Girls, I'm not going to complain about you wanting a guy taller than you, but...
Watch
Announcements
Report
#81
(Original post by ANM775)
I think it's accurate for the vast majority of women, as lets face it, very very few women build significant amounts of muscle.
can be less accurate for men though due to the fact some are lifters..
I think it's accurate for the vast majority of women, as lets face it, very very few women build significant amounts of muscle.
can be less accurate for men though due to the fact some are lifters..
0
reply
Report
#82
(Original post by ANM775)
I think it's accurate for the vast majority of women, as lets face it, very very few women build significant amounts of muscle.
can be less accurate for men though due to the fact some are lifters..
I think it's accurate for the vast majority of women, as lets face it, very very few women build significant amounts of muscle.
can be less accurate for men though due to the fact some are lifters..
0
reply
Report
#83
(Original post by Anonymous)
Lol what?
Lol what?
0
reply
Report
#84
(Original post by blackugo)
Well, they said fat people aren't always "unhealthy". Where is the exact point you place an "overweight person" being as being unhealthy? Obviously there is a point where you can clearly tell someone is unhealthy. Peoples ideas of healthy tend to vary as well.
Well, they said fat people aren't always "unhealthy". Where is the exact point you place an "overweight person" being as being unhealthy? Obviously there is a point where you can clearly tell someone is unhealthy. Peoples ideas of healthy tend to vary as well.
0
reply
Report
#86
(Original post by Chopinnocturne31)
Not true at all. Just because women don’t usually build as much muscle as men so it’s not usually as visible, it does not mean that it wouldn’t warp the results. It definitely would. And even if it didn’t, it doesn’t take into account any other factors such as bone mass and it also doesn’t have any differentiation for men and women
Not true at all. Just because women don’t usually build as much muscle as men so it’s not usually as visible, it does not mean that it wouldn’t warp the results. It definitely would. And even if it didn’t, it doesn’t take into account any other factors such as bone mass and it also doesn’t have any differentiation for men and women
you're very unlikely to see a BMI 27 woman who isn't fat .... whereas for a guy you see that basically each time you enter the gym
0
reply
(Original post by blackugo)
Well, they said fat people aren't always "unhealthy". Where is the exact point you place an "overweight person" being as being unhealthy? Obviously there is a point where you can clearly tell someone is unhealthy. Peoples ideas of healthy tend to vary as well.
Well, they said fat people aren't always "unhealthy". Where is the exact point you place an "overweight person" being as being unhealthy? Obviously there is a point where you can clearly tell someone is unhealthy. Peoples ideas of healthy tend to vary as well.
0
reply
Report
#89
(Original post by ANM775)
I thought americans use lbs?
I thought americans use lbs?
0
reply
Report
#90
(Original post by Vanessa Chuah)
yeah we do lol. i just converted it for everyone since majority of the people are in the uk lol.
yeah we do lol. i just converted it for everyone since majority of the people are in the uk lol.
I don't know what is wrong with all these UK people using kgs ... j/k
0
reply
Report
#91
(Original post by Chopinnocturne31)
I never said specifically overweight. A lot of people are considered fat before they reach the title of overweight and overweight is pretty much always unhealthy. Some people are naturally just bigger without being overweight, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they are unhealthy
I never said specifically overweight. A lot of people are considered fat before they reach the title of overweight and overweight is pretty much always unhealthy. Some people are naturally just bigger without being overweight, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they are unhealthy
Googles definition of healthy is: 'in a good physical or mental condition; in good health.'
That sounds pretty arbitrary to me. One person may believe they are in good physical or mental condition and another might not. Some people are not "healthy" despite their BMI being a "healthy weight". Good is a subjective term.
0
reply
Report
#92
(Original post by ANM775)
mainly only fat girls are going to feel uncomfortable with that question
mainly only fat girls are going to feel uncomfortable with that question
0
reply
Report
#93
(Original post by blackugo)
Yeah, but there is no specific point where you can determine someone is unhealthy based on their weight alone is the point I am making.
Googles definition of healthy is: 'in a good physical or mental condition; in good health.'
That sounds pretty arbitrary to me. One person may believe they are in good physical or mental condition and another might not. Some people are not "healthy" despite their BMI being a "healthy weight". Good is a subjective term.
Yeah, but there is no specific point where you can determine someone is unhealthy based on their weight alone is the point I am making.
Googles definition of healthy is: 'in a good physical or mental condition; in good health.'
That sounds pretty arbitrary to me. One person may believe they are in good physical or mental condition and another might not. Some people are not "healthy" despite their BMI being a "healthy weight". Good is a subjective term.

0
reply
Report
#94
(Original post by Anonymous)
If you're overweight, you're unhealthy. It's as simple as that. If you're muscly and your BMI is over 25, then exercise is obviously taken into account, but if there's no exercise and you're overweight... i.e fat... you're unhealthy.
If you're overweight, you're unhealthy. It's as simple as that. If you're muscly and your BMI is over 25, then exercise is obviously taken into account, but if there's no exercise and you're overweight... i.e fat... you're unhealthy.
0
reply
Report
#95
(Original post by ANM775)
you should have converted it to stones
I don't know what is wrong with all these UK people using kgs ... j/k
you should have converted it to stones
I don't know what is wrong with all these UK people using kgs ... j/k

Last edited by Chopinnocturne31; 3 months ago
0
reply
Report
#96
I find myself keep having to convert weights from kgs or lbs to stones when people post them online

0
reply
Report
#97
(Original post by ANM775)
I've always found it very simple.
I find myself keep having to convert weights from kgs or lbs to stones when people post them online
I've always found it very simple.
I find myself keep having to convert weights from kgs or lbs to stones when people post them online

0
reply
Report
#98
(Original post by ANM775)
and why is everyone stating their weight in kilograms?
whatever happened to stones?
did i miss a memo or something?
and why is everyone stating their weight in kilograms?

whatever happened to stones?
did i miss a memo or something?
3
reply
Report
#99
(Original post by ANM775)
I've always found it very simple.
I find myself keep having to convert weights from kgs or lbs to stones when people post them online
I've always found it very simple.
I find myself keep having to convert weights from kgs or lbs to stones when people post them online

0
reply
Report
#100
(Original post by blackugo)
Just switch to kg. For science.
Just switch to kg. For science.
londonmyst I don't think is switching either.
Stones 4 lyfe

0
reply
X
Quick Reply
Back
to top
to top