Good afternoon
I Got an biomedical sciences conditional from both, and i am still deciding which of these 2 should I put as my insurance choice.
I like both of the course structures and I'm indifferent about the nightlife and atmosphere/culture of the areas.
The only thing that's preventing me from making a decision is on which uni is better at teaching and which will have a higher chance of getting me a job when I graduate.
Knowing that royal Holloway is accredited by the royal society of biology while Uni of Surrey is accredited by the Institute of Biomedical Science (IBMS) confused me in a way that i dont really know what the difference and what advantage do they respectively give.
i think the fact that it is Ibms accredited help you to work in nhs (im not sure but then then what the point of the Royal society one?)
Surrey is in the biosciences Guardian University Guide 2020 rank as the 8th and is TEF gold (while rhul is the 64th and is TEF silver )
And 36th in complet uni guide 2020 in biological science subject area while rhul is 46th.
rhul is asking ABB while surrey is asking BBB so i was also thinking how lenient they are if in case you miss the grade by a little bit?
In the uni guide the Most popular A-Levels studied (and grade achieved) are bio chem math with BCB (respectively) while for surrey it is BBB (same as the entry requirement) , even though i know it's all about how popular is the course (which vary every year) so these statistics are not "reliable"
I live in deep south west London ( ALMOST not considered in London, rhul is quite close by car while Surrey is around 30 min as well).