leanouillle
Badges: 2
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#1
Hi everyone,I just wanted to ask you something, because it interests me but I can't find a solution. I wanted to know why the Court of Appeal did convict the wife in the case of Meeking. I mean, what have been recognize is negligence, so why the Court didn't try to convict her under the gross negligence manslaughter.Thank you if you could help me!! (and sorry, English is my second language)
0
reply
Surnia
Badges: 19
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report 2 years ago
#2
Gross negligence manslaughter is usually in circumstances where the defendent had a duty of care to the victim, eg the defendent was a health care professional or connected to the workplace where a death happens. The Meekings being husband and wife doesn't count.

It was manslaughter because pulling on the handbrake at 60mph was considered an act that anyone could foresee had serious risk of causing harm.
Last edited by Surnia; 2 years ago
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest

What is missing from the school curriculum?

Basic life skills (eg. cooking) (39)
20.21%
Financial skills (eg. taxes, budgeting) (95)
49.22%
First aid skills (17)
8.81%
Personal safety skills (7)
3.63%
Sign language (19)
9.84%
Expanded sexual health/relationships (13)
6.74%
Something else (tell us in the thread) (3)
1.55%

Watched Threads

View All