The Student Room Logo

The Big 'Which Cambridge College?' Thread

Scroll to see replies

fumblewomble
Downing College Music Society consists of a large number of who wish to be involved in performing music in and around Downing College . It consists primarily of an orchestra of varying size (depending on the genre performed) and a chorus who join the orchestra for larger scale works. Concerts made up of performances by the orchestra and chorus take place at the end of Michaelmas and Lent terms. In addition to this, soloists are given the opportunity to perform as part of a programme of recitals which are hosted by the Master in the Master's Lodge. Entrance to the Master's lodge recitals is free and refreshments are provided by the master afterwards. Anybody is welcome to participate in events organised by the society, regardless of ability or experience.
Contact: Millie Godlee (cbjg2)

http://www.downingjcr.co.uk/college/societies/
Downing also has a jazz band.

There are also the uni-wide groups so college choice isn't that important. There's plenty on university wide e.g. http://www.srcf.ucam.org/ucpo/ http://www.srcf.ucam.org/cuso/


Wow, that's great! That seems really good, thanks for all the info, you've definitely put my mind at rest (:
troffton
I row for monmouth school's 1st VIII, i pulled a 6.27 2K last time i did one(when i was 16).


Assuming you don't weigh some ridiculous amount or row like a retard or anything you'll probably slot straight into the first eight of pretty much any college then. The latest bumps results are here. Worth looking at the colleges with second boats near the first division because they'll have strength in depth and you'll almost certainly be in a fairly decent crew. Just for added confusion, LMBC is the boat club of St John's and First and Third is the boat club of Trinity.
Reply 802
Just wondering how emmanuel, gonville and caius, and magdalene compair for rugby and rowing?
I don't have a clue... but I think you'll have difficulty getting useful responses as colleges choose students on academic not sporting ability, and the turnover of students is so fast that a college that's top of the league can be bottom in a few years' time and vice versa.
Reply 804
i don't think any of them have a particular rep for rugby, but caius are the best for rowing
Reply 805
Yes Caius are good for rowing, but pretty dire at men's rugby atm, although if you're good enough there is university wide rugby that is at a much better standard (and they run both an U20's and U21's team)
Reply 806
there is also university wide rowing (if you're light enough) of course...
Reply 807
thefish_uk
I don't have a clue... but I think you'll have difficulty getting useful responses as colleges choose students on academic not sporting ability, and the turnover of students is so fast that a college that's top of the league can be bottom in a few years' time and vice versa.


While this is true, it is possible to maintain dominance for a long while, and if you are at a bad club, it is unlikely to progress unless they happen to get a few good people to drive it forwards.

For example, there are probably very few people who can remember the last time John's lost a rugby match, and recently Caius were head of the river for something like 6 consecutive years, they had one bad year, but are now back to second.

And colleges like Corpus will always be poor because they are small, for some reason Sidney is terrible at mens rowing (and rugby), despite seeming to have hundreds of novices each year.

A lot of this is funding as well, (Downing boat club apparently had a £100,000 budget this year, perhaps why they had a successful year), so if you take your sport seriously, then it would make sense to go to a college that is successful or has good facilities/funding.
paneity
While this is true, it is possible to maintain dominance for a long while, and if you are at a bad club, it is unlikely to progress unless they happen to get a few good people to drive it forwards.

For example, there are probably very few people who can remember the last time John's lost a rugby match, and recently Caius were head of the river for something like 6 consecutive years, they had one bad year, but are now back to second.

And colleges like Corpus will always be poor because they are small, for some reason Sidney is terrible at mens rowing (and rugby), despite seeming to have hundreds of novices each year.

A lot of this is funding as well, (Downing boat club apparently had a £100,000 budget this year, perhaps why they had a successful year), so if you take your sport seriously, then it would make sense to go to a college that is successful or has good facilities/funding.


Our Womens rowing on the other hand is very good, our W3 managed to bump up 11 during Mays.
troffton
Just wondering how emmanuel, gonville and caius, and magdalene compair for rugby and rowing?


Caius are one of the rowing top-dogs and nowhere for rugby. Emma might play rugby. If they do, no-one cares. And they're top ten/fifteen for mens rowing. Magdalene are generally ok for rugby (they tend to be in/around division 1 if not ever competitive in that division) and rowing (similarly division 1 without ever really getting near the top).
Arrogant Git
St John's have by a fair distance the best rugby club in Cambridge and probably will continue to do so for some time. Then you have Jesus who are also normally pretty good. Then any of Downing, Girton, Magdalene, Trinity Hall all normally field sides varying from quite good to pretty gash depending on the year. There might be one or two others in this category. Most other colleges either can't put out a team and combine with other colleges or vary between pretty gash and very gash.

Regarding rowing, it's the most popular sport in Cambridge so any college will have a decent first boat and it's hard to pick out any one college that will be good eighteen months from now.

That said, a bigger college will almost certainly put out a competent crew whereas a smaller college like Peterhouse might end up with a catastrophic first boat in a poor year. It's worth looking at the bumps charts- colleges near the top will be consistently reasonable year in year out. Also look at how many boats colleges put out. A college putting out six boats in mays probably has strength in depth and will be good even in the event of injuries. Which school do you row for?


Do you happen to know how good queens are at rugby?
Reply 811
Dogkicker91
Do you happen to know how good queens are at rugby?


Pretty good, they got to the final of (but I can't remember if they won or not) the second tear of cuppers (I think it's called the plate) They generally seem a nice bunch and they go on tour and stuff, and they're nice to their girls which is nice.
smilepea
Pretty good, they got to the final of (but I can't remember if they won or not) the second tear of cuppers (I think it's called the plate) They generally seem a nice bunch and they go on tour and stuff, and they're nice to their girls which is nice.


Ahhh that sounds pretty much perfect, as I dont want an awesome side I wont get into, but i don't want someone that gets whooped every match!
This is a bit of a silly question, but anyway...
I visited St. John's Open Day in June, and immediately knew it was the place I wanted to study; everyone was friendly and helpful, I had a really good feeling about the talk with the Director of Studies and loved the look of the college. But the next day I got talking with a student (from another college) who told me that St. John's 'looks good, but is filled with snobs'. That's really not the impression I got from the place, but then again I've only been there for a few hours...
She also warned me that getting in St. John's is very difficult, and that if I gained a place there was a big chance it would be in one of the colleges 'nobody wants to go to', because there are too many applicants per place at St. John's.
If I had not talked to that girl, I would definitely apply to St. John's, but now I'm a bit uncertain. All advice would be very much appreciated!
Reply 814
_Claudia_
This is a bit of a silly question, but anyway...
I visited St. John's Open Day in June, and immediately knew it was the place I wanted to study; everyone was friendly and helpful, I had a really good feeling about the talk with the Director of Studies and loved the look of the college. But the next day I got talking with a student (from another college) who told me that St. John's 'looks good, but is filled with snobs'. That's really not the impression I got from the place, but then again I've only been there for a few hours...
She also warned me that getting in St. John's is very difficult, and that if I gained a place there was a big chance it would be in one of the colleges 'nobody wants to go to', because there are too many applicants per place at St. John's.
If I had not talked to that girl, I would definitely apply to St. John's, but now I'm a bit uncertain. All advice would be very much appreciated!


What matters is what YOU thought of the place not what other people think of it, if you liked it apply there simple as. Every college has too many applications per place, you can't play a numbers game
fumblewomble
You can find out for yourself about statistics here http://www.cam.ac.uk/admissions/undergraduate/statistics/colleges.html#johns but make sure you've read my post on reading application statistics:


Like smilepea said, it's what you think that is important. St John's has a bit of a reputation (people sing a song with the words 'I'd rather be at Oxford than St John's') but there are actually some really nice people there, as you found out. Also, every intake is different so a lot will depend on who else applies in you year, something that nobody can know yet.


That's a really good point you make there about the statistics, thank you! I know you don't have a bigger chance of ending up in Cambridge when you apply to an unpopular college (as you proofed in your post :smile:), but what I was told is that when you apply to a popular college, you have a slighter chance of being accepted into your chosen college, and a bigger chance to be pooled. That does make sense, no?
However, I've decided I will go for St. John's. I've visited other colleges and they didn't feel as 'right' as St. John's did, so that should be enough :smile:
fumblewomble
It all depends on how good you are. The best students will get into their college no matter where they apply. If you're a bit lower than that then what you say does make some sense but remember that your standard remains a constant. If you're good enough then even if you get put into the pool you'll be picked out by another college.

I tried another (long) way of explaining it here:


You are right, and this does make me look at the process differently. Thank you so much! You really made me more at ease about it all :smile:
As the title says, I'm wondering what college is best to study NatSci. I already know that it doesn't make that much difference which college you choose, and that you'll be happy wherever you end up (if you're accepted, obviously) but I'm wondering if there are any colleges which are better. :smile:
Reply 818
Which Cambridge colleges might be more ready than others to accept someone aged 15-16 to read maths? (Assuming their academic ability isn't in dispute, of course!)

If anyone knows of a college that has accepted some very young undergraduates (or even just one) recently, please let me know!

Thanks!
Sidney Sussex
(edited 11 years ago)

Quick Reply