Why do people see Conservatives as 'racist'? Watch

IH8Studying
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#81
Report 4 weeks ago
#81
Cause they are. Goodbye and goodnight!
1
reply
Neilos
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#82
Report 4 weeks ago
#82
It's generally people whose own bias leads them to view the mainstream as being in some way extreme. Bit like the way some Republicans in the USA call anyone the left of Donald Trump 'socialists'...

It'd be funny if they weren't making racism appear more widespread than it really is, making it seem trivial, insulting and smearing entirely normal people, etc.
0
reply
nathan_nacu
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#83
Report 4 weeks ago
#83
(Original post by IH8Studying)
Cause they are. Goodbye and goodnight!
and i oop— Tea ☕️

Tbh i wouldn’t say all conservatives are racist but honestly so many of the mindsets of conservatives or their views on certain issues are rather polarised, often nationalist, to euphemise and rooted in some dislike of others from a different background 🤷🏽*♂️
2
reply
ساره
Badges: 17
Rep:
?
#84
Report 4 weeks ago
#84
(Original post by IH8Studying)
Cause they are. Goodbye and goodnight!
Yeah, most are.
1
reply
Burton Bridge
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#85
Report 4 weeks ago
#85
(Original post by QE2)
Childish!


Then it would no longer be Godwin's law. It would be "Bridge's Law". You really need to think about what you are saying.

[qAlso - out to lunch - temporarily not in command of one's mental faculties.[/quote
I'd like to see the source of your definition, but nevertheless it still means "insane".
The words "hole" digging" and "stop" spring to mind.

"No! "Out to lunch" does not mean "Insane", It means "not in command of you mental faculties".
Kinda like, "Irate" does not mean "angry", It just means "really annoyed".


Were you trying to make a point there?
Paragraph order

Yes you are.

Correct that's what I meant by rewriting godwins law to fit the type of person i was talking about! The penny drops, the mature thing to do now is apologise for you're insults and inability to comprehend, now you have been proven to of totally misunderstood the post, which was conversation with another poster, who understood it fine. If I was talking to you I'd of used more direct words to avoid this.



Ok

Name:  Screenshot_20191115-070511_Google.jpg
Views: 19
Size:  152.8 KB

The word temporarily is key in my selection of the term. I notice you completely remove that above, very typical of you to do this. So, now I'm going to ask you another question you will ignore, because everytime blow of hole in the QE2 (quite often) you ignore the questions you domt like, I asked this before but anyway;

Why do you consistently remove context to make a point that is fallacious or, in other cases, to defeat a veow point that's not even being made?

You do this over and over and it just makes you look stupid, just like you have made yourself look here.
Last edited by Burton Bridge; 4 weeks ago
0
reply
QE2
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#86
Report 4 weeks ago
#86
(Original post by Burton Bridge)
Paragraph order
Look, just split the quotes like any normal person.

Correct that's what I meant by rewriting godwins law to fit the type of person i was talking about!
Why bring Godwin's Law into it then? It's not Godwin's law and it doesn't apply to people or situations covered by Godwin's Law. Presumably you have just become aware of Godwin's Law and hoped to sound clever. The most important thing about any law is knowing when and how to apply it.

The penny drops, the mature thing to do now
You've just spect the last few posts calling me childish and telling me to grow up, yet you expect me to to "the mature thing".
BBIAN™

now you have been proven to of totally misunderstood the post, is apologise for you're insults and inability to comprehend
"To have".
Why do you insist of using this incorrect form. I've pointed it out to you several times. What was that you were saying about "doing the mature thing, etc"?

The word temporarily is key in my selection of the term. I notice you completely remove that above, very typical of you to do this. So, now I'm going to ask you another question you will ignore, because everytime blow of hole in the QE2 (quite often) you ignore the questions you domt like, I asked this before but anyway;
Not sure what your point is.

1. Adding "temporarily" does not remove the tautological error. "Eye, insane is one explanation! Or maybe temporarily insane". See? Your argument makes no sense (which we could have assumed before even examining it).
2. "Temporarily insane" is still "insane". Surely all forms of insanity are potentially temporary.
3. None of these mainstream definitions include the word "temporary".
https://www.macmillandictionary.com/...h/out-to-lunch
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dic...e-out-to-lunch
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/out+to+lunch
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/di...h/out-to-lunch
https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/out-to-lunch

Why do you consistently remove context to make a point that is fallacious or, in other cases, to defeat a veow point that's not even being made?
You do this over and over and it just makes you look stupid, just like you have made yourself look here.
I simply remove the parts of your post that I am not responding to, so it makes sense to the reader. If you think I am "removing context", please give examples and explain how it changed the meaning of what you wrote.

Thanks.
0
reply
IH8Studying
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#87
Report 4 weeks ago
#87
(Original post by nathan_nacu)
and i oop— Tea ☕️

Tbh i wouldn’t say all conservatives are racist but honestly so many of the mindsets of conservatives or their views on certain issues are rather polarised, often nationalist, to euphemise and rooted in some dislike of others from a different background 🤷🏽*♂️
no no listen to me hun, they ALL are.
0
reply
Burton Bridge
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#88
Report 4 weeks ago
#88
(Original post by QE2)
Look, just split the quotes like any normal person.


Why bring Godwin's Law into it then? It's not Godwin's law and it doesn't apply to people or situations covered by Godwin's Law. Presumably you have just become aware of Godwin's Law and hoped to sound clever. The most important thing about any law is knowing when and how to apply it.


You've just spect the last few posts calling me childish and telling me to grow up, yet you expect me to to "the mature thing".
BBIAN™


"To have".
Why do you insist of using this incorrect form. I've pointed it out to you several times. What was that you were saying about "doing the mature thing, etc"?


Not sure what your point is.

1. Adding "temporarily" does not remove the tautological error. "Eye, insane is one explanation! Or maybe temporarily insane". See? Your argument makes no sense (which we could have assumed before even examining it).
2. "Temporarily insane" is still "insane". Surely all forms of insanity are potentially temporary.
3. None of these mainstream definitions include the word "temporary".
https://www.macmillandictionary.com/...h/out-to-lunch
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dic...e-out-to-lunch
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/out+to+lunch
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/di...h/out-to-lunch
https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/out-to-lunch


I simply remove the parts of your post that I am not responding to, so it makes sense to the reader. If you think I am "removing context", please give examples and explain how it changed the meaning of what you wrote.

Thanks.
You know what dancehead was right, you are insane, you certainly have some mental condition, I feel sorry for you. I dont see a point in carrying this conversation on, I'm sure you will take this as some type of victory or proof I cannot debate but it's really isnt.

Good day, I wish you well.
Last edited by Burton Bridge; 4 weeks ago
0
reply
username4977980
Badges: 7
Rep:
?
#89
Report 4 weeks ago
#89
(Original post by Boredman6)
Actually Brexit seems more racist towards Europeans rather than Islamic people or other ethnic groups.
If people voted Brexit to get rid of Indians, Pakistan's, Arabs and blacks then they are pretty stupid.
You're right. They are pretty damn stupid.
0
reply
username4977980
Badges: 7
Rep:
?
#90
Report 4 weeks ago
#90
(Original post by the bear)
the Labour party is seen as a haven for people who hate the Jews ? that's kinda racist i guess ?

:dontknow:
Repeating what the daily mail says is not classed as evidence. I don't know whether to congratulate the tories on their excellent propoganda or to cry because of how gullible people are.
1
reply
nathan_nacu
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#91
Report 4 weeks ago
#91
(Original post by AJ126y)
Repeating what the daily mail says is not classed as evidence. I don't know whether to congratulate the tories on their excellent propoganda or to cry because of how gullible people are.
This deserves 100 reps
0
reply
QE2
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#92
Report 4 weeks ago
#92
(Original post by Burton Bridge)
You know what dancehead was right, you are insane, you certainly have some mental condition, I feel sorry for you. I dont see a point in carrying this conversation on,
Interesting. Rather than respond to my rational and reasonable points which dismantled your arguments, you call me "insane" and refuse to respond further.

I'm sure you will take this as some type of victory or proof I cannot debate but it's really isnt.
Well, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...
BTW, I had long since come to that conclusion. Your latest demonstration merely confirms it.
0
reply
Burton Bridge
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#93
Report 4 weeks ago
#93
(Original post by QE2)
Interesting. Rather than respond to my rational and reasonable points which dismantled your arguments, you call me "insane" and refuse to respond further.


Well, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...
BTW, I had long since come to that conclusion. Your latest demonstration merely confirms it.
But you're points are not rational and reasonable and you haven't dismantled a thing.
0
reply
QE2
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#94
Report 4 weeks ago
#94
(Original post by Burton Bridge)
But you're points are not rational and reasonable and you haven't dismantled a thing.
But you would say that, wouldn't you?
0
reply
1st superstar
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#95
Report 4 weeks ago
#95
Why don't QE2, Burton Bridge and @Boredman6 become FHs for debates they seem to love them
0
reply
LiberOfLondon
Badges: 17
Rep:
?
#96
Report 4 weeks ago
#96
Look! It's the institutionally racist Conservative and Republican parties!
0
reply
LiberOfLondon
Badges: 17
Rep:
?
#97
Report 4 weeks ago
#97
(Original post by QE2)
Only by Tory propagandists. Not by rational people.

Vote Johnson, get Hitler. Which means that it is actually the Tories who hate Jews.
QED.
https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/d...emitic-1.62106
Ahem.
0
reply
QE2
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#98
Report 4 weeks ago
#98
Ironically enough, the anti-semitism displayed regarding that mural is from those who assume that any depiction of bankers and industrialists oppressing the workers must necessarily be referring to Jews.
Shame on you!
0
reply
QE2
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#99
Report 4 weeks ago
#99
So because there have been BME officers in the Met for decades, any accusations of institutional racism must be false?
0
reply
Haider_A
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#100
Report 4 weeks ago
#100
A lot of the party members have publicly expressed racist and derogatory remarks towards ethnic minorities, immigrants and religious groups; if that's not racist, I don't what is.
1
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Did you vote in the 2019 general election?

Yes (344)
46.11%
No (80)
10.72%
I'm not old enough (322)
43.16%

Watched Threads

View All