Bangz
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#1
This integral does not have antiderivative that is elementary. However, when I attempted it (before knowing the functions nature) I was able to get an elementary antiderivative. Which tells me something in my method must be wrong?

My working is below. Apologies for the handwriting.
Last edited by Bangz; 3 weeks ago
0
reply
Bangz
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#2
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#2
Name:  15667649556053050010671780171736.jpg
Views: 5
Size:  92.1 KB
0
reply
Sir Cumference
  • Study Helper
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#3
Report 3 weeks ago
#3
(Original post by Bangz)
This integral does not have antiderivative that is elementary. However, when I attempted it (before knowing the functions nature) I was able to get an elementary antiderivative. Which tells me something in my method must be wrong?

My working is below. Apologies for the handwriting.
After a quick look I can't see how you've arrived at this

\displaystyle \int xe^x(\ln x - 1) \ dx = e^x - \int e^x + \frac{e^x}{x} \ dx

Can you explain it please?
0
reply
Bangz
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#4
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#4
(Original post by Notnek)
After a quick look I can't see how you've arrived at this

\displaystyle \int xe^x(\ln x - 1) \ dx = e^x - \int e^x + \frac{e^x}{x} \ dx

Can you explain it please?
Via integration by parts. I let U be xe^x and my dV be lnx - 1
0
reply
Sir Cumference
  • Study Helper
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#5
Report 3 weeks ago
#5
Bangz I can see that your IBP explanation is below the working (which is confusing!). I'll have another look.
0
reply
RDKGames
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#6
Report 3 weeks ago
#6
(Original post by Bangz)
Via integration by parts. I let U be xe^x and my dV be lnx - 1
Surely it's not that.

You differentiated the entire thing for some reason instead of integrating it.

dv/dx becomes v through integration, but ln(x)-1 becomes 1/x through differentiation...

Last edited by RDKGames; 3 weeks ago
1
reply
Bangz
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#7
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#7
(Original post by RDKGames)
Surely it's not that.

You differentiated the entire thing for some reason instead of integrating it.

Aaaah thanks. Stupid mistake.
0
reply
Sir Cumference
  • Study Helper
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#8
Report 3 weeks ago
#8
Too slow

Bangz try to make sure your working is consistent, especially when showing it to someone else. Your "Let u(x) = ..." sometimes appeared above the IBP and sometimes below which was very confusing!
0
reply
Bangz
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#9
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#9
(Original post by Notnek)
Too slow

Bangz try to make sure your working is consistent, especially when showing it to someone else. Your "Let u(x) = ..." sometimes appeared above the IBP and sometimes below which was very confusing!
Sorry about that
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top

University open days

  • Regent's University London
    Postgraduate Open Evening Postgraduate
    Thu, 19 Sep '19
  • Durham University
    Pre-Application Open Days Undergraduate
    Fri, 20 Sep '19
  • Loughborough University
    Undergraduate Open Day Undergraduate
    Fri, 20 Sep '19

What's your favourite genre?

Rock (169)
24.53%
Pop (170)
24.67%
Jazz (27)
3.92%
Classical (41)
5.95%
Hip-Hop (126)
18.29%
Electronic (45)
6.53%
Indie (111)
16.11%

Watched Threads

View All