Back
to top
The behaviourist approach and learning (A-level Psychology help)
Watch
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Hi,
An assumption of the behaviorist approach is that all behaviour is learnt from the environment, if that is the case than why do we have 'unconditioned responses' which are basically 'innate'? I am so confused.... how can we have innate responses if the behaviourist approach assumes that all behaviour (i.e. responses) are learnt.
This is so confusing and annoying and giving me a massive headache.
Thanks in advance for any help
An assumption of the behaviorist approach is that all behaviour is learnt from the environment, if that is the case than why do we have 'unconditioned responses' which are basically 'innate'? I am so confused.... how can we have innate responses if the behaviourist approach assumes that all behaviour (i.e. responses) are learnt.
This is so confusing and annoying and giving me a massive headache.
Thanks in advance for any help
Last edited by username4961772; 1 year ago
0
reply
Report
#2
What's the confusion? You pretty much summed up the issue of the behaviourist approach, which is what that question is asking - not for support of the argument but contradictions
0
reply
(Original post by Noodlzzz)
What's the confusion? You pretty much summed up the issue of the behaviourist approach, which is what that question is asking - not for support of the argument but contradictions
What's the confusion? You pretty much summed up the issue of the behaviourist approach, which is what that question is asking - not for support of the argument but contradictions
1
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
