This discussion is now closed.
Check out other Related discussions
- Is there someone for everyone in this world
- How to tell if a guy is just using you
- Bf told me he only slept and took my virginity from me as a bet
- Opinion from the ladies
- Down With Love (2003) - better than Barbie!!!
- I'm 19 and i have urge to lose my virginity. What advice can you give me as a male
- An Inspector Calls
- Chadfish
- Feeling insecure
- My boyfriend makes me feel like I’m not good enough and keeps pointing out my flaws
- Are women fully protected by the Law?
- do women assume men don't care about feeling loved?
- Why is height such a deal breaker for girls?
- FIFA Women's World Cup 2023
- is it normal to think women are attractive as a woman and be straight
- I don't like communicating with men
- JK Rowling in ‘arrest me’ challenge over hate crime law
- What feminine clothing itens wkll become commonplace for men to wear in the future?
- Single men ought to be taught about the reality of being men at a young age
- My Crush is Perfect except for this one thing.
Do men deserve women?
Let's break this down.
Most women are physically attractive than most men.
Hence they're already ahead a point.
So, it boils down to whether he is interesting, right?
No. Just merely being interesting doesn't warrant he deserves her either, because chances are she is going to have interesting elements about her personality too, so she's still leading overall.
He'll only match her level with high affluence to bring to the table, and that's still assuming she isn't enough wealthy herself to cancel his point.
And since the majority of men aren't affluent, the greater part of them gets disqualified there.
Thus, we can safely deduce that most men don't deserve the romantic company of most women.
Yet, when we look around, we see that almost every man ends up being in a relationship at one point.
It is only due to the unbound compassion of women and striking luck of unavailability of a worthier counterpart that most of us get to see a woman's graceful bare body at all.
Most women are physically attractive than most men.
Hence they're already ahead a point.
So, it boils down to whether he is interesting, right?
No. Just merely being interesting doesn't warrant he deserves her either, because chances are she is going to have interesting elements about her personality too, so she's still leading overall.
He'll only match her level with high affluence to bring to the table, and that's still assuming she isn't enough wealthy herself to cancel his point.
And since the majority of men aren't affluent, the greater part of them gets disqualified there.
Thus, we can safely deduce that most men don't deserve the romantic company of most women.
Yet, when we look around, we see that almost every man ends up being in a relationship at one point.
It is only due to the unbound compassion of women and striking luck of unavailability of a worthier counterpart that most of us get to see a woman's graceful bare body at all.
(edited 4 years ago)
Scroll to see replies
Do women deserve men?
There are loads of handsome and beautiful men alike
A man will try as much as he can to match up to the rainbow emotions women throw at them
A man will try to be strong just so he avoids comparison
Lots of guys are burdened with the need to be wealthy almost always just for a woman
How many women choose men that aren’t affluent?
There are loads of handsome and beautiful men alike
A man will try as much as he can to match up to the rainbow emotions women throw at them
A man will try to be strong just so he avoids comparison
Lots of guys are burdened with the need to be wealthy almost always just for a woman
How many women choose men that aren’t affluent?
No men, definitely dont deserve us women lol.
Are you stupid?
"Most women are physically attractive than most men."
That's not true. Most heterosexual women find men more physically sexually attractive than women.
Just as most heterosexual men find women more physically sexually attractive than men.
Therefore the whole of your original post is based on a completely false premise.
And besides it's one of those things that it's not worth analysing.
If a woman wants a boyfriend, she needs a man to be her boyfriend.
And vice versa.
It's not some competition as to who deserves whom more.
It's not some competition as to who has the higher moral ground.
And men and women are more similar than they are different. And both men and women - in general - are equally valid human beings. Neither is significantly "better" than the other. The differences that exist are no big deal in the grand scheme of things in this mechanised modern world.
And anyone pushing an agenda that either men or women are superior is being sexist. Extremes of which are quite rightly illegal in the UK.
That's not true. Most heterosexual women find men more physically sexually attractive than women.
Just as most heterosexual men find women more physically sexually attractive than men.
Therefore the whole of your original post is based on a completely false premise.
And besides it's one of those things that it's not worth analysing.
If a woman wants a boyfriend, she needs a man to be her boyfriend.
And vice versa.
It's not some competition as to who deserves whom more.
It's not some competition as to who has the higher moral ground.
And men and women are more similar than they are different. And both men and women - in general - are equally valid human beings. Neither is significantly "better" than the other. The differences that exist are no big deal in the grand scheme of things in this mechanised modern world.
And anyone pushing an agenda that either men or women are superior is being sexist. Extremes of which are quite rightly illegal in the UK.
Original post by Dunnig Kruger
"Most women are physically attractive than most men."
That's not true. Most heterosexual women find men more physically sexually attractive than women.
Just as most heterosexual men find women more physically sexually attractive than men.
Therefore the whole of your original post is based on a completely false premise.
And besides it's one of those things that it's not worth analysing.
If a woman wants a boyfriend, she needs a man to be her boyfriend.
And vice versa.
It's not some competition as to who deserves whom more.
It's not some competition as to who has the higher moral ground.
And men and women are more similar than they are different. And both men and women - in general - are equally valid human beings. Neither is significantly "better" than the other. The differences that exist are no big deal in the grand scheme of things in this mechanised modern world.
And anyone pushing an agenda that either men or women are superior is being sexist. Extremes of which are quite rightly illegal in the UK.
That's not true. Most heterosexual women find men more physically sexually attractive than women.
Just as most heterosexual men find women more physically sexually attractive than men.
Therefore the whole of your original post is based on a completely false premise.
And besides it's one of those things that it's not worth analysing.
If a woman wants a boyfriend, she needs a man to be her boyfriend.
And vice versa.
It's not some competition as to who deserves whom more.
It's not some competition as to who has the higher moral ground.
And men and women are more similar than they are different. And both men and women - in general - are equally valid human beings. Neither is significantly "better" than the other. The differences that exist are no big deal in the grand scheme of things in this mechanised modern world.
And anyone pushing an agenda that either men or women are superior is being sexist. Extremes of which are quite rightly illegal in the UK.
Most heterosexual women find men more physically sexually attractive than women.
The keyword here is 'sexually'.
She might not be sexually attracted to other women, but all women in unison are aware of the fact that physical beauty-wise men are far below.
Are you trying to insinuate that women are superior to men? 
'Cause it sure sounds like it.
'Cause it sure sounds like it.
Original post by LoriBell
Most heterosexual women find men more physically sexually attractive than women.
The keyword here is 'sexually'.
She might not be sexually attracted to other women, but all women in unison are aware of the fact that physical beauty-wise men are far below.
The keyword here is 'sexually'.
She might not be sexually attracted to other women, but all women in unison are aware of the fact that physical beauty-wise men are far below.
That's debatable.
But so what if it is true?
It's totally unimportant.
Because it's sexual attraction that counts. Not how pleasing on the eye someone is to look at if you mounted them above the mantelpiece as a trophy.
Begone thot
Original post by Arthur_Morgan
Begone thot
I'm a guy
Original post by LoriBell
I'm a guy
You're a loon.
Original post by LoriBell
but all women in unison are aware of the fact that physical beauty-wise men are far below.
Is that because of the higher rate of obesity in women?
Original post by LoriBell
Let's break this down.
Most women are physically attractive than most men.
Hence they're already ahead a point.
So, it boils down to whether he is interesting, right?
No. Just merely being interesting doesn't warrant he deserves her either, because chances are she is going to have interesting elements about her personality too, so she's still leading overall.
He'll only match her level with high affluence to bring to the table, and that's still assuming she isn't enough wealthy herself to cancel his point.
And since the majority of men aren't affluent, the greater part of them gets disqualified there.
Thus, we can safely deduce that most men don't deserve the romantic company of most women.
Yet, when we look around, we see that almost every man ends up being in a relationship at one point.
It is only due to the unbound compassion of women and striking luck of unavailability of a worthier counterpart that most of us get to see a woman's graceful bare body at all.
Most women are physically attractive than most men.
Hence they're already ahead a point.
So, it boils down to whether he is interesting, right?
No. Just merely being interesting doesn't warrant he deserves her either, because chances are she is going to have interesting elements about her personality too, so she's still leading overall.
He'll only match her level with high affluence to bring to the table, and that's still assuming she isn't enough wealthy herself to cancel his point.
And since the majority of men aren't affluent, the greater part of them gets disqualified there.
Thus, we can safely deduce that most men don't deserve the romantic company of most women.
Yet, when we look around, we see that almost every man ends up being in a relationship at one point.
It is only due to the unbound compassion of women and striking luck of unavailability of a worthier counterpart that most of us get to see a woman's graceful bare body at all.
A convo you could gracefully have with your mum and dad tbf
(edited 4 years ago)
Look,
I don’t like to be mean or rude , but honesty isn’t either of those
You seem very sexist .
That’s unhealthy, see I am not trying to hurt you by saying that ,but this mindset is so old fashioned and honestly unappealing . If you want to know the answer ? Just don’t bother thinking like that, and assume all those stuff...Meaning it doesn’t matter if the women or the man is more attractive, love is when two people understand each other, work through the hardest parts of relationships together, support each other , and attract each other not just physically but personality too. You are only looking at one side , and you really don’t care if men are good or not .as I can tell, your focus is only on women ...
In short : yes they do . Each person deserves the one who matches with them , of course , but generalizing all men is not wise .
Hope this helps .
I don’t like to be mean or rude , but honesty isn’t either of those
You seem very sexist .
That’s unhealthy, see I am not trying to hurt you by saying that ,but this mindset is so old fashioned and honestly unappealing . If you want to know the answer ? Just don’t bother thinking like that, and assume all those stuff...Meaning it doesn’t matter if the women or the man is more attractive, love is when two people understand each other, work through the hardest parts of relationships together, support each other , and attract each other not just physically but personality too. You are only looking at one side , and you really don’t care if men are good or not .as I can tell, your focus is only on women ...
In short : yes they do . Each person deserves the one who matches with them , of course , but generalizing all men is not wise .
Hope this helps .
Original post by LoriBell
I'm a guy
Begone thot
Original post by LoriBell
I'm a guy
You can still be a thot.
Original post by LoriBell
Let's break this down.
Most women are physically attractive than most men.
Most women are physically attractive than most men.
No they're not. There's nothing about women that makes them inherently more attractive than men. If you're a straight male then you find them more attractive for that reason. Straight women will find men more attractive than women. Based purely on statistics there will be a fairly equal number of beautiful women and handsome men.
Hence they're already ahead a point.
You're basing someone's worth and value on their looks? How vile.
So, it boils down to whether he is interesting, right?
No. Just merely being interesting doesn't warrant he deserves her either, because chances are she is going to have interesting elements about her personality too, so she's still leading overall.
He'll only match her level with high affluence to bring to the table, and that's still assuming she isn't enough wealthy herself to cancel his point.
And since the majority of men aren't affluent, the greater part of them gets disqualified there.
Thus, we can safely deduce that most men don't deserve the romantic company of most women.
Yet, when we look around, we see that almost every man ends up being in a relationship at one point.
It is only due to the unbound compassion of women and striking luck of unavailability of a worthier counterpart that most of us get to see a woman's graceful bare body at all.
No. Just merely being interesting doesn't warrant he deserves her either, because chances are she is going to have interesting elements about her personality too, so she's still leading overall.
He'll only match her level with high affluence to bring to the table, and that's still assuming she isn't enough wealthy herself to cancel his point.
And since the majority of men aren't affluent, the greater part of them gets disqualified there.
Thus, we can safely deduce that most men don't deserve the romantic company of most women.
Yet, when we look around, we see that almost every man ends up being in a relationship at one point.
It is only due to the unbound compassion of women and striking luck of unavailability of a worthier counterpart that most of us get to see a woman's graceful bare body at all.
Troll
(edited 4 years ago)
Related discussions
- Is there someone for everyone in this world
- How to tell if a guy is just using you
- Bf told me he only slept and took my virginity from me as a bet
- Opinion from the ladies
- Down With Love (2003) - better than Barbie!!!
- I'm 19 and i have urge to lose my virginity. What advice can you give me as a male
- An Inspector Calls
- Chadfish
- Feeling insecure
- My boyfriend makes me feel like I’m not good enough and keeps pointing out my flaws
- Are women fully protected by the Law?
- do women assume men don't care about feeling loved?
- Why is height such a deal breaker for girls?
- FIFA Women's World Cup 2023
- is it normal to think women are attractive as a woman and be straight
- I don't like communicating with men
- JK Rowling in ‘arrest me’ challenge over hate crime law
- What feminine clothing itens wkll become commonplace for men to wear in the future?
- Single men ought to be taught about the reality of being men at a young age
- My Crush is Perfect except for this one thing.
Latest
Last reply 1 minute ago
Medical doctor degree apprenticeship 2024Last reply 3 minutes ago
Official: University of Bristol A100 2024 Entry ApplicantsLast reply 3 minutes ago
Official University of Portsmouth Offer Holders Thread for 2024 entryLast reply 5 minutes ago
BTEC Business Unit 5 International BusinessLast reply 8 minutes ago
Student finance for Pre-Settlement Status applicant for BSc NursingLast reply 8 minutes ago
Official University of St Andrews Applicant Thread for 2024Last reply 9 minutes ago
I tried to apply to Disabled Student’s Allowance but…Last reply 11 minutes ago
Michaela School: Muslim student loses prayer ban challengeLast reply 14 minutes ago
BAE systems degree apprenticeships September 2024Last reply 14 minutes ago
Joint Maths And Economics - Enough maths for quant work/masters?Trending
Last reply 8 hours ago
My friend might be getting extra time and i hate it.Last reply 1 week ago
Just found out about UCL stat test but can't afford to sit itLast reply 1 week ago
Dad keeps criticising my university degree choiceTrending
Last reply 8 hours ago
My friend might be getting extra time and i hate it.Last reply 1 week ago
Just found out about UCL stat test but can't afford to sit itLast reply 1 week ago
Dad keeps criticising my university degree choice
