# uniformly valid expansion

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

For (x+epsilon)^1/2, using the binomial expansion we can see that the expansion is valid if x>>epsilon, rescale using (epsilon X) with X=O(1) as epsilon goes to 0 to give an asymptotic expansion that is valid for x< epsilon

What did I do, I substitute x = epsilon X above so ( epsilon X +epsilon) ^1/2, then I rearrange it I applied binomial expansion and the answer is

epsilon ^1/2(( 1 + x/2 - x^2/8 + x^3/16 - (5 x^4)/128 + (7 x^5)/256 + O(x^6))

Is this correct? and to prove that this asymptotic expansion is valid when x<< epsilon.

What did I do, I substitute x = epsilon X above so ( epsilon X +epsilon) ^1/2, then I rearrange it I applied binomial expansion and the answer is

epsilon ^1/2(( 1 + x/2 - x^2/8 + x^3/16 - (5 x^4)/128 + (7 x^5)/256 + O(x^6))

Is this correct? and to prove that this asymptotic expansion is valid when x<< epsilon.

0

reply

Report

#2

(Original post by

For (x+epsilon)^1/2, using the binomial expansion we can see that the expansion is valid if

What did I do, I substitute x = epsilon X above so ( epsilon X +epsilon) ^1/2, then I rearrange it I applied binomial expansion and the answer is

epsilon ^1/2(( 1 + x/2 - x^2/8 + x^3/16 - (5 x^4)/128 + (7 x^5)/256 + O(x^6))

Is this correct? and to prove that this asymptotic expansion is valid whe

**meme12**)For (x+epsilon)^1/2, using the binomial expansion we can see that the expansion is valid if

**x>>epsilon,**rescale using (epsilon X) with X=O(1) as epsilon goes to 0 to give an asymptotic expansion that is valid for x< epsilonWhat did I do, I substitute x = epsilon X above so ( epsilon X +epsilon) ^1/2, then I rearrange it I applied binomial expansion and the answer is

epsilon ^1/2(( 1 + x/2 - x^2/8 + x^3/16 - (5 x^4)/128 + (7 x^5)/256 + O(x^6))

Is this correct? and to prove that this asymptotic expansion is valid whe

**n x<< epsilon**.
Last edited by mqb2766; 10 months ago

0

reply

Not sure what do you mean

I want to rescale (x+epsilon)^1/2 by ................ (1) suing x = epsilon X to make expansion (1) valid when x<< epsilon

So I substitute x= Epsilon X and applied the binomial expansion so the answer is

epsilon ^1/2(( 1 + x/2 - x^2/8 + x^3/16 - (5 x^4)/128 + (7 x^5)/256 + O(x^6))

The first question is this valid for x<< epsilon and

Second, how did you know? Do I substitute just general values and compare

Thanks

I want to rescale (x+epsilon)^1/2 by ................ (1) suing x = epsilon X to make expansion (1) valid when x<< epsilon

So I substitute x= Epsilon X and applied the binomial expansion so the answer is

epsilon ^1/2(( 1 + x/2 - x^2/8 + x^3/16 - (5 x^4)/128 + (7 x^5)/256 + O(x^6))

The first question is this valid for x<< epsilon and

Second, how did you know? Do I substitute just general values and compare

Thanks

0

reply

Report

#4

(Original post by

Not sure what do you mean

I want to rescale (x+epsilon)^1/2 by ................ (1) suing x = epsilon X to make expansion (1) valid when x<< epsilon

So I substitute x= Epsilon X and applied the binomial expansion so the answer is

epsilon ^1/2(( 1 + x/2 - x^2/8 + x^3/16 - (5 x^4)/128 + (7 x^5)/256 + O(x^6))

The first question is this valid for x<< epsilon and

Second, how did you know? Do I substitute just general values and compare

Thanks

**meme12**)Not sure what do you mean

I want to rescale (x+epsilon)^1/2 by ................ (1) suing x = epsilon X to make expansion (1) valid when x<< epsilon

So I substitute x= Epsilon X and applied the binomial expansion so the answer is

epsilon ^1/2(( 1 + x/2 - x^2/8 + x^3/16 - (5 x^4)/128 + (7 x^5)/256 + O(x^6))

The first question is this valid for x<< epsilon and

Second, how did you know? Do I substitute just general values and compare

Thanks

0

reply

when the second term is less than the first term and third less than second and so on

0

reply

Report

#6

(Original post by

when the second term is less than the first term and third less than second and so on

**meme12**)when the second term is less than the first term and third less than second and so on

0

reply

test that this expansion (1) is valid when x<<epsilon , means when each term is less than the previous term .

This how I understood it

This how I understood it

0

reply

Report

#8

(Original post by

test that this expansion (1) is valid when x<<epsilon , means when each term is less than the previous term .

This how I understood it

**meme12**)test that this expansion (1) is valid when x<<epsilon , means when each term is less than the previous term .

This how I understood it

|X| < 1

It's easy enough to look up. Now sub X = x/epsilon to give the result you want. The << doesn't really have a meaning as a test.

0

reply

so the first two terms become 1 + x/2e - x^2/8e^2

which is now valid for x< e ( e is epsilon here )

which is now valid for x< e ( e is epsilon here )

0

reply

Report

#10

(Original post by

so the first two terms become 1 + x/2e - x^2/8e^2

which is now valid for x< e ( e is epsilon here )

**meme12**)so the first two terms become 1 + x/2e - x^2/8e^2

which is now valid for x< e ( e is epsilon here )

0

reply

(Original post by

Yes. But remember you've factored an epsilon^(1/2) out as well.

**mqb2766**)Yes. But remember you've factored an epsilon^(1/2) out as well.

Last edited by Great444; 10 months ago

0

reply

Report

#12

(Original post by

yes but we did the same for ( x+e)^1/2 ... it becomes x^1/2(1+e/x)^1/2 and we said it's valid only when x>e

**meme12**)yes but we did the same for ( x+e)^1/2 ... it becomes x^1/2(1+e/x)^1/2 and we said it's valid only when x>e

1

reply

Thank you for the help, I will go through it again to understand it more.

1

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top