I couldn't really care to be honest.
What will him being gone accomplish? Another tory who likely has no clue about education comes into the role.. wants to make their mark and stamp their name all over it, brings in a load of new changes, ****s up in the same ways as the last few have..
Lets have a look at the last few..
Gavin - Career politician, straight track from the student politics to MP, no history in education
Damian - 18 years in pubs/hotels...
Justine - Accountant/finance manager
Nicky - Solicitor
Michael - Journalist
Ed - experience teaching in higher education
Alan - union work
Ruth - experience teaching in higher education
Charles - unions
Estelle - teacher
Blunkett - lecturer
So going back to Blairs landslide in 1997, we have a pretty one sided story.
Labour had 6 people in the role, 4 of which had direct work or experience in the education sector.
The conservatives have appointed 5 people, 0 of which had any connection to education except being a student themselves.
I'm not saying that you must have been a teacher or a lecturer to be a good education secretary, but it shows how the role is viewed. In the tory party its just another promotional tool. its given to whoever needs a new role for what ever political purpose they can serve to the guys in charge. At least with Labour it meant a little bit more, and there was a bit more of a strain of actual educational experience coming from the top.
So what then, if you sack Gavin? Boris puts in another person who has equally little clue, and wants to use it as a career footstall.. Great.
So no..if you want to fix education, don't sack Gavin - instead we need to change whole way education is managed, and probably sack the tory party in the process.