# maths vectors

Watch
Announcements
#1
the vectors 2a + kb and 5a + 3b are parallel. find the value of k.
0
1 week ago
#2
(Original post by alinazubairx)
the vectors 2a + kb and 5a + 3b are parallel. find the value of k.
What must you multiply 5 by to get 2?

So multiply 3 by the same thing to get k.

All this is coming from simply comparing the coefficients of vectors a and b.
0
#3
(Original post by RDKGames)
What must you multiply 5 by to get 2?

So multiply 3 by the same thing to get k.

All this is coming from simply comparing the coefficients of vectors a and b.
so u just multiply 5a + 3b by 2/5?
could you explain it to me pls?
0
1 week ago
#4
(Original post by alinazubairx)
so u just multiply 5a + 3b by 2/5?
could you explain it to me pls?
If the vector is parallel to , then this second vector is a scalar multiple of the first one.

So, we have that where is the scalar.

We can rearrange this into , and because the two vectors are not scalar multiples of another, we must have that the coefficients of these vectors are zero in order to have the zero vector on the RHS.

This implies that and from the first equation we find that this scalar multiple is precisely which we can substitute into the second equation and that that .

That's the expalanation, and the quick way is to find the scalar by simply observing what you need to multiple the coefficient of by in the second vector in order to get the coefficient of in the first vector. Then use it on the vectors.
0
#5
(Original post by RDKGames)
If the vector is parallel to , then this second vector is a scalar multiple of the first one.

So, we have that where is the scalar.

We can rearrange this into , and because the two vectors are not scalar multiples of another, we must have that the coefficients of these vectors are zero in order to have the zero vector on the RHS.

This implies that and from the first equation we find that this scalar multiple is precisely which we can substitute into the second equation and that that .

That's the expalanation, and the quick way is to find the scalar by simply observing what you need to multiple the coefficient of by in the second vector in order to get the coefficient of in the first vector. Then use it on the vectors.
oh i see. thank you very much!
0
X

new posts Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### With no certainty that exams next year will take place, how does this make you feel?

More motivated (65)
27.78%
Less motivated (169)
72.22%