a level
Watch
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Skip to page:
Report
#2
(Original post by _viotl)
what will be the integration of 1/(50-m)^2
what will be the integration of 1/(50-m)^2
You'll get better help with a better subject line. There seem to be so many posts lately just called "maths" or suchlike. It's not difficult to be a bit more specific!
1
reply
(Original post by Pangol)
Write it as (50 - m)^(-2) and use the reverse chain rule.
You'll get better help with a better subject line. There seem to be so many posts lately just called "maths" or suchlike. It's not difficult to be a bit more specific!
Write it as (50 - m)^(-2) and use the reverse chain rule.
You'll get better help with a better subject line. There seem to be so many posts lately just called "maths" or suchlike. It's not difficult to be a bit more specific!
0
reply
Report
#4
(Original post by _viotl)
can you solve me this on step by step
can you solve me this on step by step
0
reply
(Original post by Pangol)
Not without giving everything away, and the aim of this forum is to help people solve their own problems. Do you know what the reverse chain rule is?
Not without giving everything away, and the aim of this forum is to help people solve their own problems. Do you know what the reverse chain rule is?
0
reply
Report
#6
Before you can use the reverse chain rule, you need to be really on top of differentiating using the chain rule. The idea is that you will notice integrals that might have come about from differentiating using the chain rule.
For example:
If we differentiate (x + 4)^7 we get 7(x + 4)^6. So if we integrate 7(x + 4)^6 we get (x+4)^7. And by extension, if we integrate (x+4)^6, we get (1/7)(x+4)^7.
Your problem is very similar. What do you think you would have to differentiate to end up with (50 - m)^(-2) ? Your first guess only needs to be approximately right, you usually have to do a bit of fine-tuning to get the constant at the start right.
But for people having problems with the reverse chain rule, the best thing to do is chain rule differentiation until you start to spot the form of the differentials. It is then much easier to go backwards.
For example:
If we differentiate (x + 4)^7 we get 7(x + 4)^6. So if we integrate 7(x + 4)^6 we get (x+4)^7. And by extension, if we integrate (x+4)^6, we get (1/7)(x+4)^7.
Your problem is very similar. What do you think you would have to differentiate to end up with (50 - m)^(-2) ? Your first guess only needs to be approximately right, you usually have to do a bit of fine-tuning to get the constant at the start right.
But for people having problems with the reverse chain rule, the best thing to do is chain rule differentiation until you start to spot the form of the differentials. It is then much easier to go backwards.
0
reply
Report
#7
(Original post by _viotl)
i dont know it completely i tried checking some videos and gives no sense at all
i dont know it completely i tried checking some videos and gives no sense at all

0
reply
Report
#9
(Original post by idontkn)
The integration rule is add 1 to the power and divide by the new power.
The integration rule is add 1 to the power and divide by the new power.
0
reply
Report
#10
(Original post by Pangol)
Yes, but this is not an integral of a simple power of the variable to be integrated, so a little more care is needed.
Yes, but this is not an integral of a simple power of the variable to be integrated, so a little more care is needed.
0
reply
Report
#11
(Original post by idontkn)
What does that mean, do you mean it’s complicated because there’s a letter (m) involved?
What does that mean, do you mean it’s complicated because there’s a letter (m) involved?
0
reply
Report
#12
(Original post by idontkn)
What does that mean, do you mean it’s complicated because there’s a letter (m) involved?
What does that mean, do you mean it’s complicated because there’s a letter (m) involved?



So your rule of 'increase exponent by 1 and divide by it' only applies to a small range of expressions we integrate, namely only integrals of the form


0
reply
Report
#13
(Original post by RDKGames)
The answer is not
because differentiating this yields
rather than
.
So your rule of 'increase exponent by 1 and divide by it' only applies to a small range of expressions we integrate, namely only integrals of the form
where
is some contstant.
The answer is not



So your rule of 'increase exponent by 1 and divide by it' only applies to a small range of expressions we integrate, namely only integrals of the form


0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
Back
to top
to top