ENGAA Paper 2019

Watch
#1
can someone give me hand with question 19 on the 2019 ENGAA paper for Section 1? completely baffled as to how the answer is 8 for the height.
0
4 weeks ago
#2
(Original post by VendibleWolf)
can someone give me hand with question 19 on the 2019 ENGAA paper for Section 1? completely baffled as to how the answer is 8 for the height.
Can you post the question?
0
#3
(Original post by RogerOxon)
Can you post the question?
the question is on that link. i have no clue how to put it on here otherwise
0
4 weeks ago
#4
(Original post by VendibleWolf)
the question is on that link. i have no clue how to put it on here otherwise

What expression did you get for the area of each triangular side?
0
4 weeks ago
#5
(Original post by RogerOxon)
What expression did you get for the area of each triangular side?
I'd start with the perpendicular distance from the midpoint of an edge of the base to the apex. Draw a triangle with vertices at the midpoint of the base, the midpoint of one of its edges, and the apex.
0
#6
(Original post by RogerOxon)
I'd start with the perpendicular distance from the midpoint of an edge of the base to the apex. Draw a triangle with vertices at the midpoint of the base, the midpoint of one of its edges, and the apex.
for the area of each triangle, i got 0.5xsquare root(h^2+36)x 12 using Pythagoras theorem to find the height of each triangle and then using 0.5xBxH
Last edited by VendibleWolf; 4 weeks ago
0
#7
(Original post by VendibleWolf)
for the area of each triangle, i got 0.5xsquare root(h^2x36)x 12 using Pythagoras theorem to find the height of each triangle and then using 0.5xBxH
The timesed it by 4 and then add 144 (area of the base) and then equate it to 48h which I believe is the volume of the pyramid. for some reason, i am only able to get 2root(6) as an answer which is apparently wrong as it's not even an option. am i being special?
0
4 weeks ago
#8
(Original post by VendibleWolf)
The timesed it by 4 and then add 144 (area of the base) and then equate it to 48h which I believe is the volume of the pyramid. for some reason, i am only able to get 2root(6) as an answer which is apparently wrong as it's not even an option. am i being special?
Agreed, the volume of the pyramid is 48h.

0
4 weeks ago
#9
Let the perpendicular face height be x:

This simplifies to give two solutions.
0
#10
(Original post by RogerOxon)
Agreed, the volume of the pyramid is 48h.

excuse the awful handwriting. IDK why its sideways.
0
4 weeks ago
#11
(Original post by VendibleWolf)
excuse the awful handwriting. IDK why its sideways.
You went from:

to

to get rid of the square root. You can't.

See my post above for a simpler approach. Using x to denote the perpendicular height of the triangular faces reduces the amount of writing. You've got to keep these things as simple as possible for as long as possible.
Last edited by RogerOxon; 4 weeks ago
0
#12
(Original post by RogerOxon)
You went from:

to

to get rid of the square root. You can't.

See my post above for a simpler approach. Using x to denote the perpendicular height of the triangular faces reduces the amount of writing. You've got to keep these things as simple as possible for as long as possible.
I don't understand why I can't write the perpendicular height as the square root of h^2 plus 6^2. I understand what you have done but I don't see the correlation between what you have said I can't do and what I have done. if that makes sense...
0
4 weeks ago
#13
(Original post by VendibleWolf)
I don't understand why I can't write the perpendicular height as the square root of h^2 plus 6^2. I understand what you have done but I don't see the correlation between what you have said I can't do and what I have done. if that makes sense...
You went from:

To:

0
#14
(Original post by RogerOxon)
You went from:

To:

why cant I do that?
0
4 weeks ago
#15
(Original post by VendibleWolf)
why cant I do that?
Because it would be:

Try it with h=8, and see what you get before and after.
0
#16
(Original post by VendibleWolf)
why cant I do that?
would I have to do (6+Squareroot(h^2+36))^2 in order to do it correctly?
0
#17
(Original post by RogerOxon)
Because it would be:

Try it with h=8, and see what you get before and after.
Ok yeah, I'm with you. thanks for the help. Not sure how I forgot how that's how it works. much appreciated
0
4 weeks ago
#18
(Original post by VendibleWolf)
Ok yeah, I'm with you. thanks for the help. Not sure how I forgot how that's how it works. much appreciated
No problem. We all get brain failure from time to time.
1
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Poll

Join the discussion

Should there be a new university admissions system that ditches predicted grades?

No, I think predicted grades should still be used to make offers (707)
33.91%
Yes, I like the idea of applying to uni after I received my grades (PQA) (891)
42.73%
Yes, I like the idea of receiving offers only after I receive my grades (PQO) (394)
18.9%
I think there is a better option than the ones suggested (let us know in the thread!) (93)
4.46%

View All
Latest
My Feed

Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.