The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

vaanish
You, my freind, are either a first class idiot or a first class troll.


:ditto:

I'd like to see what he'd say if he or someone close to him were abused by a paedophile. Quite frankly, they can't be rehabilitated, and deserve to have their rights taken off them when they take the life out of others. I can understand what he is saying, but hating a victim over the abuser is just downright disgusting.
Reply 41
.pushing.charlotte.
all i can say is this; no i don't believe in vigilante justice, peaceful protest? yes.

and of course i wouldn't kill him/wish him dead.
as i said before it's just what the small terrified 11 year old inside of me wants to happen.

if i was to face him with a gun in my hand i'd be more likely to shoot my own foot than to shoot him.

and anyone judging me for how i feel about this should really take into consideration the fact that i have past issues and so it's not just 'run-of-the-mill' 'ZOMG!!11!! KILL DA BAD GUY!'


Tell me, in your opinion: What should happen to this guy?

If you believe in peaceful protest, and I assume you refere to protesting against him remaining in your village... where exactly would you place him instead? He is legally entitled to his freedom to live in this country.
Reply 42
I can't believe how insensitive some people are. The OP hasn't said she WILL go after him, just that she wishes on some level that someone would do something about it. Hardly surprising after what she's been through.

OP, I'm really sorry for you. Have you thought about seeing a professional to help you to deal more with your trauma? Glitter will have EVERYONE'S eyes on him so there's basically no way he will be able to do anything. In a strange way you should be thankful it's him and not a different one.
TSR really does confuse me sometimes.
I got negged for creating this thread.
And this, my friends, is why i hate the TSR rep system.
Reply 44
Jordan1990
How in hell does he deserve to be allowed to lead a normal life? Those children he abused will never get their childhood back, no amount of therapy, money, revenge will get them that time back.
Imagine if it was your children who had been abused, then see how you would feel, you would feel immense hatred and want them to throw him away and for the guard to swallow the key.

Bah!
I hate idiots like you!


An eye for an eye eh? Thankfully the legal system in this country is not run by revengful morons such as yourself.
Reue
Yes, she was abused as a kid, yes she may have hurtful feelings, but wishing that kind of treatment to another human being is unjustified.

He has served his time, the police do not believe him to be a threat. Why can you not accept that.

As for your "once a peado always a paedo" nonsense, I suggest you lookup the work 'rehabilitation'.


1 - It really isn't unjustified. She was abused and doesn't want it to happen to anyone else.
2 - He may have served his time, and the police do consider him to be a threat, hence why they are going to monitor him.
3 - Unless he is chemically castrated, he will always divert his sexual feelings towards underage kids/teens. Paedophiles have the highest rate of re-offending for your information...

I find it hard to believe people can be so liberal about these people.

:rolleyes:
.pushing.charlotte.
TSR really does confuse me sometimes.
I got negged for creating this thread.
And this, my friends, is why i hate the TSR rep system.


Hey, you negged me for trying to give advice.
RightSaidJames
If he's known to be a paedophile by the general public, then he couldn't possibly re-offend. If he's been released he's not a danger to others. And most paedophiles are greatly ashamed of their behaviour and their thoughts, for all you know he has made a mistake which he will never make again.

EDIT - oh crap, it's Gary Glitter. Don't know much about him, but he's definitely not your average paedophile... nonetheless, most of my unedited post still stands.


Sorry, I am not usually argumentative but he could re-offend again, he served time in Britain for child abuse and pornography...still did it again, so thats a load of ******** to be perfectly honest with you
Reply 48
.pushing.charlotte.
TSR really does confuse me sometimes.
I got negged for creating this thread.
And this, my friends, is why i hate the TSR rep system.


On the plus side, I pos repped you yesterday, which i expect was worth alot more then the neg rep you recieved just now :wink:
Reue
Tell me, in your opinion: What should happen to this guy?

If you believe in peaceful protest, and I assume you refere to protesting against him remaining in your village... where exactly would you place him instead? He is legally entitled to his freedom to live in this country.


i would of course, in a perfect way have him away from my village and my younger sibling/relatives.

i would perfer to have him located away from 2 primary schools, a beach, and a childs play area/park.

i would also like ALL the local children to be shown pictures of this man and warned to stay well away from the road he is living in and to cross the street to avoid him, etc. but due to human rights i'm guessing this is probably against his?

this is *unfortunately* the sort of place where parents feel safe to send there 10 year olds over to their friends house 5-10 mins away alone.
Reue
On the plus side, I pos repped you yesterday, which i expect was worth alot more then the neg rep you recieved just now :wink:

very true :smile:
and thanks for the rep yesterday, made me smile :smile:
Speedbird2008

3 - Unless he is chemically castrated, he will always divert his sexual feelings towards underage kids/teens.

I find it hard to believe people can be so liberal about these people.

:rolleyes:


"These people" don't choose to be attracted to children, no more than a gay man is attracted to a member of his own sex. It's only when they act on their feelings that it becomes wrong, because a child cannot legally consent.
Reply 52
Speedbird2008
1 - It really isn't unjustified. She was abused and doesn't want it to happen to anyone else.
2 - He may have served his time, and the police do consider him to be a threat, hence why they are going to monitor him.
3 - Unless he is chemically castrated, he will always divert his sexual feelings towards underage kids/teens. Paedophiles have the highest rate of re-offending for your information...

I find it hard to believe people can be so liberal about these people.

:rolleyes:


Sorry but i completly disagree that violence is ever the way forward. Regardless of the intended outcome.

The police do not consider him to be a serious threat.

I strongly disagree with your last point as there have been hundreds of cases of convicted peadophile whom were rehabilitated and have gone on to lead normal lives.
Reue
An eye for an eye eh? Thankfully the legal system in this country is not run by revengful morons such as yourself.


Me a moron?
Read your posts!

Try and think about how you would feel in the OP's shoes
At the end of the day, hes done it twice how are people of Britain supposed to feel?
Lives are ruined because of paedophiles and you expect everyone to just sit back and say 'oh its ok! he served his time! he learnt his lesson!
Dont think so somehow!
Reue
Very saddening to hear about your personal experiences.

As the above has already mentioned: If they considered him to still be a risk to others, he would not have been released.

Do you know anything about his conviction. I should point out that a large majority of 'convicted' pedophiles have never harmed anyone before and probabley never would. Being a pedophile does not mean someone will go out and commit sexual assult.


How do you mean? How can a person be convicted of paedophilia if they haven't harmed anybody? :confused:
Reply 55
.pushing.charlotte.
very true :smile:
and thanks for the rep yesterday, made me smile :smile:


Haha, no problem. Was very true :wink:
DisgruntledMoth
"These people" don't choose to be attracted to children, no more than a gay man is attracted to a member of his own sex. It's only when they act on their feelings that it becomes wrong, because a child cannot legally consent.


which is why i probably should have specified 'convicted peadophile' in my thread title.

sorry.
Reply 57
Vampyrcorn
How do you mean? How can a person be convicted of paedophilia if they haven't harmed anybody? :confused:


The masses of unfortunate teenagers being forced to sign the sex register because they had sex with their 15yr old consenting girlfriends springs immediatly to mind.
.pushing.charlotte.
TSR really does confuse me sometimes.
I got negged for creating this thread.
And this, my friends, is why i hate the TSR rep system.


:console:
Don't let them drag you into a giant debate about this, it's not worth it.
Reply 59
DisgruntledMoth
"These people" don't choose to be attracted to children, no more than a gay man is attracted to a member of his own sex. It's only when they act on their feelings that it becomes wrong, because a child cannot legally consent.


So wot we r on about a convicted peadophile here

Latest

Trending

Trending