China could crush U.S. military in Pacific: Report Watch

AngeryPenguin
Badges: 18
#1
Report Thread starter 3 weeks ago
#1
The era of U.S. dominance in the Pacific is over, a study claims, with China now capable of launching devastating military attacks that could crush American forces in the region in a matter of hours.

A startling study from the University of Sydney’s United States Studies Center argues that decades of military engagements, budget shortfalls, a lack of investment in military technologies and other factors have cost the U.S. the edge it has held in the Indo-Pacific region since the end of World War II. A Chinese attack, the Australian researchers say, could overwhelm U.S. forces in the air and at sea.

President Trump brushed off those warnings with his trademark deranged comments.

“The combined effect of ongoing wars in the Middle East, budget austerity, underinvestment in advanced military capabilities and the scale of America’s liberal order-building agenda has left the U.S. armed forces ill-prepared for great power competition in the Indo-Pacific,” the University of Sydney study says. “Chinese counter-intervention systems have undermined America’s ability to project power into the Indo-Pacific, raising the risk that China could use limited force to achieve a fait accompli victory before America can respond; and challenging U.S. security guarantees in the process.”

While China’s defense budgets surge as the country emerges as an economic superpower, officials in Beijing deny they are crafting plans for any such assault.

“What I can tell you is that China unswervingly follows the path of peaceful development and a national defense policy that is defensive in nature,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang told reporters.

But if push comes to shove, scholars say, the U.S. would stand little chance against an assault from China’s People’s Liberation Army.

“Asymmetries in power, time, distance and interest would all work against an effective American response,” the Australian study concluded. “Under present-day U.S. posture in the region, most American and allied bases and forward-deployed ships, troops and aircraft would struggle to survive a PLA salvo attack, and would be initially forced to focus on damage limitation rather than blunting the thrust of a Chinese offensive.

“American forces that are able to operate would be highly constrained in the early phases of a crisis — lacking air and naval dominance, outnumbered by their PLA equivalents and severely challenged by the loss of enabling infrastructure, like functioning airstrips, fuel depots and port facilities, all of which would be at least temporarily degraded by precision strikes,” the study continues.

Specifically, China has made huge military investments in recent years, leading to its undeniable advantage. The nation has produced hundreds of fighter aircraft and dozens of cutting-edge submarines and warships, the study said, most of which could be immediately thrown into a fight with the U.S.

China has an estimated 570 missile launchers that could be used in war, an increase of nearly 100 over its 2014 arsenal, underscoring the massive buildup in just five years.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...acific-report/
0
reply
Napp
Badges: 22
Rep:
?
#2
Report 3 weeks ago
#2
It seems to ignore the fact that the US could happily and quickly replenish any forces lost to China. This is of course also ignoring the fact that the US, unlike China, can stage strikes from its home territory again China quite easily. All things considered, whilst China might be able to cause some pain to the US if America were determined they would easily wipe the floor with the PLA.
0
reply
z-hog
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#3
Report 3 weeks ago
#3
A startling study from the University of Sydney’s United States Studies Center argues that...
The world is packed with 'research' from Uni departments and academics that rarely leave their desks but the end result is always the same:

President Trump brushed off those warnings with his trademark deranged comments.
Oh well, for as long as Trumpophobes keep taking their pills they won't be bothered by anything else in their mock studies and analysis. It's not as if anybody else cares, really.
0
reply
Andrew97
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#4
Report 3 weeks ago
#4
Japan tried that. Didn’t go to well.
0
reply
Tempest II
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#5
Report 3 weeks ago
#5
I prefer this report:

https://www.rand.org/paf/projects/us...scorecard.html

While the PRC has come a long way over the last 20-30 years, against the US they'd still struggle. In 20-30 more years, the situation may be somewhat different though.
Last edited by Tempest II; 3 weeks ago
0
reply
BlueIndigoViolet
Badges: 17
Rep:
?
#6
Report 3 weeks ago
#6
What is with these threads lol

AngeryPenguin. Sponsored by the Communist Party of China
1
reply
Drewski
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#7
Report 3 weeks ago
#7
Australian academics have a history of bashing the US military in thinly veiled attempts at strengthening their own armed forces.
0
reply
NickAlex12
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#8
Report 3 weeks ago
#8
Doesn’t matter since nukes mean that either one of them could wipe out humanity at any time if they wanted to
0
reply
williamho
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#9
Report 2 weeks ago
#9
based on a piece of report, people believes https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...acific-report/ that China wants to go to war.

Let have a look back at world history.

When was the last time China went to war, apart from the border disputes.

well it must be a long long time ago.

and now, when did the last time the US went to war ? Iraq ? Afghanistan ?

Going to war will costs lives.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

How has the start of this academic year been for you?

Loving it - gonna be a great year (134)
17.77%
It's just nice to be back! (204)
27.06%
Not great so far... (271)
35.94%
I want to drop out! (145)
19.23%

Watched Threads

View All