Mad Man
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 8 months ago
#1
A stone is fired vertically upwards from a catapult and lands 5.0s later. What was the initial velocity of the stone? For how long was the stone at a height of 20m or more?

My answer: 25m/s for part a
but the second answer is 3s and I don't know how. Is this a misprint?
0
reply
Muttley79
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#2
Report 8 months ago
#2
(Original post by Mad Man)
A stone is fired vertically upwards from a catapult and lands 5.0s later. What was the initial velocity of the stone? For how long was the stone at a height of 20m or more?

My answer: 25m/s for part a
but the second answer is 3s and I don't know how. Is this a misprint?
Post your working please
0
reply
Mad Man
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 8 months ago
#3
s=0
u=?
v=v
a=-10m/s
t=5.0

use s=ut+1/2 at^2 then u =25m/s

hiwo do i do the second bit?

I did
s>20
u=25
a=-10

then formed a quadratic to solve t and got t=4 t=1
0
reply
Muttley79
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#4
Report 8 months ago
#4
(Original post by Mad Man)
s=0
u=?
v=v
a=-10m/s
t=5.0

use s=ut+1/2 at^2 then u =25m/s

hiwo do i do the second bit?

I did
s>20
u=25
a=-10

then formed a quadratic to solve t and got t=4 t=1
Yes so at t= 1 it reaches 20 m and carries on upwards then stops and comes down reaching 20m after 4 seconds - so it is above 20 m for 4 - 1 = 3 seconds
0
reply
Mad Man
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#5
Report Thread starter 8 months ago
#5
please help
0
reply
Mad Man
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#6
Report Thread starter 8 months ago
#6
(Original post by Muttley79)
Yes so at t= 1 it reaches 20 m and carries on upwards then stops and comes down reaching 20m after 4 seconds - so it is above 20 m for 4 - 1 = 3 seconds
Oh thanks. I've never seen a question like this before. How would I know that? These suvat questions keep catching me out , I'm getting stressed.
0
reply
Muttley79
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#7
Report 8 months ago
#7
(Original post by Mad Man)
Oh thanks. I've never seen a question like this before. How would I know that? These suvat questions keep catching me out , I'm getting stressed.
Look back at the question and think about the stone going up and down - you solved the quadratic and got two values. These are the times when the stone is exactly 20 m above the ground ... we want the time the stone is above 20 metres.

You need to 'see' scenarios in your head if you can
0
reply
Mad Man
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#8
Report Thread starter 8 months ago
#8
(Original post by Muttley79)
Look back at the question and think about the stone going up and down - you solved the quadratic and got two values. These are the times when the stone is exactly 20 m above the ground ... we want the time the stone is above 20 metres.

You need to 'see' scenarios in your head if you can
Note taken.
0
reply
Mad Man
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#9
Report Thread starter 8 months ago
#9
(Original post by Muttley79)
Look back at the question and think about the stone going up and down - you solved the quadratic and got two values. These are the times when the stone is exactly 20 m above the ground ... we want the time the stone is above 20 metres.

You need to 'see' scenarios in your head if you can
Can you explain this algebraically?
0
reply
RogerOxon
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#10
Report 8 months ago
#10
(Original post by Mad Man)
Can you explain this algebraically?
Draw a graph of height verses time. Mark the times that it above 20m. Does that make it clearer?
0
reply
Muttley79
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#11
Report 8 months ago
#11
(Original post by Mad Man)
Can you explain this algebraically?
s=20
u=25
a=-10

Using s = ut + 0.5 t^2

20 = 25 t - 5t^2

5^2 - 25 t + 20 = 0
t^2 - 5t + 4 = 0

then (t - 4)(t - 1) = 0 so t = 1 or 4

we need the time period in between when 25 t - 5t^2 >20
0
reply
Mad Man
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#12
Report Thread starter 8 months ago
#12
(Original post by RogerOxon)
Draw a graph of height verses time. Mark the times that it above 20m. Does that make it clearer?
Yes it makes sense now. I guess I didn't read the question carefully.
Attached files
0
reply
Kubsyy
Badges: 17
Rep:
?
#13
Report 8 months ago
#13
I’m not a physics expert but couldn’t you just use a = v-u / t and rearrange to t?

(My physics teacher says that if ut in s = ut + 1/2at^2 does not cancel then you should immediately stop as it leads to quadratic and choose another formula)
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Should the school day be extended to help students catch up?

Yes (20)
31.75%
No (43)
68.25%

Watched Threads

View All