My experience with York St John counselling psychology PhD interview

Watch
hatlover45
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 4 weeks ago
#1
I recently had an Counselling Psychology PhD interview with York St John University. I just wanted to say for any preparing for next year, they used a mixed style MMI interview, with 3 stations and an online survey. The process was over Zoom. It was completely demoralising and horrible experience for me.

The three stage interview was 5 questions about me and why I want to do the course, it gave me 8 minutes to answer before moving on to the next stage with a different interviewer. It was a dehumanising process, I could not even get to say "How are you?" or get to know the interviewer. None of my personality got across and I felt like a number to be ticked off in a list. After the first stage, the next two stages were roleplay interviews, with different interviewers. Same thing, I didn't get to ask how their day was or anything, straight to roleplay and punted off to the next stage.

MMI style interviews, I would seriously question the validity of them. The style orignated in Candna in 2014, University of Toronto. It has been adopted by mainly the medical field. I would like to know if its effective when it comes to people with learning difficulties. I bet the original study omitted students who were neurodiverse or have learning difficulties. Its a cheap and poor method for choosing students and its a demoralising process.
Last edited by hatlover45; 4 weeks ago
0
reply
stereotypeasian
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#2
Report 4 weeks ago
#2
when you fail to prepare you prepare to fail :dontknow:
0
reply
Kitten in boots
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#3
Report 4 weeks ago
#3
So basically you bombed an interview and are looking for someone to blame?
1
reply
hatlover45
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#4
Report Thread starter 4 weeks ago
#4
I am warning people that this style can be dehumanising when it is done in this manner. When you cannot actually have time to even say hello without feeling pressure to move on and cannot ask simple pleasantries when you are trying to enter a mental health profession...... Does not that speak volumes to the interview system?

A lot of people search for interview tips and tricks and what PhD interviews are like, I gave my view. I did prepare and did look at scoring at these MMI style interviews. I question the disability factor in regarding this style and if it has been researched if there is a signifcant disadvantage to students with disabilities.
0
reply
stereotypeasian
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#5
Report 4 weeks ago
#5
I mean you could've asked "how are you and other simple pleasantries" after answering the questions at a station if you had time left over

I find it hard to believe there isn't any medical students/current doctors without learning difficulties, even if its just a small percentage

Life isn't fair - from the looks of it , if I haven't read it wrong, you haven't been rejected yet so you are waiting for a reply and are probably just overthinking about how the interview went

You are going to be offended/not enjoy this sentence but you're kinda being like "its not me, it my disabilities" - going to hate to break it to you are more than your disabilities and you are not defined by them and disabilities are not a personality trait

Essentially MMIs are three interviews put into one, it makes it non biased if possible like if you had a panel with two people if both of them dislike you/don't think you're suitable then essentially you are out of the race whereas now you could a station you didn't do well in and do better in the others one and potentially still get in

Also there are more factors coming into play, like its done over zoom rather than in person due to covid-19 etc.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

How do you feel about your grades? Are they...

What I expected (114)
25.85%
Better than expected (92)
20.86%
Worse than expected (235)
53.29%

Watched Threads

View All