The Student Room Logo

The Big 'Which Cambridge College?' Thread

Scroll to see replies

Has it ever occurred to the majority of people that to the chavs, THEY are rahs?
Reply 1901
StormStryke
Has it ever occurred to the majority of people that to the chavs, THEY are rahs?


Lol exactly, chavs call everyone who's remotely decent rahs.
.Ali.
Lol chavs don't > rahs. Chavs are vile and disgusting, they're a plague on society. Bloody antisocial, uneducated pricks.

Why does wearing Jack Wills make someone pretentious? I wear Jack Wills. Also, at least so called 'Jack Wills wearing cliquey types' are cultured. Myself and my friends would much rather go out for a meal or to the theatre, than smash a bus-shelter because it makes us look "well 'ard bruv" or whatever tosh they say.

Blatant jealousy.


You're being a massive snob, to be honest. You are blurring the line between "chavs" and ordinary working-class people, of which there are as many decent ones as middle-class people. Don't turn this into a class war - you think you're better just because you can afford to go to the theatre and wear an overpriced hoodie?

What I hate most about the chavs v rahs debate is that essentially it is a warped class war. Rahs find chavs loathsome because they associate them with crime, because they wear cheap tacky clothes, because they are linked with a number of distasteful social problems (underage pregnancy, drug abuse and so on). All these things are products of poverty, to be pitied rather than hated.

Chavs, on the other hand, resent 'rahs' because they have money: they usually don't work themselves and rely extensively on their parents, they have long exotic holidays, spend money on overpriced consumerist nonsense like Jack Wills, go to private schools but often aren't especially intelligent, pay a lot to look good. All these things are products of wealth.

Actually, I find the working-class ("chav", as you so smugly denote them) resentment of those with money to throw around far more understandable than the revulsion felt by rich people towards poorer ones.

You call them "uneducated". They are uneducated because innercity schools tend to be useless and because poor children have a cr*ppy start in life at home. Stop curling your lip in revulsion that someone who might not have the cultural background and education, still less the money, to go to the theatre on a night out. I for one find you far more "vile" than any of them.
Reply 1903
OrdinaryDay
You're being a massive snob, to be honest. You are blurring the line between "chavs" and ordinary working-class people, of which there are as many decent ones as middle-class people. Don't turn this into a class war - you think you're better just because you can afford to go to the theatre and wear an overpriced hoodie?
I never said anything about decent working class people, I said 'chavs'. Yes, they are working class, but there are also a few working class people who are okay. That said though, class isn't just based on money, it's a lot of things. I think I'm better than chavs, yeah. But I think pretty much everyone is, not just myself. And lol it's not overpriced.

What I hate most about the chavs v rahs debate is that essentially it is a warped class war. Rahs find chavs loathsome because they associate them with crime, because they wear cheap tacky clothes, because they are linked with a number of distasteful social problems (underage pregnancy, drug abuse and so on). All these things are products of poverty, to be pitied rather than hated.
Oh, I'm sorry, should I embrace the fact that they're criminals who spoil the economy? :rolleyes: No, it's not to be pitied. You know the difference between right and wrong. If you don't get that at home, pick up a book on the topic, I'm sure it will say "CRIME IS WRONG" somewhere. Yeah they are associated with underage pregnancy and drug abuse, know why that annoys me? Because it's us who have to pay for it. Because the stupid girls sit on benefits for the rest of their lives in a council house, never working, spending OUR money on cheap booze and fags, having 5 more kids with 5 different fathers and bringing dragging them up to be little menaces. We have a free education system in the UK, no one has any excuse. If they choose to piss away their chances because they'd rather skip classes to be out with their little criminal "m8s" and wear their ASBOs like a badge of pride, not my problem, and I refuse to feel sorry for that.

Chavs, on the other hand, resent 'rahs' because they have money: they usually don't work themselves and rely extensively on their parents, they have long exotic holidays, spend money on overpriced consumerist nonsense like Jack Wills, go to private schools but often aren't especially intelligent, pay a lot to look good. All these things are products of wealth.
Which is so unbelievably ridic! Everyone has the chance to work hard and get money, resenting people because their parents have a brain in their head and don't waste their money on pathetic things like cheap white lightening or whatever they drink, Idk what it is lol, is pathetic. Obviously people are going to reply on their parents, where else will they get money from until they've finished their education? What's wrong with paying to look good? And lol Jack Wills isn't over priced, it's amazing, so yeah, bit of a fail.com there. Nothing wrong with private schools either. When I'm older I'll be sending mine there, because I'll want the best for my children, didn't realise that was so wrong...


Actually, I find the working-class ("chav", as you so smugly denote them) resentment of those with money to throw around far more understandable than the revulsion felt by rich people towards poorer ones.
No it's not, because they have chances to be decent and they don't take them. So they take it out on those who do. It's pathetic jealousy.

You call them "uneducated". They are uneducated because innercity schools tend to be useless and because poor children have a cr*ppy start in life at home. Stop curling your lip in revulsion that someone who might not have the cultural background and education, still less the money, to go to the theatre on a night out. I for one find you far more "vile" than any of them.

They can still try. They could apply for scholarships to public schools if the ones in their area are so awful. They're just so...un-classy (if that's a word). I don't look down on them because of their financial situation btw, it's because they're uneducated oiks who commit crime. And lol thanks for that one! :smile:
(edited 13 years ago)
.Ali.
I never said anything about decent working class people, I said 'chavs'. Yes, they are working class, but there are also a few working class people who are okay. That said though, class isn't just based on money, it's a lot of things. I think I'm better than chavs, yeah. But I think pretty much everyone is, not just myself. And lol it's not overpriced.

Oh, I'm sorry, should I embrace the fact that they're criminals who spoil the economy? :rolleyes: No, it's not to be pitied. You know the difference between right and wrong. If you don't get that at home, pick up a book on the topic, I'm sure it will say "CRIME IS WRONG" somewhere. Yeah they are associated with underage pregnancy and drug abuse, know why that annoys me? Because it's us who have to pay for it. Because the stupid girls sit on benefits for the rest of their lives in a council house, never working, spending OUR money on cheap booze and fags, having 5 more kids with 5 different fathers and bringing dragging them up to be little menaces. We have a free education system in the UK, no one has any excuse. If they choose to piss away their chances because they'd rather skip classes to be out with their little criminal "m8s" and wear their ASBOs like a badge of pride, not my problem, and I refuse to feel sorry for that.

Which is so unbelievably ridic! Everyone has the chance to work hard and get money, resenting people because their parents have a brain in their head and don't waste their money on pathetic things like cheap white lightening or whatever they drink, Idk what it is lol, is pathetic. Obviously people are going to reply on their parents, where else will they get money from until they've finished their education? What's wrong with paying to look good? And lol Jack Wills isn't over priced, it's amazing, so yeah, bit of a fail.com there. Nothing wrong with private schools either. When I'm older I'll be sending mine there, because I'll want the best for my children, didn't realise that was so wrong...


No it's not, because they have chances to be decent and they don't take them. So they take it out on those who do. It's pathetic jealousy.


They can still try. They could apply for scholarships to public schools if the ones in their area are so awful. They're just so...un-classy (if that's a word). I don't look down on them because of their financial situation btw, it's because they're uneducated oiks who commit crime. And lol thanks for that one! :smile:



*Every Rah and upperclass bigot looks proudly at your post*

:rofl:
Reply 1905
soonerthanlater
*Every Rah and upperclass bigot looks proudly at your post*

:rofl:


Well...good! Rahs and upperclass 'bigots' > chavs anyday.
.Ali.
I never said anything about decent working class people, I said 'chavs'. Yes, they are working class, but there are also a few working class people who are okay. That said though, class isn't just based on money, it's a lot of things. I think I'm better than chavs, yeah. But I think pretty much everyone is, not just myself. And lol it's not overpriced.



I'm at Cambridge and a sociology student. Would you like to discuss the body of research surrounding the notion of "class" - what it is, whether it remains important, what it is based on? You're a class snob but I think I have the prerogative to be an intellectual one, and I know a bit more about "class" as a concept than you do. The lifestyle we lead is based on our financial situation. You like the theatre because you can afford to go, and your parents have brought you up to like it because they can afford to go. The poorest in society will never have even been into a theatre. How on earth are they possibly supposed to develop a deep love for theatre?

Wilkinson and Pickett put it in the most simple way - they describe financial situation as being a skeleton of lifestyle, over which other stuff (your tastes in music, leisure, fashion, whatever) are gradually overlaid. Theatre and the Proms and, I don't know, polo matches gradually become associated with wealth and in the end are inseparable from them.

On a more important note... http://www.jackwills.com/Store/Browse.aspx?DepartmentId=Womens&CategoryId=Womens_BasicTees

£34 for a t-shirt? Why is it I can get one in H&M or Zara, or Topshop for under a tenner? Is it gold-lined?!

.Ali.


Oh, I'm sorry, should I embrace the fact that they're criminals who spoil the economy?


Yes, the bankers who plunged the nation into a sea of crippling debt... they were all horrendous chavs. Actually, the rich and powerful have the greatest impact on 'the economy', of course they do. Bankers and politicians, owners of big companies...

.Ali.

:rolleyes: No, it's not to be pitied. You know the difference between right and wrong. If you don't get that at home, pick up a book on the topic, I'm sure it will say "CRIME IS WRONG" somewhere. Yeah they are associated with underage pregnancy and drug abuse, know why that annoys me? Because it's us who have to pay for it. Because the stupid girls sit on benefits for the rest of their lives in a council house, never working, spending OUR money on cheap booze and fags, having 5 more kids with 5 different fathers and bringing dragging them up to be little menaces. We have a free education system in the UK, no one has any excuse. If they choose to piss away their chances because they'd rather skip classes to be out with their little criminal "m8s" and wear their ASBOs like a badge of pride, not my problem, and I refuse to feel sorry for that.

Which is so unbelievably ridic! Everyone has the chance to work hard and get money, resenting people because their parents have a brain in their head and don't waste their money on pathetic things like cheap white lightening or whatever they drink, Idk what it is lol, is pathetic. Obviously people are going to reply on their parents, where else will they get money from until they've finished their education? What's wrong with paying to look good? And lol Jack Wills isn't over priced, it's amazing, so yeah, bit of a fail.com there. Nothing wrong with private schools either. When I'm older I'll be sending mine there, because I'll want the best for my children, didn't realise that was so wrong...


Pick up a book? Pick up a book? These are largely children who won't even have seen a book until they go to the local primary aged four. And at school they'll be nurtured out of this unfortunate beginning, yes? Unfortunately it's likely that big class sizes, a multitude of other uninspired infants and frustrated, sub-standard teachers will hinder their development rather than nurture it.

Intelligence tests on children have shown that if you have two babies of 18 months - a working class child, and a middle-class baby - and the poorer one outdoes the other on IQ measures, by the age of 4 the middle-class child will have caught up and by 10 he will be cleverer than his poorer counterpart. In other words, even naturally clever children are dragged down by their situations. Does this not make you angry? How is it not grossly unfair?

I'm not saying it's impossible to defy a very poor upbringing, but it is extremely difficult. As far as "everyone has the chance to work hard and earn money"... :rolleyes: shall we have a discussion on the literature of meritocracy? Does a meritocracy really exist, Ali? Do you really know anything about social mobility?


.Ali.


They can still try. They could apply for scholarships to public schools if the ones in their area are so awful. They're just so...un-classy (if that's a word). I don't look down on them because of their financial situation btw, it's because they're uneducated oiks who commit crime.


Their financial situation = being uneducated. You are such a moron, it hurts.
Reply 1907
Lead Pipes A Fortune Made
I suppose. But chavs, which there are an awful lot of round where I live, you can sort of ignore, dismiss them if they act like idiots and hang round street corners going "oioi yer mums a slaag." Also they generally don't think of themselves as 'better' than you...and if they do you can just laugh at them really.

Yeah I sort of understand that rahs are going to be everywhere in places like cambridge and the top unis, which is a bit annoying as it still proves we've got a looong way to go in making top higher ed instituions accessible to lower classes/income groups. I'd just out of the colleges I'm considering, go somewhere LESS private school/rah dominated than elsewhere.


I don't get this whole lower class uni gap. When you apply to uni your household income does not come into it.
Reply 1908
meh just go for queens it's on the river :smile:
Reply 1909
OrdinaryDay
I'm at Cambridge and a sociology student. Would you like to discuss the body of research surrounding the notion of "class" - what it is, whether it remains important, what it is based on? You're a class snob but I think I have the prerogative to be an intellectual one, and I know a bit more about "class" as a concept than you do. The lifestyle we lead is based on our financial situation. You like the theatre because you can afford to go, and your parents have brought you up to like it because they can afford to go. The poorest in society will never have even been into a theatre. How on earth are they possibly supposed to develop a deep love for theatre?
Yeah okay, lets discuss class. I'm not doubting that you've studied it more in depth than me, you're older than me for one, plus you're specialising in sociology, so yeah. Doesn't mean I don't know anything about it though. Yeah I agree, lifestyle is based on financial means. However, poor people could save what money they have and go out to an art gallery for example? Or make a picnic (not very expensive) and take their children to the country for a day? Also, the theatre isn't particularly expensive all the time, you can go to cheaper shows.


Wilkinson and Pickett put it in the most simple way - they describe financial situation as being a skeleton of lifestyle, over which other stuff (your tastes in music, leisure, fashion, whatever) are gradually overlaid. Theatre and the Proms and, I don't know, polo matches gradually become associated with wealth and in the end are inseparable from them.
Yeah, that's right. It doesn't mean you can't do cultured things if you're poor however. Maybe instead of appearing on Jeremy Kyle screaming about their ex not making payments, they could buy a couple of books and teach their children about politics, watch the news and keep up to date with current affairs. You don't have to be a millionaire to do that.

On a more important note... http://www.jackwills.com/Store/Browse.aspx?DepartmentId=Womens&CategoryId=Womens_BasicTees

£34 for a t-shirt? Why is it I can get one in H&M or Zara, or Topshop for under a tenner? Is it gold-lined?!
They're better quality, they don't go out of shape easily, the material feels nice, the stitching is done very well, and they make sure the stripes match up all the way around. I'm not just saying that before you say "that's what the marketing want you to think" or anything, I'm saying it because I have one of those t-shirts. I'd much rather wear those t-shirts tbh.


Yes, the bankers who plunged the nation into a sea of crippling debt... they were all horrendous chavs. Actually, the rich and powerful have the greatest impact on 'the economy', of course they do. Bankers and politicians, owners of big companies...

You know full well that's not what I was talking about. I was talking about benefit scroungers who don't work because they don't want to. They don't pay tax. They think the world owes them a living.


Pick up a book? Pick up a book? These are largely children who won't even have seen a book until they go to the local primary aged four. And at school they'll be nurtured out of this unfortunate beginning, yes? Unfortunately it's likely that big class sizes, a multitude of other uninspired infants and frustrated, sub-standard teachers will hinder their development rather than nurture it.
Omg, you can get a book for about £5. There's no excuse not to have books in the house. Also, local library? There are plenty of access routes to reading material.

Intelligence tests on children have shown that if you have two babies of 18 months - a working class child, and a middle-class baby - and the poorer one outdoes the other on IQ measures, by the age of 4 the middle-class child will have caught up and by 10 he will be cleverer than his poorer counterpart. In other words, even naturally clever children are dragged down by their situations. Does this not make you angry? How is it not grossly unfair?
No, it doesn't. I think it's a shame, but I blame the parents to be honest. Middle class families don't have smarter children, they raise smarter children. They spend time with them, take them out to places, buy them educationally stimulating toys, instead of sticking them in front of the TV.

I'm not saying it's impossible to defy a very poor upbringing, but it is extremely difficult. As far as "everyone has the chance to work hard and earn money"... :rolleyes: shall we have a discussion on the literature of meritocracy? Does a meritocracy really exist, Ali? Do you really know anything about social mobility?
Yeah, okay, lets discuss this also. As I've said, I'm aware you've studied it in more depth than I have. But yes, I believe it does. We live in a relatively free market, everyone has chances, some don't take it.




Their financial situation = being uneducated. You are such a moron, it hurts.
Being poor is no excuse, to be honest. As I've said, there's plenty you can do that doesn't require a lot of money.

I think we're hijacking the thread lol...
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 1910
.Ali.


I think we're hijacking the thread lol...



Somehow, I think that was always your intention.:wink:
Reply 1911
emilY?
Somehow, I think that was always your intention.:wink:


Haha not really, I just find it annoying when people bitch about "rahs" tbh, I mean, they're not hurting anyone so what's the problem?
.Ali.
Lol chavs don't > rahs. Chavs are vile and disgusting, they're a plague on society. Bloody antisocial, uneducated pricks.

Why does wearing Jack Wills make someone pretentious? I wear Jack Wills. Also, at least so called 'Jack Wills wearing cliquey types' are cultured. Myself and my friends would much rather go out for a meal or to the theatre, than smash a bus-shelter because it makes us look "well 'ard bruv" or whatever tosh they say.

Blatant jealousy.

wearing jack wills doesn't equal cultured; it makes you homogenous clones. it's not jealousy to want something other than branded, expensive crap to define me as an individual.
Reply 1913
Acerbic
wearing jack wills doesn't equal cultured; it makes you homogenous clones. it's not jealousy to want something other than branded, expensive crap to define me as an individual.


Actually, I suggested two options there that had nothing to do with Jack Wills, that make people cultured. It's not all branded lol, you can get plenty of Jack Wills that doesn't have the name on it. And we don't look like clones, we don't all wear exactly the same items lol.
.Ali.
Actually, I suggested two options there that had nothing to do with Jack Wills, that make people cultured. It's not all branded lol, you can get plenty of Jack Wills that doesn't have the name on it. And we don't look like clones, we don't all wear exactly the same items lol.

two options which, to do with regularity, you need quite a bit of dosh. on the subject of jack wills - you're not telling me that the price is due to the quality of production, rather than the name on the label, are you? and yes, you do look pretty much the same.
Reply 1915
.Ali.
Why does wearing Jack Wills make someone pretentious? I wear Jack Wills.


QED :wink:

(That's 'quod erat demonstrandum', for those who didn't have the benefit of a classical education. Latin, innit.)
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 1916
Honeyclown
You have a gigantic complex. Why in every thread are you so desperate to point out you think you are a rah as though it's the most important thing in the world? No one gives a ****. There are other things that define a person (although maybe you don't have anything else so that's why your obsessed with this) so just change the record. Thanks!


I haven't said I'm a rah, I've said stop having a go at rahs.
Reply 1917
Acerbic
two options which, to do with regularity, you need quite a bit of dosh. on the subject of jack wills - you're not telling me that the price is due to the quality of production, rather than the name on the label, are you? and yes, you do look pretty much the same.


They don't have to that be expensive.

And yes, I am. I know because I wear it, not because of some marketing scam before you start. And we don't but oh well, we look nice, so y'know.
Reply 1918
Jez RR
QED :wink:

(That's 'quod erat demonstrandum', for those who didn't have the benefit of a classical education. Latin, innit.)


Oh, brilliant. How witty! I'm not pretentious lol.
Reply 1919
Honeyclown
Haha alright, replace rah with 'someone who wears jack wills and thinks they're posh'. My point still stands. I think you need to get off TSR tbh.


I don't think I'm posh lol, I think I'm normal. No I'm not getting off TSR, just becaus it's filled with inverted snobs who can't hide their jealousy.

Quick Reply

Latest