Chinese state continues pushing conspiracy blaming US for coronavirus

They are not camps to be used for traditional genocide rather cultural genocide. The Chinese hate anyone that has ideas different to their dictator.

Elaborate on that. What are those 'ideas'?

Islam and Christianity. It is classic Sinicization.

That comes directly from Xi.

The chinese 'concentration camps' have already been proven to be a myth spread by the CIA. The re-education centres did exist, but the conditions inside them were grossly exaggerated. I am willing to provide sources if you ask for them.

I am not saying that the CIA did it, but I do believe that the possibility is not off the table as this does not seem like something that they wouldn't do, given their past activities. I would also sooner believe the virus to be CIA's fault, rather than China's. Nevertheless, I think that the most likely scenario is that the virus appeared naturally, neither due to the CIA's nor the CCP's activities.

Sorry, but I do not understand your second paragraph.

The article mentions that according to Xi Jinping, the objective of such sinicization is to "guide the adaptation of religions to socialist society". Nothing there suggests that they hate religion and want to eradicate it (in fact, they wish to strengthen "the education of religious figures" and give "full play to patriotic religious groups"); they just intend to alter it so that it fits in their society (which is probably the reason why religions appeared in the first place anyway).

Their actions seems completely reasonable as steps taken to avoid religious extremism.

The article mentions that according to Xi Jinping, the objective of such sinicization is to "guide the adaptation of religions to socialist society". Nothing there suggests that they hate religion and want to eradicate it (in fact, they wish to strengthen "the education of religious figures" and give "full play to patriotic religious groups"); they just intend to alter it so that it fits in their society (which is probably the reason why religions appeared in the first place anyway).

Their actions seems completely reasonable as steps taken to avoid religious extremism.

Except if you were going to profit, then you would already have bought the company and it pales into insignificance compared to the amount of damage done to the US economy, so complete nonsense.

Actually, the German government stopped the US from buying the company (this was confirmed by the German government themselves). Trump is trying to say he found the vaccine and then charge a huge amount to all the other 100+ other countries who have coronavirus. Remember he has an election coming up.

Your claim is ridiculous which shows you dont have an understanding of the economic impact of cv19. It will only be a matter of time before many other countries develop their own vaccine.
No he hasnt found the vaccine, link your source.
No he isnt charging anyone anything.
If anything cv 19 has been a disaster for him so far.

Yes i would like to see them, but ill tell you this now if any of them are Chinese businesses they are by default invalid. All companies in china are subjects of the CCP and cannot operate if they say anything other than party propaganda.

It is off the table and it doesn't seem like something they woul do because even if you hate the CIA you have to admit they work in the interest of the US; and crashing the US economy does not benefit the US.

My last paragraph explains that If the CIA did this the US(and probably a lot of their alies) would have closed its borders to all foreign travellers in January like Russia did, and just like russia they would have barely any cases now.

In general your entire theory is backed by nothing but feelings and CCP propaganda. Also for it to be correct: all the conspiracy theories have to be 100% right about the CIA back in the day, the CIA can not have not changed since the 70s and also they have to be extremely bad at their jobs. Whereas the more likely explanation is the Chinese made a bio weapon and it leaked out. This is likely because: we have modern evidence that the CCP does not care for human rights and so would do something like this, we know the lab that was near the epicenter was working on sars like viruses to make a vaccine, the sars outbreak shows Chinese micro biology labs are not professional enough to prevent this.

That is called political spin aka propaganda.

Locking up millions of people without trial for being a member of a religion is not reasonable in the slightest. It is ****ing barbaric.

They are not being locked up because they are members of a religion, they are locked up because they are from a region that has a very high presence of religious extremism. The fact that other Chinese Muslims are free to practice Islam is sufficient enough evidence for that: https://time.com/3099950/china-muslim-hui-xinjiang-uighur-islam/
Of course, most of those people are probably innocent and far from being extremists, but that is a necessary sacrifice to deradicalise those that need it.

Anyway, since we are veering off topic into China's stance on religion here, would you say that China's 'cultural genocide' is worse than CIA's support of actual genocides?

So you support locking people up because they are from a certain region? No right to trial or anything?

There is no need for a trial because they are not being punished for having committed a crime - they are being deradicalised because they have a high chance of being extremists, and therefore posing a danger to others.

They are being detained against their will with no trial. And you support that?

People born in Syria have a higher chance of being radicalised, do you support us rounding up every man and women and forcing them into camps for "deradicalisation" purely because of where they were born? And with no trial?

If the extremists already have a significant, dangerous presence somewhere, mostly belong to a specific demographic and are suspected of being backed by foreign powers, then I would say that keeping a close eye on as many members of that demographic as possible, and temporarily detaining those with evidence of being potential extremists is an acceptable way of dealing with the problem. Keep in mind that China did not detain all Uyghurs: only those that appeared the most dangerous were detained (although I am aware the threshold for being labeled as such appears to be rather low), and Uyghur extremism in Xinjiang pales in comparison to extremism by people born in Syria.

It is not exactly a good way, but what other choice did China have? Give them independence, therefore risking subjecting the population of that entire region to a theocracy and weakening themselves against foreign powers?

To answer your edit of your previous comment, I recall the people that initially covered up the virus were just the local Wuhan authorities, and they were later punished for their handling of the issue. I also support China on the matter of Hong Kong. On the other hand, one major issue I do not support China on is its high number of billionaires, but that is what the term 'critical support' is for.

I mean I literally disagree with your whole post but I'm over it now it's getting late.

Where do you reside, as in where do you live?

Well, since this is a British website, is it not safe to assume that most people here live there as well? I live in the UK but a large portion of my family lived in the Soviet Union before it fell apart, and hence I am aware of the contrast between Western propaganda and actual conditions within socialist or semi-socialist states.

Anyhow, good night I guess.

The article mentions that according to Xi Jinping, the objective of such sinicization is to "guide the adaptation of religions to socialist society". Nothing there suggests that they hate religion and want to eradicate it (in fact, they wish to strengthen "the education of religious figures" and give "full play to patriotic religious groups"); they just intend to alter it so that it fits in their society (which is probably the reason why religions appeared in the first place anyway).

Their actions seems completely reasonable as steps taken to avoid religious extremism.