# My Physics Teacher doesn't know any Calculus

Watch
Announcements

My physics teacher doesn't know even the basics of differentiation or integration.

She was completely unaware of most overlaps between the maths syllabus and physics with topics such as simple harmonic motion, circular motion etc despite teaching A-Level physics for a number of years. She was hopeless with logarithms when doing nuclear decay. And she definitely had no clue how to derive any shm equations and nuclear decay equations because she seemingly no maths skill. She supposedly has a physics degree but I heard physics degrees are maths heavy. She has also said that a degree is easier than A-Level. The physics surely gets much harder at University. It did always seem like she memorised things and never had a mathematical understanding of how things worked. She would say she derived equations from the "definitions" by remembering the sentences rather than how to manipulate the equation.

This has really made me question what qualifications she really has. On top of these, she often makes mistakes like saying there are uniform gravitational waves between 2 books. Yes, 2 books. She also once taught that the outer layer of stars was made out of iron and the innermost was hydrogen until she was corrected by someone *cough* *cough*. She also didn't understand that a falling object could have negative acceleration.

What do you think? Is it a common occurrence for A-Level Physics teachers to be unaware of basic A-level maths concepts. Is this teacher a fraud?

She was completely unaware of most overlaps between the maths syllabus and physics with topics such as simple harmonic motion, circular motion etc despite teaching A-Level physics for a number of years. She was hopeless with logarithms when doing nuclear decay. And she definitely had no clue how to derive any shm equations and nuclear decay equations because she seemingly no maths skill. She supposedly has a physics degree but I heard physics degrees are maths heavy. She has also said that a degree is easier than A-Level. The physics surely gets much harder at University. It did always seem like she memorised things and never had a mathematical understanding of how things worked. She would say she derived equations from the "definitions" by remembering the sentences rather than how to manipulate the equation.

This has really made me question what qualifications she really has. On top of these, she often makes mistakes like saying there are uniform gravitational waves between 2 books. Yes, 2 books. She also once taught that the outer layer of stars was made out of iron and the innermost was hydrogen until she was corrected by someone *cough* *cough*. She also didn't understand that a falling object could have negative acceleration.

What do you think? Is it a common occurrence for A-Level Physics teachers to be unaware of basic A-level maths concepts. Is this teacher a fraud?

0

reply

Report

#2

The same has happened with me and I had to work hard all on my own to clear the exams.

there should be some monitoring or something by the board.

there should be some monitoring or something by the board.

1

reply

Report

#3

I don't think it's that uncommon, I saw a similar but distinct problem when I was doing my A Levels. In my case teachers were pushed into teaching A Level courses that didn't match well with their degree, e.g the "wrong" science or an applied science degree which maybe didn't have much relevant content. My amateur observation was that a net outflow of older and more experienced teachers (a mix of retirements, leaving the profession altogether and changing schools) was only being partially compensated by recruitment of new teachers, who tended to be younger and come from a different sort of academic background. Not sure if this was a peculiarity of my school or more common in the industry.

[I think it's also well worth noting that most of my teachers were excellent, both knowledgeable in the subject and effective at teaching. Even those who weren't great for A Levels were popular with lower years where the material was easier and less specialised. And some of my best teachers had spend significant amounts of time in industry before taking up teaching.]

[I think it's also well worth noting that most of my teachers were excellent, both knowledgeable in the subject and effective at teaching. Even those who weren't great for A Levels were popular with lower years where the material was easier and less specialised. And some of my best teachers had spend significant amounts of time in industry before taking up teaching.]

Last edited by 15Characters...; 4 months ago

0

reply

Report

#4

Chronic shortage of Physics teachers:

https://www.reedglobal.com/blog/2020...-overseas-help

https://www.theguardian.com/careers/...ience-shortage

https://www.tes.com/news/6-worrying-...uitment-crisis

"Targets were not met for primary and secondary teachers. The figures for 2019/2020 reveal particularly low rates in recruiting trainee teachers in chemistry, computing, maths, modern foreign languages and physics.

"Half of maths and physics teachers quit within five years" Guardian excerpt.

"The NFER's Teacher Labour Market in England Annual Report 2020, based on data collected prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, shows that

https://www.reedglobal.com/blog/2020...-overseas-help

https://www.theguardian.com/careers/...ience-shortage

https://www.tes.com/news/6-worrying-...uitment-crisis

"Targets were not met for primary and secondary teachers. The figures for 2019/2020 reveal particularly low rates in recruiting trainee teachers in chemistry, computing, maths, modern foreign languages and physics.

**Physics was hit hardest, only reaching 43% of the 2019 target**; even lower than the 47% achieved in 2018." Reed Employment"Half of maths and physics teachers quit within five years" Guardian excerpt.

"The NFER's Teacher Labour Market in England Annual Report 2020, based on data collected prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, shows that

**the recruitment situation has "significantly worsened" for shortage subjects at secondary level, such as physics**, maths, modern foreign languages (MFL) and chemistry." Tes website.
3

reply

Report

#5

(Original post by

I don't think it's that uncommon, I saw a similar but distinct problem when I was doing my A Levels. In my case teachers were pushed into teaching A Level courses that didn't match well with their degree, e.g the "wrong" science or an applied science degree which maybe didn't have much relevant content. My amateur observation was that a net outflow of older and more experienced teachers (a mix of retirements, leaving the profession altogether and changing schools) was only being partially compensated by recruitment of new teachers, who tended to be younger and come from a different sort of academic background. Not sure if this was a peculiarity of my school or more common in the industry.

[I think it's also well worth noting that most of my teachers were excellent, both knowledgeable in the subject and effective at teaching. Even those who weren't great for A Levels were popular with lower years where the material was easier and less specialised. And some of my best teachers had spend significant amounts of time in industry before taking up teaching.]

**15Characters...**)I don't think it's that uncommon, I saw a similar but distinct problem when I was doing my A Levels. In my case teachers were pushed into teaching A Level courses that didn't match well with their degree, e.g the "wrong" science or an applied science degree which maybe didn't have much relevant content. My amateur observation was that a net outflow of older and more experienced teachers (a mix of retirements, leaving the profession altogether and changing schools) was only being partially compensated by recruitment of new teachers, who tended to be younger and come from a different sort of academic background. Not sure if this was a peculiarity of my school or more common in the industry.

[I think it's also well worth noting that most of my teachers were excellent, both knowledgeable in the subject and effective at teaching. Even those who weren't great for A Levels were popular with lower years where the material was easier and less specialised. And some of my best teachers had spend significant amounts of time in industry before taking up teaching.]

0

reply

Report

#6

(Original post by

is there any way we can complain the boards to monitor or check such schools?

**Kk1999**)is there any way we can complain the boards to monitor or check such schools?

0

reply

Report

#7

(Original post by

As far as I'm aware, exam boards have no control over the quality of teaching in a school. That is part of Ofsted's role.

**Lightning720**)As far as I'm aware, exam boards have no control over the quality of teaching in a school. That is part of Ofsted's role.

0

reply

Report

#8

(Original post by

What do you think? Is it a common occurrence for A-Level Physics teachers to be unaware of basic A-level maths concepts. Is this teacher a fraud?

**blackugo**)What do you think? Is it a common occurrence for A-Level Physics teachers to be unaware of basic A-level maths concepts. Is this teacher a fraud?

*has*a physics degree. In all likelihood, such is the difficulty in recruiting specialist physics teachers, she's either done a small amount of physics as part of a wider degree, or hasn't actually done physics since A level, and is technically a chemistry teacher who has been roped into teaching physics.

You're being snotty about the wrong person, basically. She probably hates teaching it as much as you hate having it taught by a non-specialist. You should be making your complaint to SLT/Ho6th about why there isn't adequate specialist provision for physics at your school.

2

reply

Report

#9

I teach chemistry (in one of the top twenty schools in the country) and I don't have a chemistry degree - none of my modules on my degree were even chemistry.

Even if she did physics, it isn't a given that she has a straight physics degree - it could have been a combined degree.

Even if she did physics, it isn't a given that she has a straight physics degree - it could have been a combined degree.

0

reply

Report

#10

(Original post by

But the schools are certified right... so how is it possible for them to be certified without standards??

**Kk1999**)But the schools are certified right... so how is it possible for them to be certified without standards??

Teaching is actually a crap job in the UK!

You could complain but a school cannot give you what they haven't got!

0

reply

Report

#11

**Kk1999**)

is there any way we can complain the boards to monitor or check such schools?

**Kk1999**)

But the schools are certified right... so how is it possible for them to be certified without standards??

0

reply

Report

#12

**Kk1999**)

is there any way we can complain the boards to monitor or check such schools?

0

reply

Report

#13

(Original post by

Chronic shortage of Physics teachers:

https://www.reedglobal.com/blog/2020...-overseas-help

https://www.theguardian.com/careers/...ience-shortage

https://www.tes.com/news/6-worrying-...uitment-crisis

"Targets were not met for primary and secondary teachers. The figures for 2019/2020 reveal particularly low rates in recruiting trainee teachers in chemistry, computing, maths, modern foreign languages and physics.

"Half of maths and physics teachers quit within five years" Guardian excerpt.

"The NFER's Teacher Labour Market in England Annual Report 2020, based on data collected prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, shows that

**uberteknik**)Chronic shortage of Physics teachers:

https://www.reedglobal.com/blog/2020...-overseas-help

https://www.theguardian.com/careers/...ience-shortage

https://www.tes.com/news/6-worrying-...uitment-crisis

"Targets were not met for primary and secondary teachers. The figures for 2019/2020 reveal particularly low rates in recruiting trainee teachers in chemistry, computing, maths, modern foreign languages and physics.

**Physics was hit hardest, only reaching 43% of the 2019 target**; even lower than the 47% achieved in 2018." Reed Employment"Half of maths and physics teachers quit within five years" Guardian excerpt.

"The NFER's Teacher Labour Market in England Annual Report 2020, based on data collected prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, shows that

**the recruitment situation has "significantly worsened" for shortage subjects at secondary level, such as physics**, maths, modern foreign languages (MFL) and chemistry." Tes website.
0

reply

Report

#14

(Original post by

The same has happened with me and I had to work hard all on my own to clear the exams.

there should be some monitoring or something by the board.

**Kk1999**)The same has happened with me and I had to work hard all on my own to clear the exams.

there should be some monitoring or something by the board.

0

reply

Report

#15

(Original post by

No, you should read some of the previous posts. It is not always about "standards". There is a chronuc shortage of subject qualified chemistry, maths and physics teachers! Graduates in those subjects go elsewhere!

Teaching is actually a crap job in the UK!

You could complain but a school cannot give you what they haven't got!

**mgi**)No, you should read some of the previous posts. It is not always about "standards". There is a chronuc shortage of subject qualified chemistry, maths and physics teachers! Graduates in those subjects go elsewhere!

Teaching is actually a crap job in the UK!

You could complain but a school cannot give you what they haven't got!

I actually don't want this to happen with others cuz I had to face a lot of hardships during my time...

Maybe the graduates demand a good salary!

That's happened in my place, They left because of the salary....

0

reply

Report

#16

(Original post by

no , that would be the school headteacher and Ofsted! lots of well qualified graduates don't want to be teachers. I can't think why?lol

**mgi**)no , that would be the school headteacher and Ofsted! lots of well qualified graduates don't want to be teachers. I can't think why?lol

0

reply

Report

#17

(Original post by

that's the school leadership team's job! But there are major teacher shortages because the job ain't good tbh!

**mgi**)that's the school leadership team's job! But there are major teacher shortages because the job ain't good tbh!

Inwas branded a hypocrite for doing that but I feel I did the right thing by saving other students time and efforts.

0

reply

Report

#18

(Original post by

Precisely. A job to avoid! Crap wages. crap workinh conditions, high stress!

**mgi**)Precisely. A job to avoid! Crap wages. crap workinh conditions, high stress!

I am a teacher but I don't teach Physics... I wish I could

0

reply

Report

#19

(Original post by

My physics teacher doesn't know even the basics of differentiation or integration.

She was completely unaware of most overlaps between the maths syllabus and physics with topics such as simple harmonic motion, circular motion etc despite teaching A-Level physics for a number of years. She was hopeless with logarithms when doing nuclear decay. And she definitely had no clue how to derive any shm equations and nuclear decay equations because she seemingly no maths skill. She supposedly has a physics degree but I heard physics degrees are maths heavy. She has also said that a degree is easier than A-Level. The physics surely gets much harder at University. It did always seem like she memorised things and never had a mathematical understanding of how things worked. She would say she derived equations from the "definitions" by remembering the sentences rather than how to manipulate the equation.

This has really made me question what qualifications she really has. On top of these, she often makes mistakes like saying there are uniform gravitational waves between 2 books. Yes, 2 books. She also once taught that the outer layer of stars was made out of iron and the innermost was hydrogen until she was corrected by someone *cough* *cough*. She also didn't understand that a falling object could have negative acceleration.

What do you think? Is it a common occurrence for A-Level Physics teachers to be unaware of basic A-level maths concepts. Is this teacher a fraud?

**blackugo**)My physics teacher doesn't know even the basics of differentiation or integration.

She was completely unaware of most overlaps between the maths syllabus and physics with topics such as simple harmonic motion, circular motion etc despite teaching A-Level physics for a number of years. She was hopeless with logarithms when doing nuclear decay. And she definitely had no clue how to derive any shm equations and nuclear decay equations because she seemingly no maths skill. She supposedly has a physics degree but I heard physics degrees are maths heavy. She has also said that a degree is easier than A-Level. The physics surely gets much harder at University. It did always seem like she memorised things and never had a mathematical understanding of how things worked. She would say she derived equations from the "definitions" by remembering the sentences rather than how to manipulate the equation.

This has really made me question what qualifications she really has. On top of these, she often makes mistakes like saying there are uniform gravitational waves between 2 books. Yes, 2 books. She also once taught that the outer layer of stars was made out of iron and the innermost was hydrogen until she was corrected by someone *cough* *cough*. She also didn't understand that a falling object could have negative acceleration.

What do you think? Is it a common occurrence for A-Level Physics teachers to be unaware of basic A-level maths concepts. Is this teacher a fraud?

0

reply

Report

#20

(Original post by

Those teams are just playing with our lives... and potentials... ngl I sued my school after graduating.

Inwas branded a hypocrite for doing that but I feel I did the right thing by saving other students time and efforts.

**Kk1999**)Those teams are just playing with our lives... and potentials... ngl I sued my school after graduating.

Inwas branded a hypocrite for doing that but I feel I did the right thing by saving other students time and efforts.

You haven't 'saved other students time and efforts', and you didn't 'do the right thing'. Petulant litigation just costs money which schools don't have, time which schools don't have and results in literally zero actual change, and for what purpose? Some desire for retribution?

1

reply

X

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top