Go to Queen's because that's where all the cool people apply.
The really cool people know where the apostrophe goes.
Anyway, I loved Clare and it's generally pretty good for NatSci. Queens' is a fairly fun college as well though, and both are very good from the social point of view.
The really cool people know where the apostrophe goes.
Anyway, I loved Clare and it's generally pretty good for NatSci. Queens' is a fairly fun college as well though, and both are very good from the social point of view.
Queens' Cambridge was founded by two queens - Margaret of Anjou and Elizabeth Woodville - hence the apostrophe at the end. Queen's Oxford is named just for Philippa of Hainault, so the apostrophe is in a different place.
Clare is wonderful. Anyone you'd come in contact with from the college is really nice and supportive (porters, support staff, bedders, senior tutor etc.) and I don't have anything negative to say about them. The college treat us really well and the support within college is outstanding.
Fwiw, as a member of a graduate college many people would struggle to name amongst the university suspects, I walk across the bridge of sighs every day on my way to the department.
It's perfectly possible to live vicariously. Just get in.
So I'm guessing that applying to both Trinity and St John's would be bad seeing as if one turns me down, by the time my application is passed onto the second choice it could well be the case they may be full up?
Would you therefore suggest I apply to a category A college and category B college? or A and C?
The ones I'm considering are:
Cat A: Trinity or St John's (I really can't pick between the two)
Cat B: Jesus, Corpus Christi, Gonville and Caius, Peterhouse, Jesus, Sidney Sussex (basically because they all seem very old and traditional).
Pardon me, but this is well-established nonsense. TSR threads have exhaustively noted that none of the colleges is 'less picky' - some just have fewer high-calibre candidates applying in the first place, so they have to take, by the same admissions criteria, from the pool. It's why there is a pool.
Also, what exactly is meant by 'less established'? Fair enough, Homerton is a newbie, but Girton? So 1869 is somehow less established than who, Churchill (1958)? Fitzwilliam (1966)? Robinson (1977)? Sorry to pick holes, but if you want to sell yourself as helping people to get into oxbridge, you want to make sure your information is good.
Thanks for your comment. You're perfectly free to say what you think and so am I, isn't that the why forums exist anyway, to encourage debate? Your reference to the fact that fewer high-calibre candidates apply to some colleges does mean that they are in fact less picky - they have less students to choose from which means less competition. It's going to be easier to stand out because there are fewer candidates from which the admissions tutor is going to have to discriminate between.
And by less established I meant by reputation in the public mind not by date. And hey, I'm just trying to help people out, just like you, so no need to be overly critical.
Thanks for your comment. You're perfectly free to say what you think and so am I, isn't that the why forums exist anyway, to encourage debate? Your reference to the fact that fewer high-calibre candidates apply to some colleges does mean that they are in fact less picky - they have less students to choose from which means less competition. It's going to be easier to stand out because there are fewer candidates from which the admissions tutor is going to have to discriminate between.
And by less established I meant by reputation in the public mind not by date. And hey, I'm just trying to help people out, just like you, so no need to be overly critical.
Admissions stats regarding applicant numbers between colleges fluctuate randomly a fair bit from one year to the next. More importantly, the pool system is designed to mean that an applicant is competing against all those applying to the university, not the college - irrespective of how many people apply to individual colleges, and their "calibre".
With all respect, you're branding yourself as an independent source of getting-into-oxbridge advice... expect criticism should you be putting forward information which contradicts that of the university admissions tutors.
LOL no that was just purely coincidental. Oh I really can't make my mind up. I know applying is still a year or so away but the prospect is so exciting!
I really would like Trinity or St John's but applying to both would risk me missing out on the traditional college experience if I got an offer although in fairness, getting an offer of a place at Cambridge is far more important than the actual college.
It's odd, you keep saying this, and yet you are obsessed with the "best" colleges at Oxford AND Cambridge, AND you won't even apply for another year.
I know what can I do heh? Maybe it's an OCD or something need to pop some SSRIs down my throat.
I know it's a year off but obviously I need to start thinking now about my potential application and how to strengthen etc. I'm prepared to give it my all to get a place.
As for the "best" colleges, I wouldn't say the one's I'm picking are "the best" they just happen to be perceived as some of the grandest and I always set the bar high.
as a (terrified) history of art applicant currently wrestling with the additional personal statement. Any other history of art applicants applying to Clare? At first this discussion made me very happy with my choice, however I am also feeling rather sad about King's. Was unsure about whether to apply there or to Clare, and hearing about all the political tradition at King's has made me rather regretful.
Also - please don't laugh - I have a serious question; I attend a tiny Scottish state school with no Oxbridge tradition at all, so I don't know who else to ask: how is Clare pronounced? Like 'Claire' or like 'Claar'? Because goodness, THAT would make a bad impression at interview if I ever got that far . . .
Also - please don't laugh - I have a serious question; I attend a tiny Scottish state school with no Oxbridge tradition at all, so I don't know who else to ask: how is Clare pronounced? Like 'Claire' or like 'Claar'? Because goodness, THAT would make a bad impression at interview if I ever got that far . . .
It's pronounced like "Claire"
(You probably could get through your interviews without mentioning the name of the college actually but that's a side-point )