# Determining Statement Truth or Falsity

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

Hello, I came across this question and I'm a bit confused when it comes to the answer.

My attempt was to solve this simultaneously.I found out that they cross at

But what does this mean in terms of determining the truth/falsity?

Thank you

**∀x∃y(x+y=2 ∧ 2x−y=1)**My attempt was to solve this simultaneously.I found out that they cross at

**(1/2, 3/2)**But what does this mean in terms of determining the truth/falsity?

Thank you

0

reply

Report

#2

(Original post by

Hello, I came across this question and I'm a bit confused when it comes to the answer.

My attempt was to solve this simultaneously.I found out that they cross at

But what does this mean in terms of determining the truth/falsity?

Thank you

**mathboy3495**)Hello, I came across this question and I'm a bit confused when it comes to the answer.

**∀x∃y(x+y=2 ∧ 2x−y=1)**My attempt was to solve this simultaneously.I found out that they cross at

**(1/2, 3/2)**But what does this mean in terms of determining the truth/falsity?

Thank you

As regards to whether it's true of not, what does the statement mean if you said it in english?

0

reply

Report

#3

**mathboy3495**)

Hello, I came across this question and I'm a bit confused when it comes to the answer.

**∀x∃y(x+y=2 ∧ 2x−y=1)**

My attempt was to solve this simultaneously.I found out that they cross at

**(1/2, 3/2)**

But what does this mean in terms of determining the truth/falsity?

Thank you

0

reply

(Original post by

You've made an error somewhere as that point doesn't satisfy both equations.

As regards to whether it's true of not, what does the statement mean if you said it in english?

**ghostwalker**)You've made an error somewhere as that point doesn't satisfy both equations.

As regards to whether it's true of not, what does the statement mean if you said it in english?

The question is saying that for every x, I can find some y that satisfies both equations?

0

reply

(Original post by

You have the equations of two lines. What does there being a solution for all x require?

**RogerOxon**)You have the equations of two lines. What does there being a solution for all x require?

0

reply

Report

#6

(Original post by

Ah yes, i got (1,1) now

The question is saying that for every x, I can find some y that satisfies both equations?

**mathboy3495**)Ah yes, i got (1,1) now

The question is saying that for every x, I can find some y that satisfies both equations?

So, is it true. For each x is there a y such that those two equations are true? If you're unsure, check a few cases, is it true for x=0 say?

0

reply

(Original post by

Yep.

So, is it true. For each x is there a y such that those two equations are true? If you're unsure, check a few cases, is it true for x=0 say?

**ghostwalker**)Yep.

So, is it true. For each x is there a y such that those two equations are true? If you're unsure, check a few cases, is it true for x=0 say?

0

reply

Report

#8

(Original post by

False for x=0 as it gives different y values. So is the only method to find that the statement is true/false is to test certain x values?

**mathboy3495**)False for x=0 as it gives different y values. So is the only method to find that the statement is true/false is to test certain x values?

In this case since the two equations have a unique solution then they are only satisfied by one value of x. So, the statement cannot be true for all x.

Bare in mind that to show something is true for all whatever, you need to check all cases - this isn't usually as bad as it seems as you can often use a general agrument. To show it's false you only need to fine one counter-example.

0

reply

(Original post by

No, there are other methods depending on the context.

In this case since the two equations have a unique solution then they are only satisfied by one value of x. So, the statement cannot be true for all x.

Bare in mind that to show something is true for all whatever, you need to check all cases - this isn't usually as bad as it seems as you can often use a general agrument. To show it's false you only need to fine one counter-example.

**ghostwalker**)No, there are other methods depending on the context.

In this case since the two equations have a unique solution then they are only satisfied by one value of x. So, the statement cannot be true for all x.

Bare in mind that to show something is true for all whatever, you need to check all cases - this isn't usually as bad as it seems as you can often use a general agrument. To show it's false you only need to fine one counter-example.

0

reply

Report

#10

At the point of intersection of the two straight lines x + y = 2 and 2x - y = 1 there is only one x value ( 1) and one y value (1) which satisfies both equations. If you and a friend are travelling along the lines towards their intersection there is only one point where you both occupy the same position at the same time (simultaneously). This is why we call these equations a pair of simultaneous equations.

Can you think of a case where the two lines don’t cross i.e where there is no solution to the simultaneous equations?

Can you think of a case where the two lines don’t cross i.e where there is no solution to the simultaneous equations?

0

reply

(Original post by

At the point of intersection of the two straight lines x + y = 2 and 2x - y = 1 there is only one x value ( 1) and one y value (1) which satisfies both equations. If you and a friend are travelling along the lines towards their intersection there is only one point where you both occupy the same position at the same time (simultaneously). This is why we call these equations a pair of simultaneous equations.

Can you think of a case where the two lines don’t cross i.e where there is no solution to the simultaneous equations?

**hoosie**)At the point of intersection of the two straight lines x + y = 2 and 2x - y = 1 there is only one x value ( 1) and one y value (1) which satisfies both equations. If you and a friend are travelling along the lines towards their intersection there is only one point where you both occupy the same position at the same time (simultaneously). This is why we call these equations a pair of simultaneous equations.

Can you think of a case where the two lines don’t cross i.e where there is no solution to the simultaneous equations?

0

reply

Report

#12

At the point of intersection of the two straight lines x + y = 2 and 2x - y = 1 there is only one x value ( 1) and one y value (1) which satisfies both equations. If you and a friend are travelling along the lines towards their intersection there is only one point where you both occupy the same position at the same time (simultaneously). This is why we call these equations a pair of simultaneous equations.

Can you think of a case where the two lines don’t cross i.e where there is no solution to the simultaneous equations?

Can you think of a case where the two lines don’t cross i.e where there is no solution to the simultaneous equations?

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top