothing you or i can do about it
and breathe...

Moron.

I'm guessing you ***** would have preferred Hilary? Bunch of *****. Bring on the neg rep and warning points.

*****.
0
username138327
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#49
Report 11 years ago
#49
(Original post by PeeWeeDan)
Bill was a centrist. And I hated him. Obama is a leftist, and I hate him more.
Waffle, what about hillary then eh? Bet you loved her.
0
PeeWeeDan
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#50
Report Thread starter 11 years ago
#50
Hated her.
0
Peanut42
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#51
Report 11 years ago
#51
(Original post by PeeWeeDan)
Hated her.
Who do you like?
0
PeeWeeDan
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#52
Report Thread starter 11 years ago
#52
Dubya 2008! 4 more years!
0
Peanut42
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#53
Report 11 years ago
#53
(Original post by PeeWeeDan)
Dubya 2008! 4 more years!
If you're not joking I think I may scream.
0
123monster
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#54
Report 11 years ago
#54
(Original post by Peanut42)
Who do you like?
that's the problem with this election, there isn't anyone good... obama is the worst of the 2 evils though...
I would've liked Romney...
0
Norfolkadam
Badges: 15
#55
Report 11 years ago
#55
(Original post by tis_me_lord)
He is not a communist, lol.
And there is the fundemental flaw in this thread.
0
PeeWeeDan
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#56
Report Thread starter 11 years ago
#56
He is however a socialist. Is that better for an economy in recession? We need Joe Lieberman not this pathetic lefty.
0
Peanut42
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#57
Report 11 years ago
#57
(Original post by PeeWeeDan)
He is however a socialist. Is that better for an economy in recession? We need Joe Lieberman not this pathetic lefty.
You like Lieberman? But I like Lieberman! *is scared is turning right wing*

You are aware he's a Democrat?
0
PeeWeeDan
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#58
Report Thread starter 11 years ago
#58
Independent now. The reason I support McCain is chiefly because he is not Obama, but I also like that he's part of the GOP(although barely...), and has Lieberman whispering in his ear. Frankly otherwise McCain is an idiot, however by far the lesser of the 2 evils.
0
Peanut42
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#59
Report 11 years ago
#59
Meh Independent Democrat. He votes with them most of the time.
0
tis_me_lord
Badges: 14
#60
Report 11 years ago
#60
(Original post by Peanut42)
*is scared is turning right wing*
It doesn't have to be a bad thing, to be right-wing!
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Why wouldn't you turn to teachers if you were being bullied?

They might tell my parents (23)
6.74%
They might tell the bully (33)
9.68%
I don't think they'd understand (52)
15.25%
It might lead to more bullying (131)
38.42%
There's nothing they could do (102)
29.91%

Watched Threads

View All