The Student Room Group

Online dating: Why do men have such low standards?

Most men on Tinder seem to "like" the majority of women they come across, but come away with a success rate (right swipes vs dates) close to 10000:1.



6 years of Tinder as 17-23 guy in UK university






I'm a guy who has never used dating apps. I'm literally autistic, I'm not that handsome, I started out dating as a 21 year old virgin, I'm not even able to fake self-confidence, yet I have had more success approaching the occasional girl in real life (basically girls who I have a genuine crush on) than these people have on all their years trying to net everything on Tinder.

Why do guys put themselves through such humiliation? I know it really takes a lot to ask people out irl, but compared to the massive crush to your ego and self-worth from the completely lopsided online dating world... isn't it a no-brainer?

[video="youtube;qJQ4GSt3xBk"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJQ4GSt3xBk[/video]
If it took me 10,000 swipes to get a girlfriend I'd do it. If I could swipe at the rate of about 1 every 10 seconds.

But yes I totally agree with your main point. Meetings in real life are - overall - a better way for men and women to find love.

And well done in recognising that you have an autistic condition, and in being open and upfront about it. And above all in your attitude to it and getting on with your life as best you can.
Because men are desperate for a bit of skirt.

I have a grand plan. Wear down TSR member(s) over a number of months. Like the Fabian Strategy.
Reply 3
Original post by Anonymous
Most men on Tinder seem to "like" the majority of women they come across, but come away with a success rate (right swipes vs dates) close to 10000:1.



6 years of Tinder as 17-23 guy in UK university






I'm a guy who has never used dating apps. I'm literally autistic, I'm not that handsome, I started out dating as a 21 year old virgin, I'm not even able to fake self-confidence, yet I have had more success approaching the occasional girl in real life (basically girls who I have a genuine crush on) than these people have on all their years trying to net everything on Tinder.

Why do guys put themselves through such humiliation? I know it really takes a lot to ask people out irl, but compared to the massive crush to your ego and self-worth from the completely lopsided online dating world... isn't it a no-brainer?

[video="youtube;qJQ4GSt3xBk"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJQ4GSt3xBk[/video]



1) Tinder makes it incredibly easy for men to hit on women. Just literally move your thumb and you've done it
2) With so much competition from other thirsty males the best workaround with the least amount of effort is for men to simply lower their standards, become even thirstier and swipe more
3) Majority of men are swiping on girls they want to have sex with rather than girls they actually want proper relationships with
4) There are more men than women on these apps
5) More and more millennials are unable to hit on girls in real life due to their balls never dropping as they spend all their time online so they have to use dating apps to interact with women in a romantic way as they have no confidence to do it ofline, and they can't be too picky due to competition hence low standards..
Reply 4
Original post by ANM775
1) Tinder makes it incredibly easy for men to hit on women. Just literally move your thumb and you've done it


Hitting on women on Tinder is far less easy to turn into a date. At 1000 swipes per date, you are looking at RSI. It's like most men haven't even tried it in real life. As much as I think "pick up artists" offer dangerous advice, they at least recognise that real life is the best place to approach dating.

By the point that you have exhausted the equivalent of an entire city's of women, and only got a dozen dates, isn't that just a crazy blow to your self-esteem?

3) Majority of men are swiping on girls they want to have sex with rather than girls they actually want proper relationships with


But a relationship seemingly results in far, far more sex than Tinder. If you were really desperate to f*** different people each time, you could still dump her after the first bang anyway.
Reply 5
Well... to be honest... the pretty ones have such dreadful personalities. They are so use to clicking a finger and men come running.
Reply 6
Original post by Anonymous
Hitting on women on Tinder is far less easy to turn into a date. At 1000 swipes per date, you are looking at RSI. It's like most men haven't even tried it in real life. As much as I think "pick up artists" offer dangerous advice, they at least recognise that real life is the best place to approach dating.

By the point that you have exhausted the equivalent of an entire city's of women, and only got a dozen dates, isn't that just a crazy blow to your self-esteem?



It's true, it's harder to turn a tinder match into a date than a phone number from a random woman into a date. but it's easier to swipe 1000 - 2000 women than approach 50+ random women IRL [for a date]

it's also true that yes, you'll soon come into problems with exhausting the supply of women in your area
Tinder is a hookup app.
With many users simply trying to accumulate mass ons in a very short time frame.
Many guys operating next to no standards at all beyond breathing, biological female.
Reply 8
Original post by ANM775
It's true, it's harder to turn a tinder match into a date than a phone number from a random woman into a date. but it's easier to swipe 1000 - 2000 women than approach 50+ random women IRL [for a date]

it's also true that yes, you'll soon come into problems with exhausting the supply of women in your area

It's maybe approaching 50 women per date if you "cold approach" (never tried it). But so far even I have rarely been turned down when I "warm approach" girls who I have talked to a little (under 2 approaches per date). The necessary investment is simply spending time with a hobby/etc that involves some women - something that is enjoyable even without looking out for women. The risk in approaching here is a blow to your ego, and losing what might otherwise have been a friendship. But I think the blow to my ego would be far worse if an app told me that I had been rejected by 60,000 women.
Reply 9
Original post by londonmyst
Tinder is a hookup app.
With many users simply trying to accumulate mass ons in a very short time frame.
Many guys operating next to no standards at all beyond breathing, biological female.

This is why I am excited for sex bots. No plans to use one myself, but it will immediately turn the dating tables very roundly in favour of men.
Reply 10
Original post by Anonymous
It's maybe approaching 50 women per date if you "cold approach" (never tried it). But so far even I have rarely been turned down when I "warm approach" girls who I have talked to a little (under 2 approaches per date). The necessary investment is simply spending time with a hobby/etc that involves some women - something that is enjoyable even without looking out for women. The risk in approaching here is a blow to your ego, and losing what might otherwise have been a friendship. But I think the blow to my ego would be far worse if an app told me that I had been rejected by 60,000 women.


Yeah, cold approach is notoriously poor for conversion rates. It will take a lot of men more than 50 approaches tbh. I've done more than that ..with no dates from it



When I asked women out that I met on a socialising site however, it took me 6

[i simply sent them a msg after the event]

1 had a bf
2 didn't reply
1 told me meet her at another event
1 i met up with thinking it was a date but she thought it was a friends meetup
1 i went on a date with
Reply 11
Initially It was mostly the most physically attractive ones, but after a while I did become more flexible with my standards. I would actually say there was little correlation between looks and receptiveness of women [when I did the approaching], so much so that it became just not "worth it" to aim for a girl you arn't really into but are strategically approaching because she's not super attractive and you think she'll have low standards, ...because if she doesn't, that blow to the ego hits you 3 times as hard as if you'd just approached a stunner and got rejected.

cold approach for me just yielded phone numbers with no girls actually following up.
the only time there was follow up with cold approach is when girls cold approached me :/

that's why i always say personality means nothing.....
Reply 12
Original post by Andrew97
Because men are desperate for a bit of skirt.

I have a grand plan. Wear down TSR member(s) over a number of months. Like the Fabian Strategy.


can i join in, wearing people down is my specialty
Original post by ANM775
that's why i always say personality means nothing.....

For 'cold approaching'? Isn't that obvious? They can't know anything about your personality - your looks are the only thing they have to go on.
Reply 14
Original post by Anonymous
For 'cold approaching'? Isn't that obvious? They can't know anything about your personality - your looks are the only thing they have to go on.


with cold approach You'd get a chance to speak to a lot of them and display your personallity though
Original post by Dunnig Kruger
If it took me 10,000 swipes to get a girlfriend I'd do it. If I could swipe at the rate of about 1 every 10 seconds.

It's not an automatic gf mate. You have all the other stuff too - the swiping is a substitute only for approaching girls irl.
Original post by Anonymous
It's not an automatic gf mate. You have all the other stuff too - the swiping is a substitute only for approaching girls irl.

Yeah and the study by Queen Mary University in 2016 showed a male heterosexual swipe success rate of 0.6%, which is 60 times higher than the 0.01% (1 in 10000) success rate that you suggested in the opening post.

However if 1 in 60 successful swipes results in a girlfriend - which seems like a reasonable, conservative estimate, then we are singing off the same hymn sheet.

Ref: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/from-53-matches-to-4-dates-what-a-month-on-tinder-is-really-like-2018-03-13
Original post by ANM775
5) More and more millennials are unable to hit on girls in real life due to their balls never dropping as they spend all their time online so they have to use dating apps to interact with women in a romantic way as they have no confidence to do it ofline, and they can't be too picky due to competition hence low standards..

Going after girls like that is now a sex crime in Scotland.
https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=6195072
Original post by Dunnig Kruger
Yeah and the study by Queen Mary University in 2016 showed a male heterosexual swipe success rate of 0.6%, which is 60 times higher than the 0.01% (1 in 10000) success rate that you suggested in the opening post.

However if 1 in 60 successful swipes results in a girlfriend - which seems like a reasonable, conservative estimate, then we are singing off the same hymn sheet.


The study's definition of "success" is a match, rather than a date - which makes my original estimate of 1 in 10000 look a bit optimistic, because judging by the stats I've seen there isn't a date for every 60 matches.

https://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~tysong/files/Tinder.pdf

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending