Your words, not mine. If you don't get how referencing works though..
There is indeed, given that in no way does your hemp based 'diet' come out trumps yet, the status quo stands
. It's a fairly standard principle of scientific rigour that your point of view needs to be
proved not merely conjectured to be considered as proof.
Never mind it is a matter of extremely base biology that the nutrients available in a balanced diet is preferable to, well, nibbling on a parsnip.
Then again, given your starting position claimed that your argument was "flawless" (
) and then proceeded to go off on a, err.. 'unique' example about alien restaurants. Well...