Scroll to see replies
Reply 20
•
An article about current health issue (i.e. coronavirus, SARS, Ebola, heart disease, lung cancer, and chronic lower respiratory diseases etc.)
•
An article about current social care issue (aging population, debates about vaccinations, growing population, wating times in the NHS, UK government spending on the NHS, lack of staff in the healthcare sector, many people leaving the healthcare sector, funding towards NHS staff etc.)
•
Facts, figures and data relating to secondary sources covering the article’s area of research
•
The research methods used in the learner’s own secondary research
•
Choose one of the two articles that your tutors will provide you with, either an article about a current health issue or an article about a current social care issue
•
After choosing one article make sure you understand it by reading it through again and again, to highlighting it
•
Once you understood the article find other sources relating to the article which are current within the last 5 years (this is called secondary sources)
•
These secondary sources are used for comparing and contrasting the main article with secondary sources (or even comparing two secondary sources
•
There’s no limit to how many secondary sources you can used however, when you make your own references it needs to be within four sides of A4
•
You don’t need to print your main article as it will be there in Part B
•
You can’t print your secondary sources and bring it with you to your supervised assessment
•
Four sides of A4 four your notes (size 12 point on Microsoft word, google docs etc. it can also be handwritten)
•
Four sides of A4 for you reference list of secondary sources (There is no requirement for Harvard referencing in your sources, you can just list different links)
•
Ethics
•
Bias
•
Pilot study
•
Secondary Sources
•
Secondary research
•
Qualitative Research
•
Quantitative Research
•
Limitations
•
Validity
•
Reliability
•
Surveys (Quantitative)
•
Interviews (Qualitative)
•
Focus Groups (Qualitative)
•
Experiments (Quantitative)
•
Mixed Methods (Qualitative and Quantitative)
•
Questionnaire (Quantitative)
•
Secondary Data Analysis (Both)
•
Case Study (Both)
•
Observations (Participant and non-participant)
•
Longitudinal Studies (Both)
•
Primary Data (Both)
•
Activity 1 = 15 Marks
•
Activity 2 = 15 Marks
•
Activity 3 = 20 Marks
•
Activity 4 = 15 Marks
•
Saying whether the main article is reliable
•
Who was the authors? Do they have an history of education around this specific field
•
The year that it was made, whether of not their data is true
•
Is it valid
•
Should they use a different research method
•
Justifying why you think that way i.e. they should have used in the main article questionnaires instead of interviews BECAUSE it’s less time consuming and you get more samples), see how I added because? This is called justifying
•
But
•
However
•
Moreover
•
On the other hand
•
Also
•
This (Article here) supports (secondary source here) as they both.....
•
This (Article here) disagrees with (secondary sources here) as they....
•
This data in the (article here) is back up by (enter secondary source(s) here) as....
•
Similar to...
•
Likewise

Reply 21

Reply 22
•
The different research methods referred to in the article
•
The potential sources of bias in the data collected
•
Research methods referred to in the article are explained, demonstrating a thorough understanding of data usage and response includes fully supported evaluative judgements on suitability
•
Conclusions on suitability of research methods are offered and fully supported, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the concept in the context of the methods used
•
The author, who was the one who conducted the research and what was their educational background? (i.e. having a phD or an expert in that field)
•
Their sample sizes how many people were involved in this research?
•
Was their research method sutable for their topic? What research method should they use instead?
•
Compare the article to your secondary sources, is your article more reliable or less reliable? Or more valid or less valid
•
What were the pros and cons or each research method that the article used?
•
What did your secondary sources do that the article did not? (i.e. did they explain what location they were focusing on, was they ssample size more diverse)
•
Did your article explain their limiations or ethics?
•
Did your article take consideration into the participants age, gender, race, ethnicity, social class to make it more generalisable?
•
In what way could the article be bais? Is your article more or less bias than your secondary sources
•
Explain the definitions of the different research method
•
The pros and cons of each research method
•
Compare the articles research methods to your secondary sources, did your secondary souces get a more accurate result than you article or vice versa
•
Provide improvments and recommendations on what research methods the article should use instead (or was the research method reliable and valid)
•
Was the research article written in an understandable way for the general public? Compare it to your secondary sources
•
Look at the year this research was conducted, is it relatable today? Compare it to your secondary sources
•
Have the article explained why they conducting those research methods? Compare to you secondary sources
•
Which organisations were involved with the research? Do those organisations make the research more/less valid or more/less reliable? Compare to your secondary sources
Reply 23
•
Analyses the issue (which is the importance of supporting disabled people to find paid employment), leading to conclusions about the issue’s importance. Provides relevant examples (in your secondary sources and articles) of how the issue affects individuals and/or professionals and/or the wider society, which are fully supported by research findings
•
Secondary research findings and their relationship to the issue in the article are explained; demonstrates a thorough understanding of the relationship between the two
Reply 24
•
Implications of the research for provision/practice in the sector are analysed and explained systematically
•
Implications referred to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the issue and its context in the article and wider research; likely to include recommendations for change which are justified
•
Rationale for implications always offered and fully supported
Reply 25
•
The ethical issues to be considered
•
The research methods to be used and the objectives of the research
•
Provides rationalised consideration of suggested research methods and improvements/changes that could be made, demonstrating a thorough understanding of method effectiveness/suitability
•
Response demonstrates thorough analytical approach. Coverage of planning considerations, ethical issues and necessary research skills required to explore the issue demonstrates a thorough understanding of practical problems of conducting research in the context, addressed in a logical sustained systematic way
•
Judgements on importance of considerations are fully supported
Reply 26
Reply 27
Reply 28
Reply 29
Reply 30
Reply 31

Reply 32

I'm glad this work can help peopleReply 33
I'm glad this work can help people
Reply 34
•
How quantitative research methods have been used to improve reliability
•
You explained the research methods they used in the article, demonstrating a thorough understanding of data usage; response includes fully supported evaluative judgements on suitability
•
Your conclusions on suitability of research methods are offered and fully supported, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the concept in the context of the methods used
•
Explain what quantitative research is
•
Explain what research method they used in the article (was it an interview?, survey?, questionnaire?) then compare it to your secondary research (What reesarch methods have they used? and was it quantitative to qualitative?) and explain the definition of the research method
•
Talk about how they extracted data compared to your secondary scources (i.e. In the article they used 181 people however they didn't say how many men and women were there, their age. location etc)
•
Define reliability
•
Is quantitative research reliable or not and explain the pros and cons of it? (can it be repeated? is it accurate?)
•
Did this quantitative reserch method in the article improved their reliability compared to other secondary sources? (clue: consider looking at the date, who the author was, the sample size, did they use graphs?)
•
Define sutability
•
You analysed (meaning explaining and critiquing) the issue, leading to conclusions about the issue’s importance
•
You provided relevant examples of how the issue affects individuals and/or professionals and/or the wider society, which are fully supported by your secondary research findings
•
Your secondary research findings and their relationship to the issue (which is the diagnosis for individuals with arthritis) in the article are explained and you demonstrated a thorough understanding of the relationship between the two
•
Explain whether the aricle is reliable or not or are there some parts that are reliable and some parts are not? and why (for example in the article they didn't explain individuals levels of different proteins in their blood by using graphs making it unreliable as it will be diffcult to compare this data with other data on similar things)
•
Provide 3 to 4 examples from you secondary sources to show evidence on why that research is more/less reliable compared to your article (What research method did they use to make it more/less reliable than the article)
•
Provide current (Past 5 years) examples from your secondary sources to show how the issue (arthritis) can affect individuials (remember PIES), professionals and society (i.e. arthritis can affect the individual as they are restricted in their movements, arthritis can affect society because it can affect social relationships also pain and loss of independence can make people feel frustrated, angry, and depressed, which can in turn affect other members of the family and friends)
•
If the article is unreliable and gives false information how can it affect the individual, society and professionals?
•
Compare your seconday sources to the article about arthritis (Do they come to the same conclusion, what method is the most reliable method from your secondary sources)
•
What reliable method should the article use instead? and why are these methods reliable?
•
If the article and your secondary scources are reliable and provides accurate information how can it affect individuals, society and professionals?
•
You conclusion should explain why it's important to develop reliable methods on diagnosis for individuals with arthritis by summarising your points it should start with: In conlusion, the reason why it's important to develop reliable methods on the diagnosis for individuals with arthritis is because....
Reply 35
Reply 36
•
How quantitative research methods have been used to improve reliability
•
You explained the research methods they used in the article, demonstrating a thorough understanding of data usage; response includes fully supported evaluative judgements on suitability
•
Your conclusions on suitability of research methods are offered and fully supported, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the concept in the context of the methods used
•
Explain what quantitative research is
•
Explain what research method they used in the article (was it an interview?, survey?, questionnaire?) then compare it to your secondary research (What reesarch methods have they used? and was it quantitative to qualitative?) and explain the definition of the research method
•
Talk about how they extracted data compared to your secondary scources (i.e. In the article they used 181 people however they didn't say how many men and women were there, their age. location etc)
•
Define reliability
•
Is quantitative research reliable or not and explain the pros and cons of it? (can it be repeated? is it accurate?)
•
Did this quantitative reserch method in the article improved their reliability compared to other secondary sources? (clue: consider looking at the date, who the author was, the sample size, did they use graphs?)
•
Define sutability
Reply 37
Reply 38
if possibleReply 39
if possibleLast reply 9 months ago
Applied science btec - what do i need?Last reply 9 months ago
If i quit my WJEC applied diploma in criminology now will i still get the certificateLast reply 9 months ago
Uniformed and public servicesLast reply 9 months ago
Health and social care Btec gradingLast reply 9 months ago
predicted grades - btec applied scienceLast reply 9 months ago
Level 2 adult numeracy and literacy still accepted?Last reply 9 months ago
Btec health and social care unit 6Last reply 10 months ago
NCFE CACHE L3 Certificate Health and Social Care resultsPosted 10 months ago
BTEC Business grade (First Year)Last reply 10 months ago
Health and Social Care Level 3Last reply 10 months ago
Btec level 3 Applied science extended diploma gradeLast reply 11 months ago
Can I get into uni with 2 btecs?To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.