# Matrix question

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

'The rotation represented by the 2 X 2 matrix B is such that B^3=I and B=/=I

Write down a possible matrix B and describe the transformation fully.'

Could anyone help explain how to do this? The previous question asked for when A^2=I and I answered that fine, but I cant seem to use the same method for this one.

'I' is the identity matrix, just to clarify.

Write down a possible matrix B and describe the transformation fully.'

Could anyone help explain how to do this? The previous question asked for when A^2=I and I answered that fine, but I cant seem to use the same method for this one.

'I' is the identity matrix, just to clarify.

0

reply

Report

#2

So start by building the foundations:

lets call Matrx B = [a b, c d]

B^3 = I = [a b, c d] . [a b, c d] . [a b, c d] = [1 0, 0 1]

hence we can generate expressions for a b c d. We also know: [a b, c d] =/= [1 0, 0 1]

this should get you started...

lets call Matrx B = [a b, c d]

B^3 = I = [a b, c d] . [a b, c d] . [a b, c d] = [1 0, 0 1]

hence we can generate expressions for a b c d. We also know: [a b, c d] =/= [1 0, 0 1]

this should get you started...

0

reply

(Original post by

So start by building the foundations:

lets call Matrx B = [a b, c d]

B^3 = I = [a b, c d] . [a b, c d] . [a b, c d] = [1 0, 0 1]

hence we can generate expressions for a b c d. We also know: [a b, c d] =/= [1 0, 0 1]

this should get you started...

**mnot**)So start by building the foundations:

lets call Matrx B = [a b, c d]

B^3 = I = [a b, c d] . [a b, c d] . [a b, c d] = [1 0, 0 1]

hence we can generate expressions for a b c d. We also know: [a b, c d] =/= [1 0, 0 1]

this should get you started...

0

reply

Report

#4

(Original post by

'The rotation represented by the 2 X 2 matrix B is such that B^3=I and B=/=I

Write down a possible matrix B and describe the transformation fully.'

Could anyone help explain how to do this? The previous question asked for when A^2=I and I answered that fine, but I cant seem to use the same method for this one.

'I' is the identity matrix, just to clarify.

**parisnaomi**)'The rotation represented by the 2 X 2 matrix B is such that B^3=I and B=/=I

Write down a possible matrix B and describe the transformation fully.'

Could anyone help explain how to do this? The previous question asked for when A^2=I and I answered that fine, but I cant seem to use the same method for this one.

'I' is the identity matrix, just to clarify.

The fact that this is I means if you rotate 3 times about the origin you end up where you started...

So how much is each rotation by?? Construct its matrix!

2

reply

(Original post by

B is a rotation about the origin by some angle, and if you apply it 3 times then thats the same as rotating 3 times.

The fact that this is I means if you rotate 3 times about the origin you end up where you started...

So how much is each rotation by?? Construct its matrix!

**RDKGames**)B is a rotation about the origin by some angle, and if you apply it 3 times then thats the same as rotating 3 times.

The fact that this is I means if you rotate 3 times about the origin you end up where you started...

So how much is each rotation by?? Construct its matrix!

0

reply

Report

#6

(Original post by

ahhhh ok! this makes so much sense. i was honestly thinking of something like this but couldn't quite grasp the right idea. and now im kicking myself for not realising it myself hahaha. thank you

**parisnaomi**)ahhhh ok! this makes so much sense. i was honestly thinking of something like this but couldn't quite grasp the right idea. and now im kicking myself for not realising it myself hahaha. thank you

You can rewrite this as (where 0 is now not a regular scalar 0 but just a 2x2 matrix of zeroes) and factorise the LHS just as you would normally;

One solution is of course but we are explicitly told that in the question, which is always good to refer back to.

So we have that .

If you pretend B isn't a matrix, and just a scalar , and similarly is just , then you would solve as .

This is where knowledge of complex numbers is applicable, because we can treat our normal 2D plane simply as an Argand diagram. Notice how multiplying by corresponds to a rotation about the origin in the Argand diagram, it precisely means anticlockwise by angle .

So, based on the previous part, you could claim (and even verify) that

It is not immediatly clear what this means but this complex number can be rewritten as

hence we have that

or if we rewrite it in matrix form;

As mentioned previously, corresponds to rotating about the origin by pi/2 radians anticlockwise. Applying it to the identity matrix means we simply rotate the unit vectors and by this description to obtain and , respectively.

Hence in this sense.

So, we just finish up and note that

which is precisely the matrix for as required, and clearly B is a rotation by pi/3 radians.

The and signs only indicate the direction in which we are rotating, so technically there are two possible answers for (notice that is a quadratic so by Fundamental Theorem of Algebra it has at exactly 2 roots)

We can either rotate 2pi/3 anticlockwise, or clockwise. This is why the question is phrased in the way 'write down a possible matrix B' implying there are more than one but they are all equally as valid.

Anyway, I do not suggest you take this approach for this question. I merely mention it because it's interesting to see a link between the complex plane and 2D transformations, and treating a matrix equation as a regular polynomial is helpful at times because you can still use factorisation just as you would normally.

For instance, you can use this if you wish to determine two possible matrices such that .

This approach comes with a caveat in that you should be careful when there is more than one matrix in an equation, simply due to the fact that matrices most of the time do not commute; ie .

Last edited by RDKGames; 1 month ago

1

reply

Report

#7

(Original post by

Another, but less common approach, is to treat like a cubic equation for you to solve.

You can rewrite this as (where 0 is now not a regular scalar 0 but just a 2x2 matrix of zeroes) and factorise the LHS just as you would normally;

One solution is of course but we are explicitly told that in the question, which is always good to refer back to.

So we have that .

If you pretend B isn't a matrix, and just a scalar , and similarly is just , then you would solve as .

This is where knowledge of complex numbers is applicable, because we can treat our normal 2D plane simply as an Argand diagram. Notice how multiplying by corresponds to a rotation about the origin in the Argand diagram, it precisely means anticlockwise by angle .

So, based on the previous part, you could claim (and even verify) that

It is not immediatly clear what this means but this complex number can be rewritten as

hence we have that

or if we rewrite it in matrix form;

As mentioned previously, corresponds to rotating about the origin by pi/2 radians anticlockwise. Applying it to the identity matrix means we simply rotate the unit vectors and by this description to obtain and , respectively.

Hence in this sense.

So, we just finish up and note that

which is precisely the matrix for as required, and clearly B is a rotation by pi/3 radians.

The and signs only indicate the direction in which we are rotating, so technically there are two possible answers for (notice that is a quadratic so by Fundamental Theorem of Algebra it has at exactly 2 roots)

We can either rotate pi/3 anticlockwise, or clockwise. This is why the question is phrases in the way 'write down a possible matrix B' implying there are more than one but they are all equally as valid.

Anyway, I do not suggest you take this approach for this question. I merely mention it because it's interesting to see a link between the complex plane and 2D transformations, and treating a matrix equation as a regular polynomial is helpful at times because you can still use factorisation just as you would normally.

For instance, you can use this if you wish to determine two possible matrices such that .

This approach comes with a caveat in that you should be careful when there is more than one matrix in an equation, simply due to the fact that matrices most of the time do not commute; ie .

**RDKGames**)Another, but less common approach, is to treat like a cubic equation for you to solve.

You can rewrite this as (where 0 is now not a regular scalar 0 but just a 2x2 matrix of zeroes) and factorise the LHS just as you would normally;

One solution is of course but we are explicitly told that in the question, which is always good to refer back to.

So we have that .

If you pretend B isn't a matrix, and just a scalar , and similarly is just , then you would solve as .

This is where knowledge of complex numbers is applicable, because we can treat our normal 2D plane simply as an Argand diagram. Notice how multiplying by corresponds to a rotation about the origin in the Argand diagram, it precisely means anticlockwise by angle .

So, based on the previous part, you could claim (and even verify) that

It is not immediatly clear what this means but this complex number can be rewritten as

hence we have that

or if we rewrite it in matrix form;

As mentioned previously, corresponds to rotating about the origin by pi/2 radians anticlockwise. Applying it to the identity matrix means we simply rotate the unit vectors and by this description to obtain and , respectively.

Hence in this sense.

So, we just finish up and note that

which is precisely the matrix for as required, and clearly B is a rotation by pi/3 radians.

The and signs only indicate the direction in which we are rotating, so technically there are two possible answers for (notice that is a quadratic so by Fundamental Theorem of Algebra it has at exactly 2 roots)

We can either rotate pi/3 anticlockwise, or clockwise. This is why the question is phrases in the way 'write down a possible matrix B' implying there are more than one but they are all equally as valid.

Anyway, I do not suggest you take this approach for this question. I merely mention it because it's interesting to see a link between the complex plane and 2D transformations, and treating a matrix equation as a regular polynomial is helpful at times because you can still use factorisation just as you would normally.

For instance, you can use this if you wish to determine two possible matrices such that .

This approach comes with a caveat in that you should be careful when there is more than one matrix in an equation, simply due to the fact that matrices most of the time do not commute; ie .

I love reading these posts its is nice to see different ways people approach problems like this and 'elegantly worked' solutions. I dont really ever do line by line mathematics anymore but its great to see.

But i see this a lot on TSR, people keep writing i instead of j (why cant everyone adopt the imo superior notation).

1

reply

Report

#8

(Original post by

nicely done.

I love reading these posts its is nice to see different ways people approach problems like this and 'elegantly worked' solutions. I dont really ever do line by line mathematics anymore but its great to see.

But i see this a lot on TSR, people keep writing i instead of j (why cant everyone adopt the imo superior notation).

**mnot**)nicely done.

I love reading these posts its is nice to see different ways people approach problems like this and 'elegantly worked' solutions. I dont really ever do line by line mathematics anymore but its great to see.

But i see this a lot on TSR, people keep writing i instead of j (why cant everyone adopt the imo superior notation).

1

reply

(Original post by

Another, but less common approach, is to treat like a cubic equation for you to solve.

You can rewrite this as (where 0 is now not a regular scalar 0 but just a 2x2 matrix of zeroes) and factorise the LHS just as you would normally;

One solution is of course but we are explicitly told that in the question, which is always good to refer back to.

So we have that .

If you pretend B isn't a matrix, and just a scalar , and similarly is just , then you would solve as .

This is where knowledge of complex numbers is applicable, because we can treat our normal 2D plane simply as an Argand diagram. Notice how multiplying by corresponds to a rotation about the origin in the Argand diagram, it precisely means anticlockwise by angle .

So, based on the previous part, you could claim (and even verify) that

It is not immediatly clear what this means but this complex number can be rewritten as

hence we have that

or if we rewrite it in matrix form;

As mentioned previously, corresponds to rotating about the origin by pi/2 radians anticlockwise. Applying it to the identity matrix means we simply rotate the unit vectors and by this description to obtain and , respectively.

Hence in this sense.

So, we just finish up and note that

which is precisely the matrix for as required, and clearly B is a rotation by pi/3 radians.

The and signs only indicate the direction in which we are rotating, so technically there are two possible answers for (notice that is a quadratic so by Fundamental Theorem of Algebra it has at exactly 2 roots)

We can either rotate pi/3 anticlockwise, or clockwise. This is why the question is phrased in the way 'write down a possible matrix B' implying there are more than one but they are all equally as valid.

Anyway, I do not suggest you take this approach for this question. I merely mention it because it's interesting to see a link between the complex plane and 2D transformations, and treating a matrix equation as a regular polynomial is helpful at times because you can still use factorisation just as you would normally.

For instance, you can use this if you wish to determine two possible matrices such that .

This approach comes with a caveat in that you should be careful when there is more than one matrix in an equation, simply due to the fact that matrices most of the time do not commute; ie .

**RDKGames**)Another, but less common approach, is to treat like a cubic equation for you to solve.

You can rewrite this as (where 0 is now not a regular scalar 0 but just a 2x2 matrix of zeroes) and factorise the LHS just as you would normally;

One solution is of course but we are explicitly told that in the question, which is always good to refer back to.

So we have that .

If you pretend B isn't a matrix, and just a scalar , and similarly is just , then you would solve as .

This is where knowledge of complex numbers is applicable, because we can treat our normal 2D plane simply as an Argand diagram. Notice how multiplying by corresponds to a rotation about the origin in the Argand diagram, it precisely means anticlockwise by angle .

So, based on the previous part, you could claim (and even verify) that

It is not immediatly clear what this means but this complex number can be rewritten as

hence we have that

or if we rewrite it in matrix form;

As mentioned previously, corresponds to rotating about the origin by pi/2 radians anticlockwise. Applying it to the identity matrix means we simply rotate the unit vectors and by this description to obtain and , respectively.

Hence in this sense.

So, we just finish up and note that

which is precisely the matrix for as required, and clearly B is a rotation by pi/3 radians.

The and signs only indicate the direction in which we are rotating, so technically there are two possible answers for (notice that is a quadratic so by Fundamental Theorem of Algebra it has at exactly 2 roots)

We can either rotate pi/3 anticlockwise, or clockwise. This is why the question is phrased in the way 'write down a possible matrix B' implying there are more than one but they are all equally as valid.

Anyway, I do not suggest you take this approach for this question. I merely mention it because it's interesting to see a link between the complex plane and 2D transformations, and treating a matrix equation as a regular polynomial is helpful at times because you can still use factorisation just as you would normally.

For instance, you can use this if you wish to determine two possible matrices such that .

This approach comes with a caveat in that you should be careful when there is more than one matrix in an equation, simply due to the fact that matrices most of the time do not commute; ie .

1

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top