The Student Room Group

Lefties, come on in. See how your notions of rehabilitation have worked so well.

Scroll to see replies

Original post by looloo2134
Also males do not have control over their penis so a woman can force a man penis inside her.


It's so sad and sexist that rape laws in this country allow women to not only rape men, but children as well without being charged with rape. It is worth noting that it's not just the UK that has these sexist laws. Most countries around the world have the same sexist laws including one I espouse, Israel. In Israel women are also immune from prosecution for rape. Feminists in Israel have, to my knowledge, twice in the past ten years prevented changes to these laws that would allow women to be charged with rape.

http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape

I never knew about this rape not applying to women issue until I came across it on this forum. I am so grateful to the guy that brought this issue to attention. I no longer see him on here, which is sad. In the highly unlikely event that he does read this comment I wish he would know that his posts have had a huge impact on my life and on my way of thinking.
(edited 4 years ago)
Original post by 1st superstar
However in relations to the abortion example example you gave I can sort of see why I would get priority as will probably have to lie down for 6-12hrs trying to give birth to a child I most probably never wanted will the man have to do that?

In equality everyone has the same rights. If a mother is given a right, then the father in equality must be given that same right irrespective of the differences between them.

Feminists claim they pursue equality. Hence they should want mothers and fathers to have the same rights, but they don't. Therefore, they do not want equality. I am only rebutting their claims. They claim they want equality and I am proving that they in fact don't.
(edited 4 years ago)
Original post by Pinkisk
It's so sad and sexist that rape laws in this country allow women to not only rape men, but children as well without being charged with rape. It is worth noting that it's not just the UK that has these sexist laws. Most countries around the world have the same sexist laws including one I espouse, Israel. In Israel women are also immune from prosecution for rape. Feminists in Israel have, to my knowledge, twice in the past ten years prevented changes to these laws that would allow women to be charged with rape.

http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape

I never knew about this rape not applying to women issue until I came across it on this forum. I am so grateful to the guy that brought this issue to attention. I no longer see him on here, which is sad. In the highly unlikely event that he does read this comment I wish he would know that his posts have had a huge impact on my life and on my way of thinking.

Who was that person, who brought it to your attention?
Original post by 1st superstar
Who was that person, who brought it to your attention?

Embarrassingly, I do not remember his name. It was a long time ago, like two or three years.
Original post by Pinkisk
Embarrassingly, I do not remember his name. It was a long time ago, like two or three years.

Oh ok fair enough
Original post by imlikeahermit
Why do all feminists like shown in the picture look the same?

Cult mentality/Group think.

Feminism controls every aspect of its followers' lives, their identity, the way that they dress, the careers that they should and should not pursue, the way that they worship, the way that they form relationships, they way that they should behave with the opposite sex, the way that they should treat their children, the way that they should have sexual intercourse, etc etc. Feminism controls every aspect of its followers' lives. Anyone that does not toe the line within the movement is abused, marginalised and ostracised. This is why they all look, walk and talk the exact same. Every feminist that I have ever come across and I have made it my business to mix with them as much as I possibly can has been the exact copy of every other feminist. Feminism robs its followers of their distinct identity.

One easily observable way in which feminism exercises control on its followers is the bowl haircut. It encourages its followers to adopt these haircuts for two reasons both of which focus on denying the follower distinction from other feminists and discouraging them from critical thinking. These two reasons are outlined below:

1. To minimise sex distinction and appear androgynous

One of the fundamental principles on which feminism is based is the idea that gender is a social construct i.e. there is no such thing as man or woman. Feminism teaches its followers that we are all born androgynous (without sex) and that we all undergo socialisation by what they call the patriarchy. This socialisation, they claim, turns us into men and women, two social constructs, one destined to command the other to obey.

“You are not born a woman; you become one… No feminist questions the statement that women are manufactured by civilisation, not biologically determined.” Simone De Beauvoir, All Said and Done, 1972.

One of the principle aims of the feminist revolution is to turn society into an androgynous one where people abandon any practices that lead to distinctions between the sexes.

“the development of cooperative human community based on the free-flow of natural androgynous eroticism” Andrea Dworkin, Woman Hating, Androgyny, 1974.

To minimise gender distinction, women are encouraged to become more male in their appearance and men are encouraged to become more female in their appearance. Women are encouraged to dress in clothing lacking colour, avoid putting on makeup and have bowl or bald haircuts to appear less female and more male and men are encouraged to become less masculine in their traits.

“If you must wear dresses… they should be plain in style and colour… Bright colours and delightful materials are wonderful to have around, but do you really want to decorate your BODY with them? On your body they cry out, "Look at me…I'm female." No More Fun and Games - A Journal of Female Liberation, Editorial, 1970.

https://medium.com/s/pop-feminism/the-future-is-androgynous-but-wtf-does-that-even-mean-60a3edab8ba8

https://thehardtimes.net/blog/how-a-diy-asymmetrical-haircut-eliminate-my-white-privilege/

https://www.byrdie.com/ruby-rose-interview-androgynous

Pictures of Feminist icons adopting the androgynous haircuts/looks:

Marlyn Frye

Shiela Jeffreys:

Charlotte Bunch:

Daphne Patai:

Jill Johnston:


2. Dress code, cult mentality

Cult like ideologies often impose a dress code on their members. This allows cults control over the most intimate aspect of a person’s life, their identity. A dress code, other than allowing power and control over members, also serves two further functions for cults/ideologies. The first function is to lure people into the group. People sporting unconventional appearances and attire attract attention. This attention acts as a form of advertisement for the cult/ideology. The second function of dress codes is to encourage Group Think, a practice which pressures members of a cult/ideology to accept authority and toe the line adopted by the rest of the group. Group Think discourages critical thinking, individuality and creativity.

The Heaven’s Gate, doomsday cult that committed mass suicide in 1997, imposed a similar, androgynous dress code and haircuts on its members to that of feminism:

(edited 4 years ago)
Original post by Pinkisk
In equality everyone has the same rights. If a mother is given a right, then the father in equality must be given that same right irrespective of the differences between them.

Feminists claim they pursue equality. Hence they should want mothers and fathers to have the same rights, but they don't. Therefore, they do not want equality. I am only rebutting their claims. They claim they want equality and I am proving that they in fact don't.

Agreed (but read the 2nd part of my reply you quoted)... I mean HECK YEAH I loved feminism before the 2000's but now especially since 2010 it's just become a P.O.S movement we should be be putting up women WITHOUT having to put men down (which is exactly what modern day feminism is doing putting men (and potentially those from ethic minorites) down). Feminism has now become a social media whine fest no longer the justice movement it was 50-100 years ago... Which is sad 😶
(edited 4 years ago)
@1st superstar how old are you
Original post by Glaz
@1st superstar how old are you

The same age, sex and zodiac sign as you are hello fellow 16 year old Cancerian
Rehabilitation is more of a starter point rather than a full solution. If they cannot improve by rehab, then and only then should they continue to stay in prison.
Original post by sharksies
Rehabilitation is more of a starter point rather than a full solution. If they cannot improve by rehab, then and only then should they continue to stay in prison.

Agreed
Original post by Pinkisk
Cult mentality/Group think.

Feminism controls every aspect of its followers' lives, their identity, the way that they dress, the careers that they should and should not pursue, the way that they worship, the way that they form relationships, they way that they should behave with the opposite sex, the way that they should treat their children, the way that they should have sexual intercourse, etc etc. Feminism controls every aspect of its followers' lives. Anyone that does not toe the line within the movement is abused, marginalised and ostracised. This is why they all look, walk and talk the exact same. Every feminist that I have ever come across and I have made it my business to mix with them as much as I possibly can has been the exact copy of every other feminist. Feminism robs its followers of their distinct identity.

One easily observable way in which feminism exercises control on its followers is the bowl haircut. It encourages its followers to adopt these haircuts for two reasons both of which focus on denying the follower distinction from other feminists and discouraging them from critical thinking. These two reasons are outlined below:

1. To minimise sex distinction and appear androgynous

One of the fundamental principles on which feminism is based is the idea that gender is a social construct i.e. there is no such thing as man or woman. Feminism teaches its followers that we are all born androgynous (without sex) and that we all undergo socialisation by what they call the patriarchy. This socialisation, they claim, turns us into men and women, two social constructs, one destined to command the other to obey.

“You are not born a woman; you become one… No feminist questions the statement that women are manufactured by civilisation, not biologically determined.” Simone De Beauvoir, All Said and Done, 1972.

One of the principle aims of the feminist revolution is to turn society into an androgynous one where people abandon any practices that lead to distinctions between the sexes.

“the development of cooperative human community based on the free-flow of natural androgynous eroticism” Andrea Dworkin, Woman Hating, Androgyny, 1974.

To minimise gender distinction, women are encouraged to become more male in their appearance and men are encouraged to become more female in their appearance. Women are encouraged to dress in clothing lacking colour, avoid putting on makeup and have bowl or bald haircuts to appear less female and more male and men are encouraged to become less masculine in their traits.

“If you must wear dresses… they should be plain in style and colour… Bright colours and delightful materials are wonderful to have around, but do you really want to decorate your BODY with them? On your body they cry out, "Look at me…I'm female." No More Fun and Games - A Journal of Female Liberation, Editorial, 1970.

https://medium.com/s/pop-feminism/the-future-is-androgynous-but-wtf-does-that-even-mean-60a3edab8ba8

https://thehardtimes.net/blog/how-a-diy-asymmetrical-haircut-eliminate-my-white-privilege/

https://www.byrdie.com/ruby-rose-interview-androgynous

Pictures of Feminist icons adopting the androgynous haircuts/looks:

Marlyn Frye

Shiela Jeffreys:

Charlotte Bunch:

Daphne Patai:

Jill Johnston:


2. Dress code, cult mentality

Cult like ideologies often impose a dress code on their members. This allows cults control over the most intimate aspect of a person’s life, their identity. A dress code, other than allowing power and control over members, also serves two further functions for cults/ideologies. The first function is to lure people into the group. People sporting unconventional appearances and attire attract attention. This attention acts as a form of advertisement for the cult/ideology. The second function of dress codes is to encourage Group Think, a practice which pressures members of a cult/ideology to accept authority and toe the line adopted by the rest of the group. Group Think discourages critical thinking, individuality and creativity.

The Heaven’s Gate, doomsday cult that committed mass suicide in 1997, imposed a similar, androgynous dress code and haircuts on its members to that of feminism:



😂😂 woah come on they're not that bad...
No it shouldn’t . And I assume there are few countries in the world where it would ? I stand to be corrected and shocked.A man is far far less likely to suffer psychological damage from the rape part of that crime . Having @ gun held to their head is another matter of course. But if a woman raped a man while he was drunk it should depend on who the woman is and why she did it and on the psychological damage the man has suffered .However most male rape is at the hands of other males of course and that is definitely another matter .That almost certainly would be immensely psychologically damaging and should be treated at least as seriously as male on female rape.
Original post by Wired_1800
That is fair. I think the two that deserve automatic death is murder and pedophilia. The others should be jail term according to a jury.

Why should someone get sent to jail for incest just because you find it disgusting? That is pathetic.

Two consenting adults should be able to do what they want with each other without the law getting involved.
Original post by lesijuyt
Why should someone get sent to jail for incest just because you find it disgusting? That is pathetic.

Two consenting adults should be able to do what they want with each other without the law getting involved.

What? This is disgusting.
Original post by Wired_1800
What? This is disgusting.

So you think just because you find an consensual act between adults disgusting that they should be sent to prison for it?

There are people in Russia who think gays should be sent to to prison just because they find homosexual acts disgusting.

It's just complete hypocrisy to call those homophobes in Russia a disgrace while you yourself are wanting people sent to prison for consensual incest acts.
Original post by lesijuyt
Why should someone get sent to jail for incest just because you find it disgusting? That is pathetic.

Two consenting adults should be able to do what they want with each other without the law getting involved.

lmao - why people go to jail for incest? you must be smoking some strong stuff

Original post by BlueIndigoViolet
lmao - why people go to jail for incest? you must be smoking some strong stuff


I just don't think society has a right to put two consenting adults in prison just for doing something that society simply finds disgusting.

People are massive hypocrites to criticize countries that imprison people for doing consensual gays acts however at the same time support imprisonment for consensual incest.
Original post by lesijuyt
I just don't think society has a right to put two consenting adults in prison just for doing something that society simply finds disgusting.

People are massive hypocrites to criticize countries that imprison people for doing consensual gays acts however at the same time support for consensual incest.

whats wrong with gay people? what is this argument...

Don't worry, I'm sure you can emigrate with your family member for a holiday for some *time alone* lol

Gay people cannot be compared to incest, the latter produces serious genetic deformities...




Autopsy of Charles II : "did not contain a single drop of blood; his heart was the size of a peppercorn; his lungs corroded; his intestines rotten and gangrenous; he had a single testicle, black as coal, and his head was full of water."
Original post by lesijuyt
So you think just because you find an consensual act between adults disgusting that they should be sent to prison for it?

There are people in Russia who think gays should be sent to to prison just because they find homosexual acts disgusting.

It's just complete hypocrisy to call those homophobes in Russia a disgrace while you yourself are wanting people sent to prison for consensual incest acts.

Incest is bad and dangerous with issues such as inbreeding problems.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending