•
An article about current health issue (i.e. coronavirus, SARS, Ebola, heart disease, lung cancer, and chronic lower respiratory diseases etc.)
•
An article about current social care issue (aging population, debates about vaccinations, growing population, wating times in the NHS, UK government spending on the NHS, lack of staff in the healthcare sector, many people leaving the healthcare sector, funding towards NHS staff etc.)
•
Facts, figures and data relating to secondary sources covering the article’s area of research
•
The research methods used in the learner’s own secondary research
•
Choose one of the two articles that your tutors will provide you with, either an article about a current health issue or an article about a current social care issue
•
After choosing one article make sure you understand it by reading it through again and again, to highlighting it
•
Once you understood the article find other sources relating to the article which are current within the last 5 years (this is called secondary sources)
•
These secondary sources are used for comparing and contrasting the main article with secondary sources (or even comparing two secondary sources
•
There’s no limit to how many secondary sources you can used however, when you make your own references it needs to be within four sides of A4
•
You don’t need to print your main article as it will be there in Part B
•
You can’t print your secondary sources and bring it with you to your supervised assessment
•
Four sides of A4 four your notes (size 12 point on Microsoft word, google docs etc. it can also be handwritten)
•
Four sides of A4 for you reference list of secondary sources (There is no requirement for Harvard referencing in your sources, you can just list different links)
•
Ethics
•
Bias
•
Pilot study
•
Secondary Sources
•
Secondary research
•
Qualitative Research
•
Quantitative Research
•
Limitations
•
Validity
•
Reliability
•
Surveys (Quantitative)
•
Interviews (Qualitative)
•
Focus Groups (Qualitative)
•
Experiments (Quantitative)
•
Mixed Methods (Qualitative and Quantitative)
•
Questionnaire (Quantitative)
•
Secondary Data Analysis (Both)
•
Case Study (Both)
•
Observations (Participant and non-participant)
•
Longitudinal Studies (Both)
•
Primary Data (Both)
•
Activity 1 = 15 Marks
•
Activity 2 = 15 Marks
•
Activity 3 = 20 Marks
•
Activity 4 = 15 Marks
•
Saying whether the main article is reliable
•
Who was the authors? Do they have an history of education around this specific field
•
The year that it was made, whether of not their data is true
•
Is it valid
•
Should they use a different research method
•
Justifying why you think that way i.e. they should have used in the main article questionnaires instead of interviews BECAUSE it’s less time consuming and you get more samples), see how I added because? This is called justifying
•
But
•
However
•
Moreover
•
On the other hand
•
Also
•
This (Article here) supports (secondary source here) as they both.....
•
This (Article here) disagrees with (secondary sources here) as they....
•
This data in the (article here) is back up by (enter secondary source(s) here) as....
•
Similar to...
•
Likewise
Scroll to see replies
•
How quantitative research methods have been used to improve reliability
•
You explained the research methods they used in the article, demonstrating a thorough understanding of data usage; response includes fully supported evaluative judgements on suitability
•
Your conclusions on suitability of research methods are offered and fully supported, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the concept in the context of the methods used
•
Explain what quantitative research is
•
Explain what research method they used in the article (was it an interview?, survey?, questionnaire?) then compare it to your secondary research (What reesarch methods have they used? and was it quantitative to qualitative?) and explain the definition of the research method
•
Talk about how they extracted data compared to your secondary scources (i.e. In the article they used 181 people however they didn't say how many men and women were there, their age. location etc)
•
Define reliability
•
Is quantitative research reliable or not and explain the pros and cons of it? (can it be repeated? is it accurate?)
•
Did this quantitative reserch method in the article improved their reliability compared to other secondary sources? (clue: consider looking at the date, who the author was, the sample size, did they use graphs?)
•
Define sutability
•
You analysed (meaning explaining and critiquing) the issue, leading to conclusions about the issue’s importance
•
You provided relevant examples of how the issue affects individuals and/or professionals and/or the wider society, which are fully supported by your secondary research findings
•
Your secondary research findings and their relationship to the issue (which is the diagnosis for individuals with arthritis) in the article are explained and you demonstrated a thorough understanding of the relationship between the two
•
Explain whether the aricle is reliable or not or are there some parts that are reliable and some parts are not? and why (for example in the article they didn't explain individuals levels of different proteins in their blood by using graphs making it unreliable as it will be diffcult to compare this data with other data on similar things)
•
Provide 3 to 4 examples from you secondary sources to show evidence on why that research is more/less reliable compared to your article (What research method did they use to make it more/less reliable than the article)
•
Provide current (Past 5 years) examples from your secondary sources to show how the issue (arthritis) can affect individuials (remember PIES), professionals and society (i.e. arthritis can affect the individual as they are restricted in their movements, arthritis can affect society because it can affect social relationships also pain and loss of independence can make people feel frustrated, angry, and depressed, which can in turn affect other members of the family and friends)
•
If the article is unreliable and gives false information how can it affect the individual, society and professionals?
•
Compare your seconday sources to the article about arthritis (Do they come to the same conclusion, what method is the most reliable method from your secondary sources)
•
What reliable method should the article use instead? and why are these methods reliable?
•
If the article and your secondary scources are reliable and provides accurate information how can it affect individuals, society and professionals?
•
You conclusion should explain why it's important to develop reliable methods on diagnosis for individuals with arthritis by summarising your points it should start with: In conlusion, the reason why it's important to develop reliable methods on the diagnosis for individuals with arthritis is because....
•
Your implications of the research for provision/practice in the sector are analysed and explained systematically
•
Your implications referred to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the issue and its context in the article and wider research; likely to include recommendations for change which are justified
•
Your justifications for these implications are always offered and fully supported
•
Explain how the article and the secondary research can change the provision/practice of how healthcare professionals look after peoplw with arthritis (for example, according to this secondary research it recommended that health care professionals should arthritis yearly check ups for people over 70 by the healthcare professionals setting this up as their healthcare policy research should that it can prevent the issue from being worse)
•
Explain why these recommendations/evidence in the article or secondary sources shouls be implemented in hospital Iis it because it save time? Is it because it can help to spot early signs of arthritis?)
•
Provide recommendations on what things healthcare professionals should implement (based on the article and your secondary sources) to care for people with arthritis?
•
Then conclude by sumarising your points that you've written
•
The ethical issues to be considered
•
The research methods to be used and the objectives of the research
•
You provided rationalised consideration of suggested research methods and improvements/changes that could be made, demonstrating a thorough understanding of method effectiveness/suitability
•
Your response demonstrates thorough analytical approach. Coverage of planning considerations, ethical issues and necessary research skills required to explore the issue demonstrates a thorough understanding of practical problems of conducting research in the context, addressed in a logical sustained systematic way
•
You provided judgements on importance of considerations which are fully supported (meaning you provided evidence consistently) with secondary sources
•
What should Ajay think about before conducting his research? (bias, conducting a pilot study, his hypothesis, things that may hinder him from conducting this experiment, time, location, justify his reasons why he's focusing on women over 50
•
What could be an ethical issue when conducting this research? (will this study get through to the ethica board?)
•
Why are is it important for him to consider things? (why should he thing about the location of the interview? It's becuase of confidentiality and making these women feel unformfortable, why should he consider whether to do a structured interview or unstructured interview? what's better?)
•
What should he change in his planned research? What do you recommend he should do and why? (i.e. he should get a bigger sample, various locations in the UK making it sutiable to generalise the population, he should conduct the interview in a private room because...., provide open questions)
•
What research method should he use intead should he stick to this research method what are the pros and cons of his current method? (shouls he use a questionnaire instead? should he use mixed methods)
•
What do you think his hypothesis should be?
•
What do you think the practical problems could be when conducting the research (i.e. how long the interview is?, what practical problems have the artical and your seondary sources faced when doing these researches)
•
Will there be any bias in his research? Can you point out any bias that might come into this reseach? (for example you can develop a bond during interviews, you can ask leading questions which leads to a yes or no answer)
•
What research skills does he need before conducting the research? (i.e. critical thinking, recording data, the shedule of when the research takes place, critical analysis)
•
Do your article and secondary sources talked about their hypothesis in their research? Did they discuss about bias?
•
Based on the article and the secondary souces do you think he's correct for using this research method?
•
Explain how effective and suitable is his research method is compared to the article and your secondary sources? (do you think is more or less?)
•
What has your article and secondary sources did wrong that Ajay should be aware of?
•
The ethical issues to be considered
•
The research methods to be used and the objectives of the research
•
You provided rationalised consideration of suggested research methods and improvements/changes that could be made, demonstrating a thorough understanding of method effectiveness/suitability
•
Your response demonstrates thorough analytical approach. Coverage of planning considerations, ethical issues and necessary research skills required to explore the issue demonstrates a thorough understanding of practical problems of conducting research in the context, addressed in a logical sustained systematic way
•
You provided judgements on importance of considerations which are fully supported (meaning you provided evidence consistently) with secondary sources
•
What should Ajay think about before conducting his research? (bias, conducting a pilot study, his hypothesis, things that may hinder him from conducting this experiment, time, location, justify his reasons why he's focusing on women over 50
•
What could be an ethical issue when conducting this research? (will this study get through to the ethica board?)
•
Why are is it important for him to consider things? (why should he thing about the location of the interview? It's becuase of confidentiality and making these women feel unformfortable, why should he consider whether to do a structured interview or unstructured interview? what's better?)
•
What should he change in his planned research? What do you recommend he should do and why? (i.e. he should get a bigger sample, various locations in the UK making it sutiable to generalise the population, he should conduct the interview in a private room because...., provide open questions)
•
What research method should he use intead should he stick to this research method what are the pros and cons of his current method? (shouls he use a questionnaire instead? should he use mixed methods)
•
What do you think his hypothesis should be?
•
What do you think the practical problems could be when conducting the research (i.e. how long the interview is?, what practical problems have the artical and your seondary sources faced when doing these researches)
•
Will there be any bias in his research? Can you point out any bias that might come into this reseach? (for example you can develop a bond during interviews, you can ask leading questions which leads to a yes or no answer)
•
What research skills does he need before conducting the research? (i.e. critical thinking, recording data, the shedule of when the research takes place, critical analysis)
•
Do your article and secondary sources talked about their hypothesis in their research? Did they discuss about bias?
•
Based on the article and the secondary souces do you think he's correct for using this research method?
•
Explain how effective and suitable is his research method is compared to the article and your secondary sources? (do you think is more or less?)
•
What has your article and secondary sources did wrong that Ajay should be aware of?
•
An article about current health issue (i.e. coronavirus, SARS, Ebola, heart disease, lung cancer, and chronic lower respiratory diseases etc.)
•
An article about current social care issue (aging population, debates about vaccinations, growing population, wating times in the NHS, UK government spending on the NHS, lack of staff in the healthcare sector, many people leaving the healthcare sector, funding towards NHS staff etc.)
•
Facts, figures and data relating to secondary sources covering the article’s area of research
•
The research methods used in the learner’s own secondary research
•
Choose one of the two articles that your tutors will provide you with, either an article about a current health issue or an article about a current social care issue
•
After choosing one article make sure you understand it by reading it through again and again, to highlighting it
•
Once you understood the article find other sources relating to the article which are current within the last 5 years (this is called secondary sources)
•
These secondary sources are used for comparing and contrasting the main article with secondary sources (or even comparing two secondary sources
•
There’s no limit to how many secondary sources you can used however, when you make your own references it needs to be within four sides of A4
•
You don’t need to print your main article as it will be there in Part B
•
You can’t print your secondary sources and bring it with you to your supervised assessment
•
Four sides of A4 four your notes (size 12 point on Microsoft word, google docs etc. it can also be handwritten)
•
Four sides of A4 for you reference list of secondary sources (There is no requirement for Harvard referencing in your sources, you can just list different links)
•
Ethics
•
Bias
•
Pilot study
•
Secondary Sources
•
Secondary research
•
Qualitative Research
•
Quantitative Research
•
Limitations
•
Validity
•
Reliability
•
Surveys (Quantitative)
•
Interviews (Qualitative)
•
Focus Groups (Qualitative)
•
Experiments (Quantitative)
•
Mixed Methods (Qualitative and Quantitative)
•
Questionnaire (Quantitative)
•
Secondary Data Analysis (Both)
•
Case Study (Both)
•
Observations (Participant and non-participant)
•
Longitudinal Studies (Both)
•
Primary Data (Both)
•
Activity 1 = 15 Marks
•
Activity 2 = 15 Marks
•
Activity 3 = 20 Marks
•
Activity 4 = 15 Marks
•
Saying whether the main article is reliable
•
Who was the authors? Do they have an history of education around this specific field
•
The year that it was made, whether of not their data is true
•
Is it valid
•
Should they use a different research method
•
Justifying why you think that way i.e. they should have used in the main article questionnaires instead of interviews BECAUSE it’s less time consuming and you get more samples), see how I added because? This is called justifying
•
But
•
However
•
Moreover
•
On the other hand
•
Also
•
This (Article here) supports (secondary source here) as they both.....
•
This (Article here) disagrees with (secondary sources here) as they....
•
This data in the (article here) is back up by (enter secondary source(s) here) as....
•
Similar to...
•
Likewise
•
An article about current health issue (i.e. coronavirus, SARS, Ebola, heart disease, lung cancer, and chronic lower respiratory diseases etc.)
•
An article about current social care issue (aging population, debates about vaccinations, growing population, wating times in the NHS, UK government spending on the NHS, lack of staff in the healthcare sector, many people leaving the healthcare sector, funding towards NHS staff etc.)
•
Facts, figures and data relating to secondary sources covering the article’s area of research
•
The research methods used in the learner’s own secondary research
•
Choose one of the two articles that your tutors will provide you with, either an article about a current health issue or an article about a current social care issue
•
After choosing one article make sure you understand it by reading it through again and again, to highlighting it
•
Once you understood the article find other sources relating to the article which are current within the last 5 years (this is called secondary sources)
•
These secondary sources are used for comparing and contrasting the main article with secondary sources (or even comparing two secondary sources
•
There’s no limit to how many secondary sources you can used however, when you make your own references it needs to be within four sides of A4
•
You don’t need to print your main article as it will be there in Part B
•
You can’t print your secondary sources and bring it with you to your supervised assessment
•
Four sides of A4 four your notes (size 12 point on Microsoft word, google docs etc. it can also be handwritten)
•
Four sides of A4 for you reference list of secondary sources (There is no requirement for Harvard referencing in your sources, you can just list different links)
•
Ethics
•
Bias
•
Pilot study
•
Secondary Sources
•
Secondary research
•
Qualitative Research
•
Quantitative Research
•
Limitations
•
Validity
•
Reliability
•
Surveys (Quantitative)
•
Interviews (Qualitative)
•
Focus Groups (Qualitative)
•
Experiments (Quantitative)
•
Mixed Methods (Qualitative and Quantitative)
•
Questionnaire (Quantitative)
•
Secondary Data Analysis (Both)
•
Case Study (Both)
•
Observations (Participant and non-participant)
•
Longitudinal Studies (Both)
•
Primary Data (Both)
•
Activity 1 = 15 Marks
•
Activity 2 = 15 Marks
•
Activity 3 = 20 Marks
•
Activity 4 = 15 Marks
•
Saying whether the main article is reliable
•
Who was the authors? Do they have an history of education around this specific field
•
The year that it was made, whether of not their data is true
•
Is it valid
•
Should they use a different research method
•
Justifying why you think that way i.e. they should have used in the main article questionnaires instead of interviews BECAUSE it’s less time consuming and you get more samples), see how I added because? This is called justifying
•
But
•
However
•
Moreover
•
On the other hand
•
Also
•
This (Article here) supports (secondary source here) as they both.....
•
This (Article here) disagrees with (secondary sources here) as they....
•
This data in the (article here) is back up by (enter secondary source(s) here) as....
•
Similar to...
•
Likewise
Last reply 6 days ago
Unit 6 btec business 2025 january pre release release case study.Last reply 6 days ago
Would I still get a pass If I manage to get a merit or distinction on some of my unitLast reply 1 week ago
Contemporary issues in science unit 7 BTEC Applied ScienceLast reply 4 weeks ago
Health and social care unit 4 activity 2Last reply 1 month ago
Btec business unit 6 principles of managementLast reply 1 month ago
Unit 11 Cyber Security Incident Management and Unit 14 IT Service Delivery BTECLast reply 1 month ago
Health and social care, level 3, BTECLast reply 1 month ago
BTEC IT Level 3 unit 1 exam 17th May 2024Last reply 6 months ago
Btec level 3 extended business dimplomaLast reply 8 months ago
For BTEC IT Level 3 unit 1 exam 12 Jan 2024Last reply 8 months ago
BTEC Business Unit 2 Marketing Campaign Exam May 2024Last reply 8 months ago
BTEC Level 3 IT Unit 2 Exam May 2024Last reply 8 months ago
BTEC Business Unit 2 May 2024 - Funky Flasks